Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-03-2012, 11:40 AM   #11
dddd
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 109
Default Re: australian oil refineries to close

Quote:
Originally Posted by z80
okay.....



It's called climate change abatement.
Sounds like a sound strategy to me, I am a climate change believer.

Let me ask you this...we export what type of coal?

And what type of coal do we burn in our power stations?

Which colour coal has a far greater CO2 emmission per megawatt produced?




I am certain that the exchange rate is a much more significant factor with the relative and highly visible desparity between accessible asian labour markets making it extremely attractive to not employ australians where possible.




Apart from liberating rhetoric,can you prove it?

I can't find any evidence to support your assertion....except Tony Abbott says so....
With the renewable energy policy, there has already been numerous reports submitted to the government suggesting to shut it down. Renewable energy (wind, solar etc) is just not commercial viable at present, as previously stated about 10 times more costly to produce per kw hr, there is just no getting around this fact.
This is the main reason our power bills have gone through the roof in the last 2-3 years. Does anyone believe that industry is immune from these same price rises. I'm all for the idea of it ,BUT it must be commercially viable and perhaps in another 20 to 30 years it maybe but not at present

I have no doubt the high exchange rate is doing its share of damage to the Australian industry at present, but it is an entirely separate issue to the 3 points I pointed out

The work place agreements brought in by Rudd/gillard have no doubt given us better wages and conditions, however are any of us really stupid enough to believe that we can have all these extra benefits and there will be no trade off, and it wont make us any less competitive with other countries, especially considering we already had arguably the best wages and conditions in comparison to our competing countries
No mater how much we hold our breath and stamp our feet, we can't change the fact Australia is part of a global market and as such we have to remain competitive with other countries to some extent. Companies will easily move to other more accommodating counties if manufacturing gets to expensive or difficult and why shouldn't they
This doesn't mean we have to work for a bowl of rice, we haven't in the past and industry has not only survived but grown, however in past years we have been able to utilise our one natural advantage cheap coal fired power stations that has now been completely taken away to the point where our power will be amongst the most expensive

As to the carbon tax, do you honestly believe that imposing another tax on our industry is going to help them compete with other countries industry ??
A tax that 95% of our competing countries have not got and have no intention of introducing on its industry/people. Let alone the introduction price point of approximately 3 times higher than the miniscule amount of countries that do have it.

Call me cynical but somehow I believe if the federal government had not gone through the 46 billion surplus (and god only knows how much from the future fund) that Howard left and then plunged us into another 225 billion debt on top of that (all in just 3 years) this carbon tax would not have been as important to them

As to climate change, its been changing all by itself for million's of years without man's doing. Hell carbon dioxide isn't even a pollutant, I think the figure is around 90% of it is produced naturally from the oceans, I haven't noticed gillard referring to the oceans as dirty polluting manufactures but then she cant tax the oceans yet can she
dddd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
 


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL