|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
14-08-2014, 04:37 PM | #11 | |||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,585
|
Quote:
Yet again another example of how out of touch they really are, pity, because it's a great looking car. Normal people don't care about how much of a change there is or isn't. The sheet metal changes alone are enough for a new model number. FGX obviously just sounds like another FG and it completely discredits the cosmetic effort that has gone into the car. Would love to know how the boffins actually finalised that name, honestly they could have chosen ANYTHING other than that and it would have been ok. There is no more effort in making it FG X than FF, FZetc...actually it's a PIA. But again...Fords got it covered and I am sure they spent good money to work this out...they are all over it. Disappointing is one word, the car deserves more....surprised the marketing guru's didn't come up with iFG...that's what the kids are into these days
__________________
Last edited by Polyal; 14-08-2014 at 04:48 PM. |
|||