Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 19-10-2012, 11:05 AM   #24
Jim Goose
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
Default Re: Anti Hoon Laws Unconstitutional

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loud_Noises
Post of the thread. The constitution of Australia is exceptionally vague and doesn't place concrete, unambiguous restrictions on the powers of the states and the federal governments. Unlike the US, their constitution has distinct separation of powers and places limits on what the government can't do.

What passes as a justice/legal system in Australia is a joke and needs to be overhauled from top to bottom.

It kinda does... it gives powers to the state by form of recognission of its laws.

Quote:
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 118
Recognition of laws etc. of States

Full faith and credit shall be given, throughout the Commonwealth to the laws, the public Acts and records, and the judicial proceedings of every State.
However it also says this:

Quote:
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 109
Inconsistency of laws

When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
In regards to power to seize items which are used in criminal offences... thats a hard one as I still cant find the relevent Federal law. (if there is one).
If there is no relevent federal law, then the states can do (as i see it) as they please basically.

The only part of the article posted by the OP which makes sense as to why the ruling was over turned is this part:

Quote:
Chief Justice Chris Kourakis ruled in Mr Bell's favour, saying the so-called anti-hoon legislation took away the discretion of the courts and applied a double punishment to offenders.
Which is all fine and good.... but this then also sets a precedence to other criminal cases where the crown tries to take away property used in SERIOUS CRIMINAL activity such as drug running etc...??

If a person is a habitual offender, then what is the solution?
(an example was shown on that new aussie police show where a L plate motorbike rider was caught doing 178kmh in a 100zone riding a bike too big for his licence category.... 6 weeks later 110kmh in an 80zone... both times his bike was taken away. clearly he didnt learn his lesson, and clearly having the bike taken away didnt work!)

There will always be bogans with low IQ who will continue to offend no matter what the punishment dished out.

Frankly ban them for life from ever owning a vehicle and having a licence if they are too stupid to learn.
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions??

Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole....
Jim Goose is offline  
 


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL