|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
View Poll Results: What is the better option? | |||
2.0 4 cyl with turbo and direct-injection on PULP | 106 | 30.55% | |
4.0 6 cyl with liquid injection LPG | 241 | 69.45% | |
Voters: 347. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
05-03-2011, 09:23 PM | #1 | ||
I was correct - AGAIN
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 1,801
|
Lots of money is being spent to offer new engine variants which will be cheaper to run. Which one will be successul?
|
||
05-03-2011, 09:27 PM | #2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: perth
Posts: 4,355
|
wheres the v8 option ?
__________________
yes still (as money n time permit) doing the rebuilding the zh fairlane with a clevo 400m 4v heads injected whipple blown with aode 4 speed trans to a 9" ....... we'll get there eventually just remember don't be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark...Professionals built the Titanic! I have taken up meditation... at least it's better than sitting around doing nothing !! |
||
05-03-2011, 09:37 PM | #3 | |||
I was correct - AGAIN
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 1,801
|
Quote:
|
|||
05-03-2011, 09:48 PM | #4 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,412
|
Ecoboost doesn't need PULP, it's designed to operate on 91 RON petrol.
|
||
05-03-2011, 09:54 PM | #5 | |||
No longer a Uni student..
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
|
Quote:
|
|||
05-03-2011, 09:56 PM | #6 | |||
I was correct - AGAIN
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 1,801
|
Quote:
|
|||
This user likes this post: |
05-03-2011, 11:55 PM | #7 | ||
LIKE A BOSS 351
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 2,779
|
I'd go the diesel....hrmm, no diesel option?
|
||
19-11-2012, 11:29 AM | #8 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 770
|
|
||
05-03-2011, 09:29 PM | #9 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,344
|
I'd say V8 too.
But Out of the above 2... The 4.0L I6 |
||
05-03-2011, 10:12 PM | #11 | |||
I was correct - AGAIN
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 1,801
|
Quote:
2. It is not an engine devised specifically for reduced running costs 3. Name one Falcon model which is fitted with a Miami engine. |
|||
26-06-2011, 08:45 PM | #13 | |||
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Gormandale, VIC
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
__________________
1996 EF XR8 1978 XC Coupe 1970 XY Fairmont (My project) 1974 XB Fairmont |
|||
05-03-2011, 10:20 PM | #14 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: perth
Posts: 4,355
|
recon if they get the chance we will loose the 8 completely and the turbo wouldnt be far behind
__________________
yes still (as money n time permit) doing the rebuilding the zh fairlane with a clevo 400m 4v heads injected whipple blown with aode 4 speed trans to a 9" ....... we'll get there eventually just remember don't be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark...Professionals built the Titanic! I have taken up meditation... at least it's better than sitting around doing nothing !! |
||
05-03-2011, 11:48 PM | #15 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
|
Quote:
|
|||
06-03-2011, 12:13 AM | #16 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 290
|
I6 with liquid injection fully integrated with the rest of the car, with no compromise, is almost something to die for... I run Orbital liquid dual fuel system on my BF, and it is flawless. It has also improved the performance (acceleration, response) of the engine. Very happy with this trouble-free system.
|
||
06-03-2011, 12:15 AM | #17 | ||
meh.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Was Central Coast, Now Sydney NSW
Posts: 8,584
|
4L I6 with LILPG
stuff having a ford with a little 2L 4cyl engine
__________________
Previous - BF XR6T - 325rwkw, 6 Speed Auto, Process West, X-Force and Turbosmart gear |
||
06-03-2011, 10:37 PM | #18 | |||
Mk5 Transbulance
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,910
|
Quote:
I would rather a diesel straight six for some serious pulling power. |
|||
06-03-2011, 09:21 AM | #19 | ||
[BU66OS]
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Coast NSW
Posts: 1,719
|
I chose 4l 6. There's something about having a 2l 4 that I don't think belongs in a Falcon, and I'd be a little embaressed to answer 'what engine did you get?' when I mention I bought a new Falcon.
IDK maybe I'm shallow and vain.
