View Single Post
Old 21-01-2010, 11:41 PM   #60
I6DOHC
Regular Member
 
I6DOHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPFS1
Their throw away line is accurate enough, but the reasons are not as sinister as it seems.

Engineering is extremely cyclical.
Fair enough. There seems to have been a lot of mis-representation & contradiction in the media lately (about ford & the falcon) so I guess it's not overly surprising. It almost seems like the Journalist in question is determined to try and justify the original story he published a week or so ago & is throwing anything he dig up as 'evidence'.

As far as I'm concerned, if Ford (globally) decide to bin the RWD architecture of the Aussie falcon, then they are potentially losing an opportunity to enhance the reputation they are building in regards to driving dynamics. It would be a great day to see a Mustang sitting on top of the falcon underpinnings...would make it a true all-round performance sedan (and would make this aussie, and I dare say many others, proud). Here's hoping anyway.
I6DOHC is offline   Reply With Quote