Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-05-2005, 08:52 PM   #1
BLSTIC
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 664
Default Mate wants a race

One of my mates want to race me, and he has a VP ute with a mild exhaust (2.25 inch, single system, no extractors) (160,000 kays on it), and im just wanting to know whether i should take up the challenge or not.

I have a 312,000km EF Futura. Bog standard.

I know that the VP has 120-something kw, and my car has around 150, but his ute is lighter.

*its a legal race down the 1/8 mile at Morgan Park, Warwick.

should i race the guy?

or more to the point, will i beat him. (both are 4spd autos)

thanks
Ben
BLSTIC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 08:53 PM   #2
dansedgli
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
dansedgli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,359
Default

No go hide in your hidey hole instead.

What are you scared of? Just race him.
__________________
Turbo AU ute ~ Nice legs, shame about the face. 282rwkw at 15psi.
dansedgli is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 08:54 PM   #3
Damo
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,078
Default

he will probably beat you especialy on 1/8 mile, but you should have fun anyway. Go for it!
Damo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 08:56 PM   #4
Walkinshaw
Two > One
 
Walkinshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
Default

over 1/8th you will be had i think. Over a 1/4 you may pull him in.
__________________
1978 LTD - 408ci - 11.5@120.6mph -
2004 S4 - 4.2 - M6 - quattro -

Walkinshaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 08:59 PM   #5
AdzT3-146
own the road
 
AdzT3-146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,764
Default

yeah as the others have said he'd probably beat you down the 1/8th but go for it anyway
__________________
T3 TE50 #146


Quote:
Originally Posted by UNR8D
Id rather date a goat with syphilous then drive a maloo.
AdzT3-146 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 09:03 PM   #6
mcflux
Banned
Donating Member1
 
mcflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
Default

I raced a mate over an 1/8 mile track recently and was surprised with the results! Yes, our times weren't the best (equal PBs of 10.32 each) but we were pretty much even for every race (50/50 win/loss + close always)

Mild 351 straight petrol with T5 & 3.23 gears (XC) vs (EB) near-stock 302 with auto & 3.27 gears. I was expecting to get my *** handed to me but was pleasently surprised. You never know if you never go!

Anyhoo, there's fun to be had Legal racing is the bestest!

-Dave-
mcflux is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 09:05 PM   #7
BLSTIC
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 664
Default

alright so ill race the bloke
im kinda hoping that he just flattens it off the line and smokes up.

cya
Ben
BLSTIC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 09:08 PM   #8
neb
hibernating
 
neb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,135
Default

should be fairly close... good luck!
neb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 10:01 PM   #9
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

I don't think a stock-pre VS 6cyl auto will beat a stock-post EF 6cyl auto at anything. 125kW 3.8 V6 vs 157kW 4.0? Plus the 4.0's extra torque...

But yeah, go race, enjoy yourself!
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 11:02 PM   #10
donno
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
donno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 691
Default

Yeah but gay 1st gear plus 3.08 diff. It'll probably still be in 1st at the finish line lol.
__________________
93 ED Futura, I6, KKK500r Turbo, Dev 5 head, custom Surecam, TKO500, Lokka. 250rwkw@4000rpm, 9psi, and lots of boost taper.

Comming soon: T04Z, plenum, TrueTrac.
donno is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 11:10 PM   #11
MITCHAY
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,465
Default

I dont get why people have autos if they plan to race them. Could someone explain this as im noticing that a fair amount of people have autos. Do your guys drive them through the gears or leave them in drive? I wouldnt care if i won or lost it would be the rush that counts. Legal speeding has got to be good
MITCHAY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 11:17 PM   #12
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Automatic is faster for drag racing.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 11:30 PM   #13
dansedgli
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
dansedgli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steffo
Automatic is faster for drag racing.
But with falcons you need a fair bit of power to make the launch any good.

For example in my turbo EB which ran 13.6 @ 105mph my 60' times were only 2.5 seconds which I have to attibute to the poor gearing of first.

For 'most' 6 cylinder falcons without a high stall a manual would be much better as the ability to launch hard outweighs the drawback of manually changing through the gears. Im still yet to see a 13 second auto 6 cylinder falcon.

But generally yes an auto is better for quarter mile action. I love my autos!!
__________________
Turbo AU ute ~ Nice legs, shame about the face. 282rwkw at 15psi.
dansedgli is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 11:49 PM   #14
MITCHAY
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,465
Default

But the manual will get it off the line faster right? My mate has a 280ZX auto. He gets smashed off the line but once in high speeds all people can do is wave as he passes them. In some cases rapes them completely.
MITCHAY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2005, 11:57 PM   #15
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MITCHAY
But the manual will get it off the line faster right? My mate has a 280ZX auto. He gets smashed off the line but once in high speeds all people can do is wave as he passes them. In some cases rapes them completely.
Gearing and traction is what gets you off the line. And in high power, highly modified applications, manual is slower at everything acceleration related. Nothing beats a modded, stalled auto.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 12:03 AM   #16
MITCHAY
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steffo
Gearing and traction is what gets you off the line. And in high power, highly modified applications, manual is slower at everything acceleration related. Nothing beats a modded, stalled auto.
Hmm interesting. Ive always believed autos were slower. How wrong i am. Still will always drive a manual (hopefully type R next...VTEC yeah baby). Autos are too boring for me. When i get in my mums commy i always reach for the clutch pedal and realize its not there. Sketches me out always lol
MITCHAY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 02:14 AM   #17
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default

tell us how ya go with the race, actually i saw a bloke give a comy ute full bore on the westgate freeway ,accelerated ok but flat nacker his top speed looked pretty slow must be limited big time
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 11:35 AM   #18
neb
hibernating
 
neb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,135
Default

yeah the manuals are definately quicker. but then i think a well setup auto would probably be quicker than the manual (i.e. high stall and shift kit). and manuals only seem good for drag racing up to a certain point... around 12second quarter miles maybe.. then it seems to be better off to change to auto since they tend to be stronger, more reliable and more consistent, and dont stress the driveline as much.

but saying that i much prefer driving manual :P
neb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 11:54 AM   #19
The MaDDeSTMaN
No longer driving a Ford.
 
The MaDDeSTMaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 2,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neb
yeah the manuals are definately quicker. but then i think a well setup auto would probably be quicker than the manual (i.e. high stall and shift kit). and manuals only seem good for drag racing up to a certain point... around 12second quarter miles maybe.. then it seems to be better off to change to auto since they tend to be stronger, more reliable and more consistent, and dont stress the driveline as much.

but saying that i much prefer driving manual :P
Yep, as far as I am aware, it all comes down to gearing and engine power output. The reason a manual will be faster then an auto (I'm talking about factory spec boxes here) is that the gearing is usually better for acceleration in a manual box compared to an auto. The auto can shift quicker, but that isn't much help if the gear ratios are too tall, which is particularly evident in auto falcons where it won't shift up until 70-80km/h. Sure, you can increase the power output of the engine, and that will help, but all other things being equal (we'll forget about the strengths of an auto box to cope with increased power output for the sake of this discussion), a 5 speed manual will always have a distinct advantage over a 4 speed (or 3 speed) auto because of the gear ratios.

That is, until you start making a lot more power then factory, and start comparing replacement gearboxes, which admittedly will come into the picture sooner for manual drivers then their auto counterparts due to the relative weakness of the falcon manual gearboxes.

But hey, that is how I understand it, I could be wrong, wouldn't be the first time.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by russellw
For those who get their jollies attacking other people let me remind you that we will not tolerate this here. If you want to do that then I am sure your presence would be welcomed elsewhere.
The MaDDeSTMaN is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 12:16 PM   #20
MITCHAY
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,465
Default

Yeah i suppose if your gonna beef up a car your gonna upgrade the gearbox too. It just an auto takes out the fun in my case anyway. When you want to overtake someone for example you just drop the gear and rape someone. In an auto you put the foot down and hope for the best. In a manual the difference between winning and losing can come down to a wrong gearshift and thats where driver skill comes in. My understanding is that autos are far more expensive to replace aswell.
MITCHAY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 12:18 PM   #21
dansedgli
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
dansedgli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MITCHAY
When you want to overtake someone for example you just drop the gear and rape someone. In an auto you put the foot down and hope for the best.
Hmmm.
__________________
Turbo AU ute ~ Nice legs, shame about the face. 282rwkw at 15psi.
dansedgli is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 12:29 PM   #22
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MITCHAY
Yeah i suppose if your gonna beef up a car your gonna upgrade the gearbox too. It just an auto takes out the fun in my case anyway. When you want to overtake someone for example you just drop the gear and rape someone. In an auto you put the foot down and hope for the best. In a manual the difference between winning and losing can come down to a wrong gearshift and thats where driver skill comes in. My understanding is that autos are far more expensive to replace aswell.
When you're talking high power outputs, manuals are wildly expensive for less result then automatic transmissions. The best T56 I know of (and one of the best street-car manuals).. the G-Force T56.. rated to handle 900hp and 800ftlbs of torque.. costs $4,695.00 US outright.

One of my favourite automatics.. the Lentech Ford AOD-E 4spd, rated to handle 1500hp and 1100ftlbs of torque.. costs $2,795.00 US outright.

And generally, in a high-powered drag application, the auto does not self shift. If its a 4spd, for example, you get this shift pattern...
P
R
N
4
3
2
1

All you do is push the selector in the gear you want. Much faster shifting then any manual can (let go of accelerator, clutch in, move gear selector, clutch out, accelerate). You can also get 'reverse pattern' auto's in which the the shift pattern looks like...
P
R
N
1
2
3
4

So that you pull the gears when accelerating instead of pushing. If I'm not mistaken, a stock T56 6spd costs more then the stock BTR M97LE 4spd in BA Falcon's also.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 12:38 PM   #23
MITCHAY
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,465
Default

Hmmm. Is this because its got 6 gears instead of 4. Very interesting im learning a bit here.
MITCHAY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 03:01 PM   #24
mcflux
Banned
Donating Member1
 
mcflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MITCHAY
When you want to overtake someone for example you just drop the gear and rape someone. In an auto you put the foot down and hope for the best.
My BA tiptronic says otherwise :the_finge

Also keep in mind those people with shift kits. How much will a shift kit set you back? Mine = $11.50

-Dave-
mcflux is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 01:04 PM   #25
BlueRaven
Dual O2 sensors
 
BlueRaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisneyworld
Posts: 1,437
Default

I think it depends on the application. If you were circuit racing than a manual is the only way (apart from a modded auto I guess), but drags seems to see the auto win.
__________________
Black 1990 300zx Twin Turbo 5 Speed Manual :
Blue 2004 Mini Cooper S 6 Speed Manual - Yes, thank you Amanda. I realise now that you updated my signature to include your car. :
BlueRaven is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 01:34 PM   #26
neb
hibernating
 
neb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,135
Default

to be honest i think i actually change gears faster in a manual than what a factory falcon auto does.. they tend to be kind of slow/smooth changing stock. and with the manualised autos i still think you can change just as quick with a normal manual transmission.

(let go of accelerator, clutch in, move gear selector, clutch out, accelerate) ... its more like (start changing gear, clutch in while letting off acelerator a little, put into gear, clutch out, accelerate).. it all sort of happens at the same time basically, very quickly.
neb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 01:43 PM   #27
MITCHAY
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,465
Default

Yeah its weird with autos for me. When i drive my mums commy and put the foot down it wont change gear until you back off. But its smooth to say the least. Whenever i hear an auto being flogged it sounds so bad cause it sounds like its being strained hard.
MITCHAY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 02:44 PM   #28
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neb
to be honest i think i actually change gears faster in a manual than what a factory falcon auto does.. they tend to be kind of slow/smooth changing stock. and with the manualised autos i still think you can change just as quick with a normal manual transmission.

(let go of accelerator, clutch in, move gear selector, clutch out, accelerate) ... its more like (start changing gear, clutch in while letting off acelerator a little, put into gear, clutch out, accelerate).. it all sort of happens at the same time basically, very quickly.
You can't shift as fast as a manulised auto with a H-pattern manual. All the auto driver does is push (or pull, if its reverse pattern) the shifter into the next slot.

The only faster shifting transmissions are sequential manual's or "manu-matics" such as BMW's SMG or VW's DSG.. Ferrari's F1 gearbox, Lamborghini's E-Gear etc etc.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 02:58 PM   #29
turboute
turboute
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neb
to be honest i think i actually change gears faster in a manual than what a factory falcon auto does.. they tend to be kind of slow/smooth changing stock. and with the manualised autos i still think you can change just as quick with a normal manual transmission.
You are probably right as the shifting (esp in older falcons) isn't that quick, also the shift points may not be where you want. There are upgrades in the way of replacing shifting solenoids that can combat this.
turboute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2005, 03:24 PM   #30
klawsterfobik
Bad Music and Litre Bikes
 
klawsterfobik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Westmeadows
Posts: 2,446
Default

IMO, you cant compare a stock auto box ie, in your Mums Commie to that used in drag racing. As has been said, stock auto boxes are set up to deal with normal driving conditions, everyday, getting good fuel economy, and nice soft shifts so that you dont notice it.

A racing auto box is a hell of a lot different, fuel economy doesnt factor into it, the harder (read: shorter) the shift the better, it will be geared shorter to get you off the line nice and quick, and the shift points are going to be tuned to where you engine makes it power.

I can throw my auto Cortina back into 2nd when cruising around, and like you said it goes no where. But do it in a box thats designed to race, and all you'll be doing is holding on.
__________________
XY Wagon - NAKED!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gammaboy
Anyway. Enough reality, back to the topic.
klawsterfobik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL