Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Ford Australia Vehicles > Small and Mid Sized Cars > Escort, Cortina, Sierra and Capri

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24-06-2006, 12:02 AM   #1
mk2_1979_escort
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 72
Angry Quickly I Need Some Re-assurance

PLEASE I NEED TO KNOW!!!

Upon researching various cars I can accross some stats that astounded me. A 1996 Hyundai Excel 1.5L engine is producing 74kw standard, and like my mk2 2.0L Escort it also weighs around the 950kg mark. Furthur more I found that a standard 2.0L escort also produces 74kw, what am I to make of this information. Can a 1996 standard piece of korean crap beat my Esky ( in a straight line) or at least keep up ?? surely I am wrong.

Please put my worries to rest.

:sm_drool:

mk2_1979_escort is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2006, 10:25 AM   #2
T3man
Banned
 
T3man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: searching for cubes
Posts: 6,672
Default

Ha ha ha - nope, you're not wrong. I have one of those pieces of Korean crap (99 X3 Excel twin cam) and also a 99 Festiva (1.5L single cam motor). Both have no trouble keeping up with a standard 2.0L Escort. And get way way better fuel economy to boot - oh, the wonders of modern technology
T3man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-06-2006, 07:34 PM   #3
crispymk2
Regular Member
 
crispymk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perth, WA - NOR
Posts: 325
Default

Yeah but at least your not driving a girls car and if they have the same power all you need to do is be a better driver and you wont have a problem
__________________
GGR | SCT | Tein | Samco | Whiteline | Mongoose | Forge
crispymk2 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-06-2006, 09:37 PM   #4
T3man
Banned
 
T3man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: searching for cubes
Posts: 6,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crispymk2
Yeah but at least your not driving a girls car and if they have the same power all you need to do is be a better driver and you wont have a problem
True - a guy looks better in an Esky. However if the girl in the girlie's car is even half awake she'll make the guy in the Esky look stupid. And I don't mean just in straight lines. Sad to admit it but the fact is that my wife's Excel, with lowered Lovells and KYB gas shocks but stock standard wheels/rubber and engine, will out perform my RS2000. My daughter's Festiva, also with modified suspension, 15" mags and 50 series rubber, also stock standard engine, will do the same.

They perform well above their engine capacity would initially indicate. That's not to say I'd ever buy one myself. But I'd be very careful while driving my Esky to not pick on one as I know I could be made very red-faced.
T3man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 12:08 PM   #5
whooligan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
whooligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 556
Default

Generally those jap slappers are a little quicker off the mark but they just don't have the torque to keep up with a well set-up pinto on any kind of incline. What you have to remember is that the pinto was de-tuned to meet the pollution laws restricting upto 20% of the potential power. A decent exhaust system, accurate timing and a good carby will regain the original horses and free up some "access" to that torque.
Plus only a moron would buy a Hyundai, so they are not worth wasting your fuel on. :
whooligan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 01:03 PM   #6
T3man
Banned
 
T3man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: searching for cubes
Posts: 6,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whooligan
Generally those jap slappers are a little quicker off the mark but they just don't have the torque to keep up with a well set-up pinto on any kind of incline. What you have to remember is that the pinto was de-tuned to meet the pollution laws restricting upto 20% of the potential power. A decent exhaust system, accurate timing and a good carby will regain the original horses and free up some "access" to that torque.
Plus only a moron would buy a Hyundai, so they are not worth wasting your fuel on. :
So are you calling my wife and daughter "morons".

Just watch yourself mate or I'll borrow one of their cars and come down there and paint your Esky-driving face RED.
T3man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 06:08 PM   #7
JamesR
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Traralgon, Vic
Posts: 577
Default

i wanna know how many people walk past hyundai's and go, "WOW, check out that Hyundai"
probably not as many as me with my esky
i always get comments about the esky. i guess it cos they are a fairly rare car..
__________________
1977 MkII Escort Ghia.
2006 MY07 Subaru Liberty GT Spec B wagon.

my photo blog;
http://www.jamesruff.net
JamesR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-06-2006, 07:10 PM   #8
T3man
Banned
 
T3man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: searching for cubes
Posts: 6,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesR
i wanna know how many people walk past hyundai's and go, "WOW, check out that Hyundai"
probably not as many as me with my esky
i always get comments about the esky. i guess it cos they are a fairly rare car..
EXACTLY!

But not what the thread was about .... emotions are one thing - facts another.
T3man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-07-2006, 11:44 PM   #9
daveking
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: perth
Posts: 6
Default

my emotions run high. Im 16 and just bort my first car last week... a mk 2 1980 2 dr eski. Afta much arguing wit my folks i finally convinced them to let me get an eski, instead of one of those stupid ricers, and already i get comments about it.
daveking is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-07-2006, 08:53 AM   #10
whooligan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
whooligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 556
Default

Choosing a car SHOULD be about emotion and not purely so-called FACTS. The fact is, if you spend $10,000 on a Hyundai you have a cheap run-about that will get you from A to B in relative comfort. If you take that same $10,000 you can buy a very good, reliable and comfortable old Ford and have plenty of change left over to modify, improve and modernise that old Ford to such a level that no korean import can ever hope to achieve.
The mentality of most people on the road is that our cars are a waste of space and should be crushed and made into tin cans. But on a very real level, most people are ignorant to the fact that buying a modern car is in most cases a bigger waste. A waste of resourses, a waste of money and a waste time. Buying a korean import does nothing for the Australia economy, does nothing for the consumer (because its worth nothing as soon as you drive it of the lot) and what it saves you in fuel, costs you in up-keep. The parts are made so cheaply, they are designed to work for a few years and be thrown away. You are basically "leasing" a disposable car.
I've owned my Escort for 5 years and spent less than a grand on it in parts and replaced the entire running gear. I went out yesterday, dragged off a 5 year old Magna, almost dragged off a brand new V8 Ute, scared the crap out of my passenger, and had a 5 minute conversation with a guy at the petrol station about how you never see these "old things" on the road anymore. Tell me thats going to happen in a hyundai? I think not.
I short, by buying a hyundai, daiwoo, or whatever, you are basically saying to everyone that you are just like the rest of the boring, emotionless, mindless sheep on the road who think FACTS speak for themselves. :togo: Facts are whatever the spin-doctors want you to believe.
whooligan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-07-2006, 02:58 PM   #11
T3man
Banned
 
T3man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: searching for cubes
Posts: 6,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whooligan
Choosing a car SHOULD be about emotion and not purely so-called FACTS. The fact is, if you spend $10,000 on a Hyundai you have a cheap run-about that will get you from A to B in relative comfort. If you take that same $10,000 you can buy a very good, reliable and comfortable old Ford and have plenty of change left over to modify, improve and modernise that old Ford to such a level that no korean import can ever hope to achieve.
The mentality of most people on the road is that our cars are a waste of space and should be crushed and made into tin cans. But on a very real level, most people are ignorant to the fact that buying a modern car is in most cases a bigger waste. A waste of resourses, a waste of money and a waste time. Buying a korean import does nothing for the Australia economy, does nothing for the consumer (because its worth nothing as soon as you drive it of the lot) and what it saves you in fuel, costs you in up-keep. The parts are made so cheaply, they are designed to work for a few years and be thrown away. You are basically "leasing" a disposable car.
I've owned my Escort for 5 years and spent less than a grand on it in parts and replaced the entire running gear. I went out yesterday, dragged off a 5 year old Magna, almost dragged off a brand new V8 Ute, scared the crap out of my passenger, and had a 5 minute conversation with a guy at the petrol station about how you never see these "old things" on the road anymore. Tell me thats going to happen in a hyundai? I think not.
I short, by buying a hyundai, daiwoo, or whatever, you are basically saying to everyone that you are just like the rest of the boring, emotionless, mindless sheep on the road who think FACTS speak for themselves. :togo: Facts are whatever the spin-doctors want you to believe.
... but has absolutely zero to do with the topic of the thread.

Just to refresh everyone's memory it was to do with the FACT of whether a Hyundai actualy did have the same power as an Esky and the simple answer has been given. You can say anything you like to justify why you should buy an Esky on an emotive basis but you can't deny the simple FACTS.

And, as for spending money on mods to an Esky vs. a Korean import, I would suggest that the same dollars spent on either would reap the same outcome - the modern EFI motors, often with twin overhead cams and multi valves, will always outperform the old carby job.

Also your criticism of the longevity of the service parts for the Koreans is so ridiculous it is laughable. When did you ever get 60,000km from a spark plug on your Esky? I have to replace mine about every 20,000km. When did you ever get 100,000km from your rotor and dissy cap? I replace mine at about the same time I do my plugs. And on top of that I have to replace condensor and points as well. Can you get 100,000km from your ignition leads? My Escort only gets half that. How often do you have to adjust or service your carby? I do mine every couple of years. With EFI it is a non-event - the fuel pumps last longer than a mechanical one on the Esky, fuel filters about the same as the Esky, injectors last heaven knows how long??? Not much expense really with these modern engines. Oh, and the OHC timing belt has to be done every 30,000km on the Esky whereas it goes 100,000km on the Festiva - go figure!

My daughter's Festiva has just done the distances I quoted above on those service items. She sure has cheaper (and just as reliable motoring) as I do from my Esky. On top of that she never gets less than 35 mpg in the city and I can't dream of that in the Esky even on a long highway trip.

Fact is I hate Jap and Korean imports for all the reasons you mentioned - but also the real FACTS regarding performance/cost/reliability are exactly as I have stated. Sad but true
T3man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-07-2006, 09:26 AM   #12
whooligan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
whooligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 556
Default

Wowwww!! Reel him in boys, we've got a live one here!
The wonderful thing about discussion forums is how you can polarized people on an opinion alone. My interpretation of this thread was that MK2_1979_Escort's was thinking, why has he bought an Escort when a modern korean souless piece of krap will out perform a "standard" 2lt Escort?
My point is made in the first sentence....."choosing a car SHOULD be about emotion...." and that the "facts" are merely marketing guff. When was the last time you drove an Hyundai for 100,000ks without servicing....You haven't, because it would be well stuffed well before that. I bought an 8 year old Ford/Mazda Laser, one owner car with less than 90,000 on the clock. I drove the wheels off that thing for 4 years, and it fell apart by 140,000ks.....They are simply not built to last. I've done close to 60,000ks in my RS in 5 years, thrashed the living be-jezzus out of it and thing just takes it. The old pinto might leak like a seive but, keep up the oil and water to 'em and they are bullet-proof.
Really, who gives a rats wossit about fuel economy? I've only changed my timing belt twice in 5 years and its, like a 15 minute job, anyway!!!! Tried changing one on a Ford Escape????....All 30 years of technology means is 30 x the price and hassle......Thats why people STILL race pintos and crossflows, 30 years down on....Keep it simple stupid. :
As for the dollar for dollar argument???? You are $10 grand down before you start with the rice-cooker. I bought an Escort with a fully worked engine for $600 and there isn't a NA 4 cylinder for 5 miles that can touch it. Granted $3000 was spent on the motor NINE years ago, but what would $3000 get for your Hundy? A noisy exhaust and pssed off neighbours and $13,000 wasted. If I spent my remaining $6400, I'd be chasing down motorbikes.....Do us all a favour a pss off to duffduff.com :
whooligan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-07-2006, 01:17 PM   #13
T3man
Banned
 
T3man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: searching for cubes
Posts: 6,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whooligan
Wowwww!! Reel him in boys, we've got a live one here!
The wonderful thing about discussion forums is how you can polarized people on an opinion alone. My interpretation of this thread was that MK2_1979_Escort's was thinking, why has he bought an Escort when a modern korean souless piece of krap will out perform a "standard" 2lt Escort?
My point is made in the first sentence....."choosing a car SHOULD be about emotion...." and that the "facts" are merely marketing guff. When was the last time you drove an Hyundai for 100,000ks without servicing....You haven't, because it would be well stuffed well before that. I bought an 8 year old Ford/Mazda Laser, one owner car with less than 90,000 on the clock. I drove the wheels off that thing for 4 years, and it fell apart by 140,000ks.....They are simply not built to last. I've done close to 60,000ks in my RS in 5 years, thrashed the living be-jezzus out of it and thing just takes it. The old pinto might leak like a seive but, keep up the oil and water to 'em and they are bullet-proof.
Really, who gives a rats wossit about fuel economy? I've only changed my timing belt twice in 5 years and its, like a 15 minute job, anyway!!!! Tried changing one on a Ford Escape????....All 30 years of technology means is 30 x the price and hassle......Thats why people STILL race pintos and crossflows, 30 years down on....Keep it simple stupid. :
As for the dollar for dollar argument???? You are $10 grand down before you start with the rice-cooker. I bought an Escort with a fully worked engine for $600 and there isn't a NA 4 cylinder for 5 miles that can touch it. Granted $3000 was spent on the motor NINE years ago, but what would $3000 get for your Hundy? A noisy exhaust and pssed off neighbours and $13,000 wasted. If I spent my remaining $6400, I'd be chasing down motorbikes.....Do us all a favour a pss off to duffduff.com :
Aren't you a fuucking charmer! If you can't keep to the topic of the thread why don't YOU do the p!ss!ing off you fuuckwit. When you can't talk facts you talk utter crap. Quite clearly you can't come to terms with the obvious fact that the so-called Korean soul-less piece of crap will burn your Escort. Get yourself a life mate - you aren't for real in this world.
T3man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-07-2006, 02:52 PM   #14
Interceptor
HSV - I just ate one!
 
Interceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of nowhere
Posts: 3,214
Default

ok, sp the hyundai's, etc go hard and can outrun a esky..... but will they still be on the road in another 20 years?
Interceptor is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-07-2006, 01:22 AM   #15
mistermeena
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 29
Default

have to agree with whooligan - an excel cost a crap load more than your average esky and if your worried about performace from your escort..stoke it up a bit an u'll be faster than any hundy (cant say i've seen much in the way of performace parts for excel's besides massive kits and wings)
MKII79 stick with the esky u'll pull way more chicks!
mistermeena is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-07-2006, 01:32 AM   #16
mk2_1979_escort
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 72
Talking

Thank you everyone who added to this thread, it has been very informative, and enjoyable to read and follow. Despite the fact that I wouldnt be seen dead driving a hyundai, let alone my wife and/or duaghters car this thread has made me appreciate my car much more. Some very valid points were made, but Escorts are undeniabley the way to go. Also (i thought i might add) its a good thing my esky isnt standard.

Cheers :
mk2_1979_escort is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-07-2006, 09:06 AM   #17
whooligan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
whooligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mistermeena
have to agree with whooligan - an excel cost a crap load more than your average esky and if your worried about performace from your escort..stoke it up a bit an u'll be faster than any hundy (cant say i've seen much in the way of performace parts for excel's besides massive kits and wings)
MKII79 stick with the esky u'll pull way more chicks!
Lets face facts.....Its just about pulling more chicks. : :
whooligan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-07-2006, 05:51 PM   #18
crispymk2
Regular Member
 
crispymk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perth, WA - NOR
Posts: 325
Default

I shocked the hell out of some blond tart in a silver MX5 the other day, she wasnt too impressed about being beaten by a 36 year old car (tho i didn't tell her I just spent $4k on the engine)... just thought i'd throw that in there...

Oh, I also got canned by a super charged Hundie excel... but dont tell anyone ;)
__________________
GGR | SCT | Tein | Samco | Whiteline | Mongoose | Forge
crispymk2 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-07-2006, 10:20 PM   #19
mk2_1979_escort
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 72
Default

It wasn't T3man driving with his missus was it ?
mk2_1979_escort is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-07-2006, 11:01 PM   #20
$90esky
Hiding in wheel smoke
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bunbury, WA
Posts: 24
Default

I happen to own both a 96 excel 1.5 and a 2.0l mkII.
1. My escort has only 66000 on the clock and only jst keeps with the excel.
2. Off the net I can put together a full turbo kit for 2000 and my excel cost 3000
3. My excel has done 135000 and the other day the clutch and gear box died along with destroying the cv shafts.

So yes teh excel has power enough to keep with the escort but is is no way designed to be driven using this power, the escort on the other hand can handle it. Who cares about plugs and what not at least your not replacing major engine or driveline components regularly. Besides escorts are a hundred times cooler and most importantly are RWD, I don't even bother with FWD cars anymore.
$90esky is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-01-2007, 09:50 PM   #21
79esky!
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SA
Posts: 34
Default

well i canned an exel the otherday had a cannon hangin out of the *** sounded a bit lumpy too. mind u my 79 2l is fully rebuilt bottom to top camtech cam and some nice 45mm sideies aswell as a bored and decked block and faced ported and polised head. im pretty happy with my accomplishment :thebirds:
__________________
KISSMYESKY!
79esky! is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-01-2007, 08:09 AM   #22
whooligan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
whooligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 556
Default

I think we have established that those jappers are a waste of space on our roads....But I don't mind going a few rounds with any secret rice-cooker fans out there. out:
whooligan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-01-2007, 07:56 PM   #23
fordfella80
fordfella80
 
fordfella80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: new zealand
Posts: 17
Default

Hey..heated topic.
They made modern escorts too.Good ones that won world rallies etc.Cosworth and all that jazz were pretty snazzy.Modern asian cars will often be more reliable and require less service than a 25+year old escort but thats because thy're modern.My japper never skips a beat and goes like the clappers for what it is but I feel like I kill off a little part myself every time I drive it.Life is too darn short to roll around in dud wheels.Asians try but they just cant put a soul into thier tinny characterless cars.
fordfella80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-01-2007, 10:27 AM   #24
eb_5litre
It'll Buff Out.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 1,298
Default

It should be as simple as -

RWD for men
FWD for women

Comparing an Excel to an Escort? Pfft please, thats a no-brainer.


(Please completely ignore the fact I drove a TX5 Turbo..... I still cant stand FWD) e
eb_5litre is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-01-2007, 11:01 AM   #25
caprispecial
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 142
Default

What about FORD FWD then? Are they any good? Check out Focus/ Mondeo section under thread "A falcon drivers fortnight in a focus."
caprispecial is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-01-2007, 11:36 AM   #26
eb_5litre
It'll Buff Out.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 1,298
Default

I dunno call me old-fashioned and simple but I reckon RWD is way more fun to drive, my FWD TX5 is downright dangerous to drive in the wet.... I dont mind losing traction but not steering as well.
eb_5litre is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-01-2007, 02:32 PM   #27
melbzetec
Old enough to know better
 
melbzetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,311
Default

Isn't that called "driver error"???LOL
__________________
Manual 2003 Machine Silver 5 Door LR Focus Zetec.
Mods: Ford Racing CNC'd cylinder head milled .040", 3 angle valve grind. Ford Racing Stage II camshafts. Ford Racing cam gears. Ford Racing long tube header. Random Technology hi flow cat. Herrod 2.25" stainless cat-back. Pipercross Viper intake. CFM 65mm throttle body. 2000 ported intake manifold. Herrod Custom SCT tune. Eibach suspension. Quaife ATB diff. Wilwood 13" brakes. Custom ST170 leather interior.
www.cardomain.com/ride/2773918

melbzetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-01-2007, 02:55 PM   #28
eb_5litre
It'll Buff Out.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 1,298
Default

Not when the traction loss is deliberate......
eb_5litre is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2007, 10:10 AM   #29
whooligan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
whooligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 556
Default

It just the Old Skool v Modern argument all over again...... :
When it comes down to it, its each to it own. But the modern brigade need to realise that without the likes of Mk1 & Mk2 Escorts, x-flows, pintos and BDAs, going sideways in forest and around a racetrack, there wouldn't have been all the modern developments in cars that people take for granted, today.
Modern technology has taken a little of the control and a lot of the soul out of what made us want to drive these cars in the first place.

Sorry guys, this will be my last post on this forum. I think over the last year or so it has pretty much lost the plot for me with my "old technology." When you have to wait 3 minutes for the sponsorship to pop up before you can make a comment, I feel its time to take my comments elsewhere.
Stay tuned, whooligan.
whooligan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2007, 10:01 PM   #30
JamesR
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Traralgon, Vic
Posts: 577
Default

Glenn, faster internet in the solution.
get with the times. haha
__________________
1977 MkII Escort Ghia.
2006 MY07 Subaru Liberty GT Spec B wagon.

my photo blog;
http://www.jamesruff.net
JamesR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL