Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-10-2009, 08:34 AM   #11
CAT600
I miss my wheelbarrow
Donating Member3
 
CAT600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bluestreak Performance
Posts: 11,503
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out fellow AFF members... Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Daniels knowledge of modular engines and superchargers is extremely valuable to the AFF community. I have learnt quite a bit just reading his build threads. His contributions are often utilised by other members. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtfpv
i havent read this thread other than the 1st post . but simple mass tells us that 6 tanks instead of for , means 50% less economy . so to get the same economy from .
E-85 it would have to be 1/2 price at the bowser to match .
will this ever happen ???
Your shitten me right?

Instead of saying that 6 vs 4 is 50% less (actually sort of correct not allowing for the fact that its really 7 vs 5 as the cars are full at the start) look at it in terms of % increase........... like 7 tanks of E85 instead of 5 tanks of Ultimate 98 means the consumption is around 40% more AND THEN you dont make an **** by going on to say that the fuel would have to be 1/2 price (thats like saying the consumption is 100% more!)

Facts are that based on Stoichiometric fuel ratio, E85 (with its 9.7:1 stoich point vs gasoline 14.7:1) should be theoretically around 40-50% heavier on the km/litre burn rate than Unleaded, but with the engine tuned for lean running that can be brought down to around 30%, and with optimised compression ratios (15:1 on a NA car) making better use of the higher octane levels and reduced Nox levels, the greater thermal efficiency can get the economy within 12-15% of gasoline products.

Daniel
CAT600 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
 


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 02:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL