Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Ford Australia Vehicles > Small and Mid Sized Cars > Escort, Cortina, Sierra and Capri

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2005, 05:02 PM   #1
blitzmile
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 30
Default Escort Engine Choice

I'm planning to buy a mark1 Escort. I just want to know which engine would be best for the car. i plan to work the engine. ive been told a 2 L from a cortina would be good. any other suggestions? thanks

blitzmile is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-09-2005, 05:24 PM   #2
The MaDDeSTMaN
No longer driving a Ford.
 
The MaDDeSTMaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 2,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blitzmile
I'm planning to buy a mark1 Escort. I just want to know which engine would be best for the car. i plan to work the engine. ive been told a 2 L from a cortina would be good. any other suggestions? thanks
Lots of options available to you, it all depends how willing you are to make modifications to suit it.

You could easily put in a 2L OHC "pinto" from a Cortina or post '77 Escort, would require the least in the way of modification and be a huge upgrade from the 1.3 or 1.1 OHV "kent" engines usually found in the Mk 1 Escorts. Fuel injection could then be added to it, but really, it also depends what you want to do with it?

Many people have also put lots of other engines in there, including Fords Zetecs, modern Nissan EFI turbo and non-turbos, and I've even heard of V6s slotted in between the suspension towers.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by russellw
For those who get their jollies attacking other people let me remind you that we will not tolerate this here. If you want to do that then I am sure your presence would be welcomed elsewhere.
The MaDDeSTMaN is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-09-2005, 05:39 PM   #3
jonbays
TL40 Wagon?
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,377
Default

I used to muck around with GT cortinas and the 1600GT engine and close ratio box are a good thing in a light body mk1 escort. Everything fits easily too. If you have money the BDA twin cam engine would be classy.

The 2 litre from any late escort or cortina is a great idea and I have seen a turbo 2 litre in a late escort that was a real flyer.
jonbays is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-09-2005, 05:56 PM   #4
T_Terror
The Guy You Love To Hate
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vic
Posts: 1,203
Default

Nissan SR20 2.0litre turbo. Doubt youll find much better than that.

Or for a slightly more budget use a CA18. Less torque but they rev hard.
T_Terror is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-09-2005, 11:43 PM   #5
blitzmile
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 30
Default

i did want to use a ford engine. i should have explained myself a bit better. what i want to acheive is a decently quick car, like around 120 or more rear wheel kw. is this possible from a 2 Litre pinto thats NA if it is worked.
blitzmile is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-09-2005, 12:13 AM   #6
The MaDDeSTMaN
No longer driving a Ford.
 
The MaDDeSTMaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 2,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blitzmile
i did want to use a ford engine. i should have explained myself a bit better. what i want to acheive is a decently quick car, like around 120 or more rear wheel kw. is this possible from a 2 Litre pinto thats NA if it is worked.
Possibly, but you wouldn't want to drive it every day in heavy traffic, it wouldn't be nice to drive below 2000-2500rpm. I don't think you'd need THAT much power anyway, with a decent diff ratio, well maintained manual box and making sure it's kept nice and light, even 60rwkw would mean it would be fairly quick and would still be really easy to drive.

For reference, here is some video I recorded in my old (completely stock engine) 2L powered Escort (only mods were 3.77:1 diff and short shift kit), keep in mind this was AFTER the engine started giving trouble, also that it would have done much better if I'd revved it to a little over 2 grand before letting the clutch out fairly quickly: http://www.fordforums.com.au/photos/...cat=500&page=1
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by russellw
For those who get their jollies attacking other people let me remind you that we will not tolerate this here. If you want to do that then I am sure your presence would be welcomed elsewhere.
The MaDDeSTMaN is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-09-2005, 05:47 AM   #7
The Mighty Red
.
 
The Mighty Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_Terror
Nissan SR20 2.0litre turbo. Doubt youll find much better than that.

Or for a slightly more budget use a CA18. Less torque but they rev hard.
Yep my brother inlaw has a SR20 2.0T in his series1 RX7, one of his many toys, ( god i hate him lol) nah he's a nice bloke really , anyway the car featured in fast4's mag last year and is DAMN rite f*kin scary.

He has spent over $70k on this car and if you were going to do something like this you need a big budget.
Too put a sr20Tand driveline to handle the power you will get very little change out of $30k
You put one of these fully engineered engines in your car you can forget about the rest of your driveline it will all have to be replaced with serious hardware
If you have the money to go this way you would be more than happy with the results and frighten the Begeeezzzuuuss out of yourself and your mates .....LOL.........
__________________
---------------------------------------------
The Mighty Red is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-09-2005, 09:27 AM   #8
blitzmile
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 30
Default

the car wont be used everyday as ill have another car. more of a weekender, so drivability isnt too much of a problem. so if around 100rwkw or more is possible, does anyone have any idea what work would need to be done to acheive this?

maddestman, how much power was your pinto putting out in stock form?

cheers
blitzmile is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-09-2005, 01:06 PM   #9
damo351
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_Terror
Nissan SR20 2.0litre turbo. Doubt youll find much better than that.

Or for a slightly more budget use a CA18. Less torque but they rev hard.

I was going to suggest the SR20 ing_sm
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-09-2005, 12:05 AM   #10
Thornie
Off smelting
 
Thornie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: boyne island
Posts: 1,035
Default

302 winsor
Thornie is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-09-2005, 12:56 AM   #11
Walkinshaw
Two > One
 
Walkinshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaTTuS
302 winsor
WORD!
__________________
1978 LTD - 408ci - 11.5@120.6mph -
2004 S4 - 4.2 - M6 - quattro -

Walkinshaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-09-2005, 10:55 AM   #12
Gammaboy
Grinder+Welder = Race car
 
Gammaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Briz-Vegas
Posts: 3,937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walkinshaw
WORD!
Pfft! 351 Clevo with CHI heads
__________________
"No, it will never have enough power until I can spin the wheels at the end of the straightaway in high gear"
- Too much power is never enough....Mark Donohue on the Can Am Porsche 917.
Gammaboy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-09-2005, 11:12 AM   #13
TheSneakiness
Adapt or perish...
 
TheSneakiness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dip!@#$
Posts: 7,954
Default

What about sticking a Cosworth Turbo engine in it?
__________________
Carless
TheSneakiness is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-09-2005, 12:13 PM   #14
The MaDDeSTMaN
No longer driving a Ford.
 
The MaDDeSTMaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 2,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AUII_SE_Ute
What about sticking a Cosworth Turbo engine in it?
Mmmmmmmm Turbo cosworth... *drools all over keyboard* That would be my choice if I had the money...

Quote:
Originally Posted by blitzmile
the car wont be used everyday as ill have another car. more of a weekender, so drivability isnt too much of a problem. so if around 100rwkw or more is possible, does anyone have any idea what work would need to be done to acheive this?

maddestman, how much power was your pinto putting out in stock form?

cheers
You might find these threads interesting:
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=683
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=658

My pinto was completely stock, stock intake and exhaust too, and even had all the ADR 27A crap on it, so an educated guess would be that it would have been making around 65kw at the flywheel, perhaps a few more or less. Even with only a decent set of extractors, a good cam and a decent exhaust, given that the cars weigh less then 1000kgs, they can go suprisingly well, and they LOVE to rev. ;)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by russellw
For those who get their jollies attacking other people let me remind you that we will not tolerate this here. If you want to do that then I am sure your presence would be welcomed elsewhere.
The MaDDeSTMaN is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-09-2005, 01:45 PM   #15
Sourbastard
Moderator
Contributing Member
 
Sourbastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide SA
Posts: 5,584
Default

***Thread moved toe scort Forum***
__________________

1965 XP Falcon Deluxe Sedan
1978 XC Falcon Wagon Rallypack
2003 BA Fairlane G220

Windsor Powah!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7hT9dxD2hM

Sourbastard is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-09-2005, 07:40 PM   #16
rag top
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
rag top's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ACT
Posts: 4,028
Default

go the 2L pinto with a cossie twin cam head...
__________________
Current Rides:
2000 AU 5L XLS ute; 1970 Mustang project
rag top is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-09-2005, 12:07 AM   #17
mudduck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

boys me half way there i got sierra xr4ti not a cossie but it does neer 400hp its 2.3ltr turbo efi 28 pounds of boost motor still standed just bigger turbo an injecters goes mad beats alot new v8s today
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-09-2005, 08:23 PM   #18
blitzmile
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 30
Default

a 302 winsor would require an engineers certificate, right? this isnt a problem anyway as its going to be a weekend car. to reach over 100rwkw would this be the go or not?
blitzmile is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-09-2005, 11:07 PM   #19
rag top
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
rag top's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ACT
Posts: 4,028
Default

A 302 windsor in an esky would definately requrie an engineers certificate. Depending on where you are, it still might not be able to be registered.

If you want 100rwkw, why not turbo it instead? You'd most likely need engineers certificates, but you should be able to reach the 100rwkw target without sacrificing the handling abilities of the escort.
__________________
Current Rides:
2000 AU 5L XLS ute; 1970 Mustang project
rag top is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-09-2005, 11:13 PM   #20
The MaDDeSTMaN
No longer driving a Ford.
 
The MaDDeSTMaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 2,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by '67
A 302 windsor in an esky would definately requrie an engineers certificate. Depending on where you are, it still might not be able to be registered.

If you want 100rwkw, why not turbo it instead? You'd most likely need engineers certificates, but you should be able to reach the 100rwkw target without sacrificing the handling abilities of the escort.
I agree, there are a few turboed pintos getting around, and I think you'd be more then happy with it, not to mention it wouldn't ruin the weight balance like a V8 under the hood would - a V8 would be fine if you only go in a straight line, but as soon as you want to corner, just ask anyone who has driven a 6 cyl Cortina...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by russellw
For those who get their jollies attacking other people let me remind you that we will not tolerate this here. If you want to do that then I am sure your presence would be welcomed elsewhere.
The MaDDeSTMaN is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-09-2005, 11:29 PM   #21
Timmeh
Fairmont Ghia
 
Timmeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NSW
Posts: 2,144
Default

100rwkw is achieveable from an NA tune of the engine, where no engineers certificate is required, no costly turbo setup and plumbing involved, not to mention you'd prob want to EFI it (why bother turboing a carby setup, if you're gonna spend a couple grand might as well do the EFI mod too for better results).

People racing the Escorts were getting 220hp from the SOHC Pintos N/A (Darren Best who now races the ST170 in the Production Cars used to race Escorts and was telling me this), so getting 130hp at the treads is possible without resorting to boost, but a boosted engine will be more comfortable at 100rwkw than an N/A one. That power figure is nothing to a boosted engine, it wouldn't be working hard at all.

Tim
Timmeh is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-09-2005, 11:18 PM   #22
rota-eski
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

this guy i work with had an eski back in his day n he said this thing could smoke anything that rocked up next 2 him at the lights.
2L 'pinto' with the biggest cam u can find, twin 40mm webers, hav the head ported n polished, get the block oversized 20 thou n ull hav a recipe for disaster... or so he says anyways...
also, flicking through 1 of my hot4's mags i found an SR20 eski... dont even go there... its much more than just an engine... all ur driveline will need replacing because it wont line up or with blow, the original radiator location needs to be cut out n radiator mounted behind the grille, peadals (inc. clutch) need to be converted to hydraulic... after all that ur car needs to be able to withstand the torque or the whole chassis will twist, and u need it to stop.... with all that in mind.... keep it simple lol!! ;)
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-09-2005, 11:41 PM   #23
12
Silhouette AU1 TS50.
 
12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Radiator Springs, Victoria.
Posts: 2,135
Default

Here's a couple of pic's of an SR20DET in a MKII Escort. As you can see, plenty of room in front of the engine for the radiator. There's enough room for a decent sized intercooler in front of the radiator also.





The issue with the SR20 conversion is the Escort engine X member. The Escort engines had a rear oil sump, and the SR20 has a forward oil sump. And you cannot get a custom made rear sump for the SR20. The SR20 does fit in, but not easily. The Escort steering rack also gets in the way.
__________________
"People can have the Model T in any colour.. so long as it's black." HENRY FORD (30/07/1863 - 07/04/1947)

PIC'S OF MY
T1 TS50.
12 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-10-2005, 12:43 PM   #24
rota-eski
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

how about the gearbox and tunnel... there practically no room in the tunnel for a bigger box if u've got a manual escort? did u need to modify the tunnel aswell ???
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-10-2005, 02:50 PM   #25
12
Silhouette AU1 TS50.
 
12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Radiator Springs, Victoria.
Posts: 2,135
Default

That car is not mine, oh but how I wish it was.. : . Yes the tunnel needs to be larger if you have a manual, standard auto tunnel will except most Jap (Nissan, Toyota) 5 speeds.
__________________
"People can have the Model T in any colour.. so long as it's black." HENRY FORD (30/07/1863 - 07/04/1947)

PIC'S OF MY
T1 TS50.
12 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-10-2005, 10:41 PM   #26
blitzmile
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 30
Default

hopefully tomororow ill be picking up a pinto engine. does anyone know of any books about performance mods that can be done to the engine, like porting etc. ?
blitzmile is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-10-2005, 11:04 PM   #27
The MaDDeSTMaN
No longer driving a Ford.
 
The MaDDeSTMaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 2,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blitzmile
hopefully tomororow ill be picking up a pinto engine. does anyone know of any books about performance mods that can be done to the engine, like porting etc. ?
The bible when it comes to modding a pinto is a book called "How to modify Fords 2.0L OHC Engine by David Vizard" or something like that, I've got it somewhere. If you can get your hands on this book, although it's a little dated now, it's well worth getting.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by russellw
For those who get their jollies attacking other people let me remind you that we will not tolerate this here. If you want to do that then I am sure your presence would be welcomed elsewhere.
The MaDDeSTMaN is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-10-2005, 10:21 AM   #28
blitzmile
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 30
Default

does it include sections on how to port the engine?
blitzmile is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-10-2005, 10:33 AM   #29
The MaDDeSTMaN
No longer driving a Ford.
 
The MaDDeSTMaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 2,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blitzmile
does it include sections on how to port the engine?
It certainly does have a lot on the best ways to optimise flow through the heads by porting, as well as discussing the merits of replacing the heads with various others. It has sections on forced induction (both turbo and super charging), optimum exhaust designs, different carby set-ups, the whole lot. DEFIANTLY worth getting if you're serious about working with these engines.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by russellw
For those who get their jollies attacking other people let me remind you that we will not tolerate this here. If you want to do that then I am sure your presence would be welcomed elsewhere.
The MaDDeSTMaN is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-11-2005, 06:09 AM   #30
banarcus
hmm eyebrows
 
banarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lower Hunter Valley, NSW
Posts: 2,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The MaDDeSTMaN
The bible when it comes to modding a pinto is a book called "How to modify Fords 2.0L OHC Engine by David Vizard" or something like that, I've got it somewhere. If you can get your hands on this book, although it's a little dated now, it's well worth getting.
Yes I can vouch for that book. In the end my esky was dynoed at 127hp at the rears. I ported the heads myself, I tried the apple port setup without the play dough inside, burtons vernier cam wheel, dave vizard valves etc
__________________
XE 4.9 Falcon S & XA 4.9 Fairmont hardtop
banarcus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL