Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-06-2006, 08:50 AM   #11
buddyforu
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blutura
it doesn't prove that the VT design was aesthetically superior at all. It proves that it was more popular, thats all. You cannot say that one car has superior looks to another, it depends on the viewer.
If the VT didn't look any better than the AU, why was it more popular then??

If you have two cars in the same catagory where one looks awkward (I have NEVER once heard the AU called 'a nice looking car' even by other die hard Ford fans), and the other an obviously more cohesive design, which do you think will be more popular?

I know a lot of people out there that would choose a late EL over an series 1 AU any day. Why? Because it looks better.
buddyforu is offline  
 


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL