Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2005, 11:27 PM   #1
Aussie Pete
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Using a Mobile Phone Is Worth Three Points

But look at the 2003 NSW RTA Road Crash stats.

Table 12 lists Factors Contributing to a crash.

Degree of Crash
Units in Numbers
Fatal/Injury/Non-Injury/Total

Tyres: 4/91/204/299
Using Handheld Phone: 0/7/16/23
Distraction In Vehicle (Not Phone): 0/261/463/724 (let's take licences off all smokers and anyone who eats/drinks!)

So, the amount of crashes caused by faulty tyres (you have to assume a lot of those were due to things like underinflation, excessive wear, overloading and so on) and resulting in injury was 13 times that of using a phone. And an amazingly similar 12.75 times for non-injury crashes. In the case of deaths the difference is infinite because of course not one single person was killed due to using their phone but 7 dies due to probably never looking at their tyres.

How many people get demerit points for bald tyres running on steel or canvas?

Why the hysteria over people using phones in cars? Where's the real story on why this has become such a major source of punitive punishment?

(source; NSW RTA Road Crash Stats 2003)

Last edited by Aussie Pete; 10-04-2005 at 11:28 PM.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 12:36 AM   #2
XplosiveR6
Viper FG XR6 Turbo
 
XplosiveR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 858
Default

well there may not have been many phone related crashes, but people driving while on the phone **** me off, they miss breaks in the traffic when turning, swerve over to the other lane, i have had people behind me brake very late while on the phone. as alot of them are simpley are not concerntrating enough on the road, i am surprised there hasent been more phone related crashes
XplosiveR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 12:53 AM   #3
JC
Miami Pilot
Donating Member2
 
JC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 21,704
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

EF_Dave - I agree. I have had the same sort of things happen, and it's always you that has to take corrective action, as the other party is too busy....on the phone! Also had one woman applying makeup up on a 3 lane carriageway at 80km/h - she was swerving between the inside two lanes, so I got around her as quick as I could.

AP - I know where you are coming from, and while I sometimes use the phone without a handsfree kit, I am probably more qualified than some to do this as I have a third hand. Sorry, no, that's not it, I am a smoker and am used to this habit distracting me while I am driving. :

I reckon I could come up with a list of 6 things that are more dangersou than speeding, or driving while using the phone, but waht's the point? If it's to hard to "police", the government won't enforce it. Speeding is easy to measure (radar/laser/speed camera), talking on a phone is easy to catch (it's pretty obvious you are holding something to your ear), but things like picking bald tyres on a moving car are not so easy. Either is picking someone who is just plainly incompetant (you know, those that give way to the right until the sun comes up, those that merge on to a 100km/h road, but they try doing it at 60 km/h, those that sit in the RH lane on 90km/h+ roads and killany chance of traffic flow, etc). If it's too hard for the cops to do, they know they're not goin to make much money out of it, so they pick on the things that are easy to enforce. Why do you think we now have mobile vehicle inspections - it's because the cops wouldn't know a bald tyre from a slick! (apologies to all coppers on this forum - being a member of the forum probably means you do know a thing or two about cars, but most coppers don't. I still remember the Vic copper who looked at a s/c car at last year's FPV day and commented on the fact that the car was turbo'd).

What was my point? Dunno. Good night.
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hammer: FG GTE | 376rwkw | 1/4 mile 11.793 @ 119.75mph 1.733 60' (4408lb)
1 of 60 FG MK1 335 GTEs (1 of 118 FG Mk 1 & 2 335 GTEs).
Mods: Tune, HSD/ShockWorks, black GT335 19” staggered replicas with 245 & 275/35/19 Michelin Pilot sport 5s

Daily: BF2 Fairmont Ghia I6 ZF, machine face GT335 19” staggered Replicas with 245s and 275s, Bilsteins & Kings

FPV 335 build stats: <click here>

Ford Performance Club ACT

Last edited by JC; 11-04-2005 at 01:06 AM.
JC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 10:10 AM   #4
b2tf
not here much anymore
 
b2tf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JCXR8
I am probably more qualified than some to do this as I have a third hand. Sorry, no, that's not it, I am a smoker and am used to this habit distracting me while I am driving.
Somehow i highly doubt that, and somehow i dont think Constable Plod would see it that way either. Nobody can be 'qualified' to break the law over anybody else.
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
b2tf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 12:02 PM   #5
james
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by back2thefutura
Nobody can be 'qualified' to break the law over anybody else.

you know how many police i have seen using mobile phones and driving and some of them were even laughing on the phone while using it.

So i dont see how they were doing a proper job.

im sick of this one sided bullshit they govt carries on with.

One set of rules for them another set for us
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 04:06 PM   #6
Mike Gayner
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Mike Gayner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 1,488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by james
you know how many police i have seen using mobile phones and driving and some of them were even laughing on the phone while using it.

So i dont see how they were doing a proper job.

im sick of this one sided bullshit they govt carries on with.

One set of rules for them another set for us
Police officers go through very intense driver training courses, and are trained to drive while using phones and RT radios.
Mike Gayner is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 07:43 PM   #7
Aussie Pete
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Gayner
Police officers go through very intense driver training courses, and are trained to drive while using phones and RT radios.
LOL. :lookedat:

Honestly, being a truckie and having it in my blood (although not my profession now) I learnt to change gears, steer, talk on the CB and talk on the phone simultaneously. My proficiency became rather impressive after some time and most truckies can do this without issue. But of course this 'training' doesn't qualify them to talk on a phone.

A human is a human.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 09:09 PM   #8
UNR8D
FORMER T3 OWNER
 
UNR8D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,241
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Gayner
Police officers go through very intense driver training courses, and are trained to drive while using phones and RT radios.
LOL your kidding arnt you? why would it be less of a distraction to them than to us? do they have superhuman powers? i think not! the more u believe this buracratic bullshit the stupider the replys are? how are they more trained and more responsible to talk on a phone then the next person who has done advanced or performance driver training??? ohh thats right you ARNT taught to drive like that at all.

everyone stuffs up and they are not invincible to this at all... be interesting how easily it is covered up though if they ever did crash while on a mobile.....
__________________
Mischief.TV

you can sleep in your car, but you cant drift your house...
UNR8D is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-04-2005, 06:10 PM   #9
devil cv8
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JCXR8
, and while I sometimes use the phone without a handsfree kit, I am probably more qualified than some to do this as I have a third hand. Sorry, no, that's not it, I am a smoker and am used to this habit distracting me while I am driving. :
you know the answer to this.... treat smoking while driving the same as using a mobile while driving...
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 05:26 AM   #10
Mike Gayner
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Mike Gayner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 1,488
Default

I hate cell phone users in cars, it ****es me off and as far as I'm concerned they deserve the punishment and then some. Why should we have to wait for the crashes, injuries and fatalities to skyrocket before we do something about it? Isn't that a bit like putting the ambulance at the bottom of the hill?
Mike Gayner is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 06:47 AM   #11
Yaw
Ford Fanatic
 
Yaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,480
Default

I don't believe its using a phone as in talking on it, its the people that try to sms whilst driving.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to my Opinion
2007 Territory TX SY RWD Ego
Yaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 07:22 AM   #12
bindi
Redhead extraordinaire...
 
bindi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 2,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yaw
I don't believe its using a phone as in talking on it, its the people that try to sms whilst driving.
Well I have stopped the talking habit completely while driving cos although I had a hands free earphone thingy, I still find it distracting.

I made up my mind the last time I did it cos I realised that I had no real recollection of driving from the point where I answered the phone to where I hung up. It was then that I decided from that point on, wherever practicable I shall pull over.

I also just bought a phone with a loudspeaker. I have no problems talking to my kids/hubby/passengers in the car, so I am going to try the phone with the loudspeaker next time to see if that's any better.

SMSing while driving is atrociously distracting. I just don't do it anymore, plain and simple.

I'm on the road to drive.
__________________
Bindi
88 EA- his car
88 Rolla - MY car

Quote:
Originally Posted by big_waity
Oh, and another surefire symptom will be the Falcon badge at the back.
bindi is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 06:54 PM   #13
AUIII XR8 MAN
DJR TM#54
 
AUIII XR8 MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: on my p.c now with internet! ok i'll still use works internet too.
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bindi
Well I have stopped the talking habit completely while driving cos although I had a hands free earphone thingy, I still find it distracting.

SMSing while driving is atrociously distracting. I just don't do it anymore, plain and simple.
I see this this happen to often with car going onto the wrong side of the road or drifting into another lane with people trying to miss them & they end up in a addicent with the person on the phone driving off with out a mark on thier car.
I seen some poeple walk into thing, injuring them self because they are on the mobile phone.
__________________
When traveling to V8 Supercar rounds, i book through KYLEE MOLE Travel agents, She Goes, She Goes, She Goes & I just went.
Now Zetec Powered. 1.6lt of madness. But the XR8 still remains
AUIII XR8 MAN is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 07:26 AM   #14
Stav
Smile
 
Stav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Merrylands Sydney
Posts: 8,541
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always ready to help others over the years on AFF with advice and tips along the way 
Default

I think skimpily dressed women are just as dangerous.I got hit by 2 semi trailers cause of a woman with tight shorts.I did not even get a chance to see after all that.

People should not be holding a phone and steering.They are a big risk.I think licence disqualification should be brought into effect.
__________________
Stingray Car Security ph 0414445444

Single din radio fascias for fg to fgx fords Australia wide .

FG 1 2 and 3 gauge holder in stock now! https://stingraycar.com.au/shop/
Site Sponsor See Sponsor Stingray Car Security 😍👌✌

AU wagon 6 14.241@96.75 1/4 mile sold.Octane fg xr6 turbo!! 12.312 112.21 mph home tune f6 injectors gone ..now in nitro fgxr6t ready to go again
Stav is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 12:07 PM   #15
EA2BA
PM me if you want
 
EA2BA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pk Ranger Modding - QLD 👍
Posts: 7,498
Default

Police are considered trained to drive and talk on a mobile phone, the general public are not.

They say talking on the phone and driving reduces the thinking ability of an adult to that of about a 5 year old.
__________________
Owner of first ever car to retrofit BA SSS - the EA2BA

Send me a PM if you want to know anything

2010 Ford Ranger PK High Rider (Auto) - 2011 Ford Fiesta (Auto)
EA2BA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 12:12 PM   #16
james
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

well that fits in line with the police in this area. 5 yr olds.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 03:03 PM   #17
deesun
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
deesun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,167
Default

There will probably never be correct numbers on how many accidents are caused by talking on the phone cos who's going to own up to it without a witness. "No officer I wasn't talking on my phone at the time I just didn't see the other car".
__________________
igodabigblackshinycar and I relented and allowed a BMW into the garage.
deesun is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 03:11 PM   #18
Trevor 57
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Trevor 57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,769
Default

Latest research from the good old USA says that "distraction" is responsible for 20% of all fatal and serious motor vehicle accidents.

Interestingly, the same stats said that there was NO difference in talking on a phone held to your ear versus talking on one hands free. They are both as equally distracting.

USA information though.
__________________
I reserve the right to arm bears
Trevor 57 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 03:44 PM   #19
Tote
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Tote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Near Canberra
Posts: 884
Default

As an aside, in California it is legal to drive with a handheld mobile and it is easy to spot the people doing it who are weaving all over the road. We're assuming the ones without a phone must be ****ed.
Having said that the research above would need to be carefully inspected as there is currently a big push to outlaw driving whilst on the phone, thats usually a good time for a supporting study to pop up.
Regards,
Tote
__________________
Go Home, Your Igloo is on Fire....
Tote is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 04:48 PM   #20
davocol
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
davocol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 723
Default

I think the problem with these statistics would be admission of guilt, I am extremely suprised anyone would admit to using a mobile phone following an accident.
__________________
SZ Territory Titanium
davocol is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 04:53 PM   #21
MRJUCY
Fordless
 
MRJUCY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,122
Default

I'm not having a go or saying this is a good or bad thing but Police in NSW don't get a great deal of driver training. There is several different courses they can do depending on there job in police but most don't & I don't beleive talking on a mobile while driving is part of there instruction but they are allowed by law to talk on there phone while driving.
MRJUCY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 05:13 PM   #22
kiwikid
have you seen my marbles?
 
kiwikid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: land of oz
Posts: 570
Default

iv been through the training for using radios and limiting destractions, does that mean i can drive whilst on the mobile?
__________________
comfortably numb...
kiwikid is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 07:45 PM   #23
Aussie Pete
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bottom line guys. The stats show it ain't the problem. We have to stop basing our laws on our hatreds and our perceived views. The current hysteria over speeding and lowering limits hasn't paid off because it is based on the hatred and perceptions of people that have pedestrian interests at the fore. And nancy Camry driving CEOs of groups like the RTA.

Look at the figures. It's not about admission. How many people admitted they were speeding in the stats???
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2005, 08:36 PM   #24
T_Terror
The Guy You Love To Hate
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vic
Posts: 1,203
Default

Agreed its ridiculous. 3 points? BAH!

Suggestions? What can we apart from vote?
T_Terror is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL