Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-07-2011, 12:41 AM   #1
stang65
FPRJET
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,143
Default GM Sued for Not Recalling Nonpolice Chevrolet Impalas to Fix Spindle Rods

http://editorial.autos.msn.com/blogs...b-554cf9add84c


General Motors has been sued by the owner of a Chevrolet Impala who claims the company recalled police versions of the sedan to fix a tire-wear issue but did not recall civilian Impalas for the same problem.

According to the suit, filed in Detroit, GM issued a recall for police Impalas in 2008 for faulty spindle rods, which misaligned the rear wheels and led to premature tire wear. GM told dealers to replace the spindle rods, realign the rear wheels and replace the tires.

The company also told dealers to reimburse police departments that paid for repairs, but it didn't recall more than 400,000 civilian vehicles, the lawsuit claims.

The plaintiff, Donna Trusky, bought an Impala in February 2008 and had to replace her tires after only 6,000 miles, the lawsuit says. The dealership where she bought the vehicle covered the cost and performed a front-end alignment but didn't inform Trusky of the rear-spindle-rod issue. After 18,000 more miles the rear tires needed to be replaced again, according to the suit.

The lawsuit, which seeks class-action status, included 16 online complaints from Impala owners who have experienced the same problem.

"We routinely do not comment on matters in litigation," GM spokesman Alan Adler said. "We did issue a technical service bulletin for 2007-08 Impala police cars that contained repair procedures for a rear suspension issue that led to premature rear tire wear."

__________________
Proud to own a FORD and sick of the constant bagging. You don`t like it, go buy a Holden, you`ll be back soon.
stang65 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
 


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL