|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-03-2012, 08:07 PM | #1 | ||
Oo\===/oO
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
|
Misleading title, but everything about the falcon has over the past year.
So, this is my all-conquering theory on the falcon, mustang and Taurus post 2016 Ok... *sips water The Falcon and "one ford", what does it mean? One Ford To start, "One ford" is an umbrella plan in that the various ford outpost work together in a bit to cut costs and deliver quality products that the customer wants. A lot the focus has been on One Ford being a platform sharing system, true, but its deeper. The plan allows any component to be common across the world; this can mean anything from Engines and transmissions, to window switches and interior materials. The current theory is that the Falcon is not seen as part of One Ford, (understandable, as little has been said) but i come to the conclusion that it may be more then we think. The common thought is that the Falcon simply becomes any CKD Australian assembled Taurus due to the fact that the Falcon is a unique product, and not worth development money on Under One Ford, one of the key factors is to give the customer what it wants, given that the Taurus has not had a good name for its self here, and the fact that it is a large car anyway highlights to factors. One. A Falcon branded Taurus might be to transparent, and even calling it a Taurus here has some bad memories. Two. Its still a large car, what’s it got to offer over the Falcon? Can a US market product do well here? No doubt the Falcon and Taurus are going to share some components, but it may not be just a re-badged or face lift job. Sharing of platforms So, we have a Taurus, Mustang and falcon all due for replacement soon...what to do. These 3 models are all unique, only sold in there respective countries. Under one ford, the aim is to eliminate unique components, yet maintain a car suitable for a market. A car is 4 major things, body, drive train, interior and safety and electrical systems. One Ford will mean that, most likely, these will all be shared across all there models. With modern CAD and superpower computers, the ability is there to develop modular platforms that can cater for many applications. Most of the suspension and drive line components can be shared, and the actually sheet metal body/chassis components designed around them. Then interior switchgear, electronics seats etc can all be designed with all 3 in mind. Things like dashboard and trim styles will be unique, but things like , say a door handle, will be common across the 3. Same with the body, major shell structure common around the 3, but tweaks made to cater for the different focus of the vehicle. While this all seems a bit basic, I see it as the answer to the Falcon post 2016
__________________
|
||