|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-12-2021, 10:09 PM | #11 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 3,618
|
If charges were dropped it means that they did not have sufficient evidence to proceed, the eyewitness may of been too far away for instance, she dident assault the boy, he requested it, but the boys family must of been complicit as he is under the age of 16 yrs.
And if she did it multiple times before being stopped, then the folk who had the fake injection would only commit themselves to a perjury charge, but I have a feeling there may be another charge in relation to it, the alleged offence, who knows what goes on behind closed doors in the "corridors of power" PS...the fact no reason was given leaves it wide open to public conjecture, that's what bites more than anything! Last edited by slowsnake; 07-12-2021 at 10:13 PM. Reason: Add PS |
||