Quote:
Originally Posted by arm79
Sweet Jebus...
I'm assuming your objecting to my comments regarding dates.
Well... You'd be wrong about the sources, because all of the come from places other than your beloved Fox news. The date of his previous covid infection is listed as a day or 2 prior to the 23/6 where it was reported by The Guardian.
The final date to request a medical exemption comes from the AO information sheet.
image
See the last paragraph.
I'm not doubting the dates put forth by his lawyer. All I'm saying is they fall outside final dates for exemption set forth by AO and that AO must have jumped through hoops to organise this exemption given it could only have been applied for at least a week after the final date.
He couldn't have submitted one earlier because he was outside of the 6 month window. |
nope want objecting to anything
was agreeing with the highlighted part where you say , hence why i highlighted it , next time ill cut the post down to what im agreeing with in the return comment "yep" oh and fox isnt some where id usually go so not my
beloved
Quote:
|
That is scary in itself. If he was definitely infected and knew it it shows his attitude toward covid and his little care for other people.
|
esp if it seems now that he has contracted it/recontacted it /or supposedly contracted it on the 16th dec , which i had just heard on a news brief so googled it and came up with that link
which gives me 2 questions
if these letters prier to the 16th dec , form hunt or atagi or whom ever stating prier covid pos wasnt going to be acceptable why did ao still give on untill it was sorted
and if he did supposedly have a pos reading on the 16th dec why would he think its still ok to travel anywhere in the world so soon or why did the medical officer of tennis aust think he would be allowed to travel