aufalcon.com car opinion needed.

[Dark Horse]

Originally Posted by AUGZMK

But Darky, if I was to send in four photos of the car below, and I was the owner, would it be acceptable to be in the members gallery? It's an AU after all.



This is where I think we need to have a condition that the car is at least drivable, and in a neat presentable condition. Not much to ask for really, I'm sure 100% of the AU's on the site comply with the third requirement anyway. It's just to prevent things getting out of hand, but then, I doubt Casper would put that car I've posted above on aufalcon.com, or even bother to ask us if it qualifies I don't think? It's an automatic no as far as I'm concerned. Darky, you see what I'm trying to say?

Just an observation here, we currently have photos of an accident damaged ute in the general gallery section three, which have been there for a fair while. I don't find that acceptable, and here we are discussing the relative merits from an objective point of view - being that of a reasonable standard of a car that is in a neat presentable condition to be added to the members section.

I know what you're getting at, and I totally agree, but why base the discussion over a particular members' car?

Yes, all AU owner's cars to date are neat and presentable and that is an automatic given when it comes to enthusiasts. Basically what I'm trying to argue is the common sense factor here, I don't want to see aufalcon regulated that far that we even come with a constitution.