__________________
FG XR6 Turbo Nitro BA XR8 Manual
|
||
06-03-2011, 09:28 AM | #20 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Old Sydney Town
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
The IB4 will be a winner with fleets and government buyers, Ford just need to hurry up and release the bloddy thing ASAP. |
|||
06-03-2011, 09:36 AM | #21 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
|
|||
06-03-2011, 09:50 AM | #22 | |||
335 - STILL THE BOSS ...
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb East
Posts: 11,421
|
Quote:
__________________
'73 Landau - 10.82 @ 131mph '11 FG GT335 - 12.43 @ 116mph '95 XG ute - 3 minutes, 21.14 @ 64mph 101,436 MEMBERS ......... 101,436 OPINIONS ..... What could possibly go wrong! Clevo Mafia [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|||
06-03-2011, 09:56 AM | #23 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Barossa Valley, South Australia
Posts: 3,381
|
I need the option to select them both as I'm going to consider both of them later on in the year to replace the EL.
__________________
Cheers, Sam. |
||
07-04-2011, 02:59 PM | #24 | ||||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth N.O.R
Posts: 2,149
|
Quote:
Times are definitely a changing.
__________________
FM Mustang GT, manual - Daily driven Live, Love, RACE SOLD: AU III XR8 Quote:
|
||||
06-03-2011, 12:56 PM | #25 | |||
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
Quote:
|
|||
This user likes this post: |
06-03-2011, 01:57 PM | #26 | ||
I was correct - AGAIN
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 1,801
|
I am surprised to see so many people choose the 4cyl option. None of these voters have stated why they selected the 4cyl engine. I am interested to hear why these people would select the imported 4cyl over the local 6cyl.
|
||
06-03-2011, 02:38 PM | #27 | ||
Unintended Perfectionist
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brissy North
Posts: 2,196
|
I had an AU ute with dedicated LPG. Have also run a duel fuel BF V8, so its the direct injection 6 for sure.
__________________
BA-FG parts for sale. http://fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11411117 http://s1092.photobucket.com/user/my...?sort=3&page=1 The XR re-erection in the works http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11386452 |
||
06-03-2011, 03:39 PM | #28 | ||||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: WA
Posts: 308
|
Quote:
I haven't chosen yet, as I don't know the figures of each of these engines so need to do a bit of research. One thing that comes to mind though would be (I assume) more cabin space with the 4 cyl option. We've got an XR50 now (love it) but I was surprised at how much less rear seat leg room it had compared to our VY Commodore. Only reason I could come up with was the the V6 in the Commodore obviously takes up less room (lengthwise) than the straight 6, meaning more room for cabin space. I assume that the 4cyl would have a similar benefit. I agree with most here that having a 4cyl in a Falcon, just doesn't feel right, but if the performance figures are similar and the 4cyl provides me with a nicer cabin for the family to spend our travel time in, I'd have to seriously consider it. In the end head would probably win over heart. It would be a bit like choosing between these two engines; AU Falcon 5.0L V8, its figures were; Power: 175 kW Torque: 395 Nm FG Falcon N/A 4.0L 6cyl produces; Power: 195 kW Torque: 391 Nm Heart says V8 over V6, but factor in fuel consumption, emissions and outright power and head says V6. Edit: Its often hard to accept change, but progress usually means improvement.
__________________
Reality is an illusion caused by an excess of blood in the alcohol stream! Quote:
Last edited by AussieAV; 06-03-2011 at 03:45 PM. |
||||
06-03-2011, 04:49 PM | #29 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,412
|
Quote:
down torque characteristics as the I-6 so basically the same easy performance. 2) A lot of private buyers don't like LPG and the spare wheel stuck on the boot floor sucks. |
|||
24-06-2011, 10:09 AM | #30 | |||
Dunnydore Destroyer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
I HATE the smell of gas and will never buy a gas vehicle for that reason, the I4T engine is something I believe will be adequate for Falcon without being a Drag strip hero and will fill a void in a potential large car buyers checklist. FUEL ECONOMY!
__________________
______________________________________ "SKIN ON SKIN, LET THE LOVE BEGIN" |
|||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|