|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| Race Brakes Sydney Street and race performance pad / rotor combinations as well as brake upgrades and Exedy clutch kits. Website Link |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
20-02-2014, 04:10 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Perth
Posts: 391
|
Hi Matt,
Hope you don't mind another technical question which may be of interest to other readers also. I've been reading around on the net and come across a few posts that describe checking the axial runout on both hubs and then discs with a dial indicator gauge when fitting new discs, and then trying the disc in different positions to get the least combined runout, if any is present. Theory seems to be that if the combined runout is reduced as close as possible to zero then there is less change of disc thickness variation developing as the rotor wears. Given I can buy a cheap dial indicator gauge for about $45 on ebay this seems like it might almost pay for itself on the first set of rotors fitted. Do you think this is worth considering or are new rotors and hubs so accurate now that there is unlikely to be any benefit. Thanks for your thoughts, Matt |
||
|
|
| This user likes this post: |
Fitting new disks wiht dial indicator gauge?
Threaded Mode