Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15-10-2011, 11:32 PM   #1
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Question FG wagon - what would it have been?

Now before anyone gets their knickers in a twist, I know full well there isn't and never will be another Falcon wagon, what I would like to explore is an alternate future which assumes there would have been.

What would an FG wagon have been?

Would it have been a rebodied B-series car with leaf springs and a LWB platform, or something more like the Commode Sportwagon on the sedan platform with IRS?

Having just spent the past 2 weeks tooling around in an AU wagon, I now realise how useful the old wagon actually was. That load space will swallow a lot of crap. And as for the leaf sprung v IRS argument - who cares. The average wagon buyer isn't buying a wagon for its handling prowess and probably wouldn't even notice the difference between the two under normal driving conditions. Henceforth I reckon Ford could have gotten away with offering an FG wagon on a LWB platform with leaf springs. But the old wagon's downfall was, quite simply, it wasn't stylish, and physical attraction is the first obstacle to any successful 'relationship'. If it was a stylish little (or large) number, it may have been a winner.

What say you? What would it have been?

__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-10-2011, 11:39 PM   #2
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Ive heard an FG wagon had been styled but not approved and given Holdens new direction theres every possibility Ford wouldve followed, however looking back at previous Falcon wagons, theyve got a distinct familiarity about them in the rear end going back to the EA wagon. Because of that i find it hard to believe that when Ford are having to spend less on the mainstream models, they'd spend more on the niche models than they have in the past, which surely would have to be the case to produce a Falcon wagon drastically different from its forebear. It may have still looked good though, i know theres plenty of AU wagons that with the right treatment look nice but i cant say i see too many nice looking BA wagons. They may have managed to restyle the whole bodyside whilst maintaining the inner structure as much as possible.
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-10-2011, 11:44 PM   #3
Revolver
Big Member
Donating Member1
 
Revolver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SE Qld
Posts: 5,874
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

A Flop. According to Ford Australia.

Sorry. Had to say it.
__________________
The Scarlet Fairlane: 94 5.Slow Litre NC II Fairlane 488800kms & Climbing
Rollin' on genuine ELGT wheels.
K&N Filter
/////Alpine Sound.
EBGT Momo Woodgrain Steering Wheel
The Scarlet Fairlane Build Thread

Project "White Knight"
93 ED XR6
ROH Alloys
Momo wheel
Cruise
Sunroof
Premo Sound
Manual
HO Goodies
PWK Build Thread

1990 Yamaha FZR 250: 59000ks & climbing. New fairing, old tank, my angry mosquito in a coffee tin! 14.977 1/4mile.

Last edited by Revolver; 15-10-2011 at 11:50 PM.
Revolver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 12:40 AM   #4
SSD-85
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,142
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

According to many Joe Citizens, A knock-off of the VE wagon. Which in itself is a knock off of the 300C. But its a Holden, so no one cares.

I reckon Ford wouldve had a better chance with a FG coupe. Not to ruffle feathers....
SSD-85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 12:50 AM   #5
FPVGT500
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FPVGT500's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 640
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Got to say with what holden did with the sportwagon is sensational, you could even order a hsv wagon and for once a wagon actually looked nice......
FPVGT500 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 04:02 PM   #6
Thornie
Off smelting
 
Thornie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: boyne island
Posts: 1,035
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FPVGT500
Got to say with what holden did with the sportwagon is sensational, you could even order a hsv wagon and for once a wagon actually looked nice......
Sportswagon is the one thing that would make me buy a holden over a ford.
Thornie is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 04:08 PM   #7
pottery beige
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 18,988
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaTTuS
Sportswagon is the one thing that would make me buy a holden over a ford.
yes.. it would.. a RWD sportish.. gruntish.. SWG.......
pottery beige is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 07:54 AM   #8
Yellow_Festiva
Where to next??
 
Yellow_Festiva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8,893
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

I wonder.... how desirable have would a LPI wagon have been to taxi buyers?

How many Commy wagons were bought by fleets / government etc? If a Ford wagon was produced that could carry more and be 'greener' would that have taken their sales?

I think it's too later IMO. With the constant talk of the downfall of the full size car, a wagon probably would not earn Ford its development money back, especially with the new Territory.
Yellow_Festiva is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 08:10 AM   #9
fmc351
let it burn
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: QUEENSLANDER!!!!!
Posts: 2,866
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow_Festiva
... especially with the new Territory.
Key point IMO. Territory is the wagon.

I think it is obvious considering they dropped it, that if they instead went ahead and built a wagon it would probably have been a BF with a grafted FG front. Given they dropped it, the decision would have been marginal to continue so unlikely given past practice to completely redesign the body. I didnt have an issue with the wagons (owned a couple), never liked the XD-F series they were too much like a hearse IMO, but the EL was a nice looking wagon, bugger even the EA wasnt all that bad and the cargo space was HUGE. Leaf springs was an advantage to me anyway as I bought them to use as wagons and often they had weight in them for months on end, coils would sag in no time.

I actually dont understand why more families dont buy wagons, apart from thats their choice. Throw a couple of push bikes in the back, some picnic gear, and/or fishing rods and gear, couple of kids and even a dog. So easy and still easy to drive and park around town.

Even as an 18 yr old there are advantages to wagons over sedans. Dont bother knockin.
fmc351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 06:51 PM   #10
Resurrection
I was correct - AGAIN
 
Resurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 1,801
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow_Festiva
I wonder.... how desirable have would a LPI wagon have been to taxi buyers?

How many Commy wagons were bought by fleets / government etc? If a Ford wagon was produced that could carry more and be 'greener' would that have taken their sales?

I think it's too later IMO. With the constant talk of the downfall of the full size car, a wagon probably would not earn Ford its development money back, especially with the new Territory.
A FG wagon with proper payload would have been extremely popular with fleets and the EcoLPI version would have no problems accommodating a full sized spare tyre. The Territory agrument is flawed as I know people who want a Falcon wagon but don't want or see the Ford Territory as the alternative.
Resurrection is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 06:54 PM   #11
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resurrection
A FG wagon with proper payload would have been extremely popular with fleets and the EcoLPI version would have no problems accommodating a full sized spare tyre. The Territory agrument is flawed as I know people who want a Falcon wagon but don't want or see the Ford Territory as the alternative.
So what did they buy or are driving right now?
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-12-2011, 05:07 PM   #12
Resurrection
I was correct - AGAIN
 
Resurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 1,801
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist
So what did they buy or are driving right now?
So far two have selected a Territory and one a Commodore Sportswagon.
Resurrection is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 08:13 AM   #13
EB#
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
EB#'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Coast, NSW
Posts: 4,012
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Constant helpful advice and step by step guides in easy to understand format with pictures. 
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

EB# is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 10:15 AM   #14
2011G6E
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
2011G6E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EB92
It would have been like that...and given people an alternative to the Sportswagon. The Territory isn't a "Falcon wagon"...it's seen as a "four wheel drive" type vehicle, something completely different, appealing to an entirely different buying sector. The ordinary man-in-the-street sees cars as beung in a few basic classes...sedan, wagon, four wheel drive/SUV. If they want a wagon, most people won't turn to an SUV, no matter how good it is...they want a "wagon"...a car with a bit tacked on the back.
Ford dropped the ball big time by dropping the wagon and just assuming people would automatically swap over to buying a Territory...I know plenty of "Ford guys" who lament the loss of the wagon, and don't really know what to turn to for their next family wagon...they don,t want a four wheel drive, and if you mention Territory, they just lump it in with four wheel drives...they want a Falcon wagon.
2011G6E is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 10:44 AM   #15
Elks
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
Elks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,523
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EB92
I like it. That would be a cool niche filler in between Falcon sedan and Territory.

The good folk seem to forget the is no large car market as such, but dozens of little segments that make up the market as a whole. Contrarily Holden have the ability to pick the niches mastered.
__________________
Oooh baby living in Miami....
Elks is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 10:48 AM   #16
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,359
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elks
I like it. That would be a cool niche filler in between Falcon sedan and Territory.

The good folk seem to forget the is no large car market as such, but dozens of little segments that make up the market as a whole. Contrarily Holden have the ability to pick the niches mastered.
Which is why Ford needs to find different niches where the possibility of less competition ans success are better,
take for example Territory against captiva and an existing Mondeo S/W against Sportwagon, a choice in segments
sees Holden import Captiva where Ford imports mondeo Stationwagon... but what happens when Malibu arrives?
Will Malibu add to holden's sales or canabalize from Commodore and Cruze buyers shifting withing Holden's range...

IMO, the real battle begins with new Ranger-Colorado-Hilux and their new SUV variants.
If all three makers get their diesel SUVs right we might see an even bigger swing away from large sedans...
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-10-2011, 12:52 PM   #17
DENKO
Bseries hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Epping
Posts: 1,490
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EB92
If thats what it would of looked like, i would buy 1 in a heart beat!!
__________________
HISTORY:
AU series 2 S pack manual
BA XR6 mock up [FLINBY]
BF MKII XR8, 13.8 @ 107mph
BA MKII F6 TYPHOON
BA MKII XR6 TURBO

BF MKII F6 TYPHOON R-spec, 13.2 @ 109 mph [LTHLF-6]
PX Ranger WILDTRAK
DENKO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 08:17 AM   #18
EB#
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
EB#'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Coast, NSW
Posts: 4,012
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Constant helpful advice and step by step guides in easy to understand format with pictures. 
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

EB# is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 08:17 AM   #19
EB#
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
EB#'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Coast, NSW
Posts: 4,012
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Constant helpful advice and step by step guides in easy to understand format with pictures. 
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

EB# is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 04:49 PM   #20
Venomous1
5.0 means business
 
Venomous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Busselton, Western Australia
Posts: 1,023
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EB92
This is really good looking this against the Sportwagons would have been excellent. Missed opportunity.
__________________
Windsor V8 Enthusiast!
Turbo Barra Lover!
Venomous1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 05:06 PM   #21
pottery beige
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 18,988
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venomous1
This is really good looking this against the Sportwagons would have been excellent. Missed opportunity.
bigtime......
pottery beige is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 10:16 AM   #22
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Those FG sportwagon chops look quite bizzare.

I still think that Ford could have done a leaf sprung wagon 'on the cheap' but I guess the volume of the Territory outweighs anything the wagon could have ever dreamed of obtaining.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 10:33 AM   #23
kaniSS
BIG MEMBER ;)
 
kaniSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 940
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

I don't like it at all. They look like funeral cars.
__________________
2010 FG XR6T, EGO, MANUAL, LUXURY PACK.
kaniSS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 10:45 AM   #24
MAGPIE
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MAGPIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Shakey Isles
Posts: 3,428
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaniSS
I don't like it at all. They look like funeral cars.
Well they always were anyway, if it looks like a hearse, handles like a hearse it probably is a hearse.

Falcon wagons have always been popular as body transporters.
MAGPIE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 11:03 AM   #25
Brazen
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Brazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

I always thought they would go the reskinned BF route but knowing the data they had on hand from Commodore sales I wouldnt actually be suprised if they were going a sport wagon route. Looking at Holden with almost 40% of Commodores being wagon there was certainly the market there for a sporty wagon. In fact on pure returns I am sure if they looked at average transaction prices the sporty wagon would look have looked very convincing. They make a killing on them.



When I was shopping for a car I could get brand new XR6 sedans for 31,000 drivaway, the best I could get for a SV6 sportwagon was 41,000 driveaway, thats $10,000 extra cash per vehicle and a big waiting list as they were selling every one they build. I wouldnt be suprised if Ford were seriously considering going down the sport wagon route with all that info.

What I suspect is that the wagon would have therefore been built on the sedan wheelbase but still with a larger cargo area than the Holden to fit LPG gear and to counter act the biggest complaint of the Holden that the cargo area was too small.

Somehow I dont think they were considering a re-skinned BF as they probably would of just done it as its cheap and it gets the volumes up, I am sure if they went this route though it still would have been a full lineup of G6, G6E, XR6 etc.
Brazen is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 10:41 AM   #26
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,359
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior
Those FG sportwagon chops look quite bizzare.

I still think that Ford could have done a leaf sprung wagon 'on the cheap' but I guess the volume of the Territory outweighs anything the wagon could have ever dreamed of obtaining.
On the cheap being the underscored text becuse Ford saw the Stationwagon as tools of trade.

Now compare that perception with what's happened over at Holden where sport wagon and Ute
are mostly bought as mid and high series vehicles usually with a V8 option...

When holden introduced the sportwagon, it heavily canabalized sedan sales but I suspect that was
because VZ wagon buyers moved to VE sedan but really wanted the wagon back and moved accordingly.

What Ford is concerned about is spending on a wagon only to have it heavily canabalize Falcon sedan sales.
The diesel Mondeo Station wagon saved approx $300M to $400M in development costs wile giving
250-300 sales/mth, now that is what i call getting bang for your buck and still saving a packet too...
While Ford fans mightn't like that decision, it allows Ford to remain profitable in the near future....
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 11:10 AM   #27
Brazen
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Brazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
What Ford is concerned about is spending on a wagon only to have it heavily canabalize Falcon sedan sales.
The diesel Mondeo Station wagon saved approx $300M to $400M in development costs wile giving
250-300 sales/mth, now that is what i call getting bang for your buck and still saving a packet too...

The Holden wagon cost 130m and that was tested and designed to expensive US design and crash standards if it was to be sold there. It was also an all-new wagon not based on VZ at all. I suspect a FG wagon simply reskinned BF with a full lineup of variants would have cost 50m to 80m, with a sportwagon costing up to 100m. The Territory cost 500m and that was with its marketing studies, new design, steering, suspensions, body, interior and all wheel drive systems and awd testing around the world. A wagon is a sedan simply with changes to the rear sheet metal, its relatively cheap.
Brazen is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 11:27 PM   #28
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,359
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brazen
The Holden wagon cost 130m and that was tested and designed to expensive US design and crash standards if it was to be sold there. .
Interesting because the FG wagon was supposedly to have a long wheelbase, possibly longer doors and definitly a new rear

Last edited by jpd80; 16-10-2011 at 11:35 PM.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 11:15 AM   #29
Jim Goose
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

The Holdens sportwagon, while it looks good, is pretty small in terms of cargo space. So you end up with a car which weights a bit more then the sedan but isnt really useful??

Putting flame suit on... how about instead of a falcon wagon (which apparently looks like a hearse... or a restyled short body wagon which then everyone says looks like a commodore sportwagon) Ford makes a hatchback type? Anyone good with photoshop?
Since small hatchbacks seem popular with females, would a large family type hatch be a seller?
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions??

Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole....
Jim Goose is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-10-2011, 11:19 AM   #30
Brazen
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Brazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
Default Re: FG wagon - what would it have been?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Goose

Putting flame suit on... how about instead of a falcon wagon (which apparently looks like a hearse... or a restyled short body wagon which then everyone says looks like a commodore sportwagon) Ford makes a hatchback type? Anyone good with photoshop?
Since small hatchbacks seem popular with females, would a large family type hatch be a seller?

Works for Mondeo! Its actually not a bad idea as it could appeal to both sedan and wagon buyers to an extent but only costs you the development of one bodystyle (if you were to only have one).
Brazen is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL