Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29-09-2005, 08:09 AM   #1
OzJavelin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OzJavelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
Default Carrying an extra 500kg?

I'm working on a theoretical project - don't laugh .. SV1/SV2/AP6 Valiant with 3.5L alloy V8 - and was checking out weights of these vehicles (so I can determine if a 215ci V8 can suitably repower a car originally with a 225ci /6). The MAXIMUM weight I can find for one of these is 1218kg. My rough understanding of modern cars is that a Commodore is roughly 1600kg and a Falcon 1700kg ... so modern cars are carrying 400-500kg more weight than their "family sedan" equivalents of 40years ago and they were ALL steel. So despite all the plastic, aluminimum, CAD/CAM, etc we have to lug around the equivalent of 4-5 fat guys just to get down the shops!
Yes I understand all the benefits of modern cars, and yes this is an overly simplistic view, but what about building a smaller, lighter, 6/V8 powered vehicle? Fourty years ago an average family with three kids would fit in an AP6/EH/XP .. why is it now that anyone with (god forbid!) two kids needs a SUV the size of a Hummer!!

OzJavelin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-09-2005, 10:33 AM   #2
Fairlane
V8 Powaah
 
Fairlane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
Posts: 1,994
Default

Safety pretty much, reinforced crossmembers, crumple zones and all increased steel reinforcing not to mention stuff likely much larger brakes, tyres, more complicated suspensions, bigger and more complicated motors (no pushrods and EFI), airconditioning, more complicated exhauts power steering, god knows how much electical wiring, stereo's, carpeting/soundproofing not to mention stuff like thicker steel all add up to one heavy car.

I find it a bit dodgy too, but it seems to be the way it is 1.5ton+ cars are going to be the future.

As for the 3.5 V8 are you thinking of using the Rover V8, cause that would be certainly interesting. Though if you wanted to try something different you could use the Leyland 4.4V8 (dont know if it fits) or perhaps a more modern 6 cylinder
__________________
FG G6E Turbo- Seduce & Cashmere - Sold


XF S pack Sedan- AU 302 Windsor, T5, 2.77 LSD, Many Mods
Fairlane is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-09-2005, 06:27 PM   #3
OzJavelin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OzJavelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fairlane
As for the 3.5 V8 are you thinking of using the Rover V8, cause that would be certainly interesting. Though if you wanted to try something different you could use the Leyland 4.4V8 (dont know if it fits) or perhaps a more modern 6 cylinder
Yeah .. I'm going small-and-cheap (to buy and run) here. I'm falling over Rover 3.5L V8s .. Leyland 4.4L V8s are getting rare(ish). I also thought the comparison of 215ci to 225ci would help make rego people smile?
OzJavelin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-09-2005, 06:38 PM   #4
mcflux
Banned
Donating Member1
 
mcflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
Default

215ci V8 would mean less torque for the Val. Personally I'd stick with the six, unless you're after that wonderful exhaust note

lol you know you want the V8 and just want it as a cruiser ;)
mcflux is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-10-2005, 10:01 PM   #5
xyute
A.k.a wolf159
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 74
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fairlane
not to mention stuff like thicker steel heavy car.
Thicker steel? You must be joking? Those old Valiants are built like tanks it takes 2 ppl to carry the front wing off an AP5/6, and for all your crumple zones and reinforced doors etc an old Val is gonna sale straight through you EL. Now I know i'm gonna get roasted by ppl who are gonna quote MTA crash tests at me but crashing a car into a concrete black a 35kph dont meen squat in the real world. All the weight in modern cars aint really structural. Oh by the way the dry curb weight of an XB GT is approx 1600kg and thats all steel.

Sorry if I went a little off topic there, but stick with the 225 if you can they are a beast of a motor with more torque than you can shake a stick at, might be a bit thirsty though.
xyute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-10-2005, 07:41 AM   #6
noosacuda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
noosacuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 604
Default

The Rover 3.5 is a good motor,i was building a hot rod from a '49 Vauxhall Velox with LJ Torana front end and diff with a Rover V8,and from memory the motor was about the same weight as a Holden 6(?). But inthe Val it would be pretty gutless,as they (Rover V8's) could hardly pull the Rover they came from. BTY a Slant 6 weighs 525lbs, approx.239kg. Try the Toyota or Nissan alloy Hemi's??
noosacuda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-10-2005, 10:24 AM   #7
OzJavelin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OzJavelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noosacuda
But inthe Val it would be pretty gutless,as they (Rover V8's) could hardly pull the Rover they came from.
I remember reading an article in Australian Muscle Car about some fantastic Rover V8 sports sedan that Rover sent to Australia to compete with the locals .. (one of) it's problems was weight .. it weighed a LOT for it's size. I'd be suspicious that an AP6 would actually weigh less than a Rover3500?
OzJavelin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-10-2005, 10:40 AM   #8
OzJavelin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OzJavelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzJavelin
I remember reading an article in Australian Muscle Car about some fantastic Rover V8 sports sedan that Rover sent to Australia to compete with the locals .. (one of) it's problems was weight .. it weighed a LOT for it's size. I'd be suspicious that an AP6 would actually weigh less than a Rover3500?
Yep .. base Rover 3500 = 1274kg .. AP6 = 1218kg
OzJavelin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-09-2005, 05:51 PM   #9
deesun
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
deesun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,167
Default

PHEW, I thought you were taking the pi** out of me :jab:
__________________
igodabigblackshinycar and I relented and allowed a BMW into the garage.
deesun is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-09-2005, 06:45 PM   #10
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzJavelin
I'm working on a theoretical project - don't laugh .. SV1/SV2/AP6 Valiant with 3.5L alloy V8 - and was checking out weights of these vehicles (so I can determine if a 215ci V8 can suitably repower a car originally with a 225ci /6).

Why dont you try to get your hands on a 265 hemi, unless you just want a cruser. A few small mods (tripple webber carbie and exhaust) can give you about 200kW (cant remember if it was at the wheels or flywheel). Also it's one reliable engine. Also as it's a valiant motor you should have less hassles implementing it.
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-09-2005, 07:21 PM   #11
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

I say go for the Rover 215. Its something different... and its a very good engine. They get plenty of power out of them in the UK, and its got some interchangeable bits with the SBC (cyl heads for example... so you can put AFRs on it :evil3: )
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-09-2005, 07:57 PM   #12
brenx
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
brenx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pakenham, Victoria
Posts: 6,983
Default

they extra weights in safety as stated above. It's also in sound proofing and rust proofing ;)

If your keen on staying with a 6cyl. CHI makes these



Flow chart comparisons here -> http://www.chiheads.com/heads_04.html#
__________________
74 XB Fairmont (street car) 11.07@123.02mph. 08 LV Ford Focus XR5 (daily).

Tuned by Hallam Performance
brenx is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-09-2005, 08:04 PM   #13
Psycho Chicken
Banned
 
Psycho Chicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South East Melbourne
Posts: 6,156
Default

Yeah but fuel economy is better, can we really complain?
Psycho Chicken is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-09-2005, 07:26 AM   #14
OzJavelin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OzJavelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
Default

While I'm annoying people with an O/Tish subject .. does anyone know if a RoverV8 still uses the original Buick/Oldsmobile/Pontiac trans boltpattern of the "original" 215ci? ... O/D auto anyone? [ the 3.8LV6 holden is a derivative of this engine ]
OzJavelin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-09-2005, 07:47 AM   #15
ZC-Cruiser
The car's got pickup
 
ZC-Cruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,720
Default

Yep, new cars are heavy - our ZC with Alloy Head II, Air, Stereo, 850 litre boot etc is only 1450kg.....

Gets 11l/100km fully loaded with two adults and a baby and all their gear (boot full and passenger side of rear seat stacked with bags).

That will improve to sub 10l/100km with 205/65R15 tyres instead of the 215/65R14 tyres...
ZC-Cruiser is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL