|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-08-2015, 12:14 AM
|
#1 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,138
|
What I'd really like to see is a very thorough comparison, either by an American publication (MT, Jalopnik, R&T) or one of ours- between the 3.5 Ecoboost and Duratecs versus our straight sixes, sometime before the latter dies.
It's a very long shot but if the straight six had better fundamental qualities (noise, idle, moving parts); and the data showed it would could be less costly to make it a class leader then perhaps Dearborn could take the dies somewhere and continue its development instead of the larger V6. It just seems ironic that the engine with the superior layout dies , while Jaguar and Merc see the error of their ways and are switching back. Just a thought, maybe we could start a petition for the comparo- it would get noticed and, while a long shot, stranger things have happened. |
||
|
Mercedes, Jaguar switching to L6, Ford doing opposite
Threaded Mode