|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| Site Support If something isn't working or you have a suggestion ( a nice one !! ) let us know here. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
20-03-2006, 02:07 AM
|
#1 | |||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,381
|
This is regarding this announcement: http://www.fordforums.com.au/announc...ouncementid=14
Could someone please make the distinction between a legitimate questions and puerile speculation/questioning integrity. Not wanting to restart the futile argument again, but I would have though with the supporting evidence in the threads that brought this on, and response from the sponsor, that it is not unreasonable to question the results that were posted. I know this puts the admin team in a difficult place (between sponsors and members), but it seems that many were very quick to attack anyone who questioned a sponsor, even though there was a legitimate reason to question what was being posted. I’m not sure if this is the right place for the issue to be brought up, but considering the number of people involved (many who I suspect are as frustrated as I am), an open discussion seems the best way to clear things up. Mark.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
Need help making the distinction
Threaded Mode