|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
14-11-2006, 03:16 AM | #31 | ||
Spr Jenkins
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
|
Ok, its the responsibility of the stronger party, in this case telstra, to inform the weaker party of any onerous terms in the contract, the terms being the excessively high fee for WAP usage.
If you can prove this, and make a reasonable case that the details of WAP usage was an onerous term of the contract then you may have a case and the contract will not be binding. It used to be that the signature on a contract was the only factor and buyer beware but this was overturned in Lestrange vs Graucob for anyone seriously interested. The law now focuses on consumer protection. If you can show that you had no way of knowing about the WAP usage fees then you will probably win. Go speak to a lawyer that focuses on contract law, they will be able to tell you in ten minutes whether you can fight it in court. |
||
14-11-2006, 03:52 AM | #32 | ||
Spr Jenkins
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
|
What the courts use to determine what is an onerous term is what a reasonable person would think if in that situation.
In this case you could argue that because you weren't charged for the first months usage of the WAP, and you had no way of knowing that you would be charged otherwise, that it would be reasonable in that situation to assume that it was free. Therefore it was onerous for Telstra to charge you for WAP, without first notifying you that it would do so. Telco's aren't stupid, they do things like this because more people just pay up then fight it. A good lawyer should just be able to make a quick phone call to Telstra and make it go away if you have a case. |
||
14-11-2006, 07:30 AM | #33 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Barossa Valley, South Australia
Posts: 3,381
|
Quote:
Would probably be the best place to start. That way he can relate his story and find out what his best plan of action is.
__________________
Cheers, Sam. |
|||
14-11-2006, 08:06 AM | #34 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,861
|
Quote:
|
|||
14-11-2006, 08:47 AM | #35 | |||
Falcon Addict
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Searching for ANOTHER Ice Pack....
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
Hell Yeah...$11k Must have been walking around with a woody for a week !! : : :
__________________
:eclipsee_ :eclipsee_ sleep: sleep: :eclipsee_ :eclipsee_ :eclipsee_ :eclipsee_ :eclipsee_ DAILY-2006 BF Falcon XR6 Turbo Sedan. 6 Speed Auto. 1/4 Mile......13.84sec/103.38Mph BF XR6T with an official 211.0 rwkw :
|
|||
14-11-2006, 09:12 AM | #36 | |||
PM me if you want
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pk Ranger Modding - QLD 👍
Posts: 7,498
|
The phone call and setup would have been recorded so to prove he understood exactley what he was getting, I doubt he has much recourse to get out of paying the bill, he cant enter an arrangement to pay it off, but at the end of the day the Telco would have had to buy the service he used so it has cost them money, even at half that they would still be out of pocket if they wiped the debt.
I highly doubt they are going to say oh sorry about that you didnt reliase here let me wipe that for you. Some arguement could be made that a new customer should have been notified earlier as to the usage on the phone and possible ability to pay the impending bill, but I don't see this as much of an arguement at the end of the day. Quote:
__________________
Owner of first ever car to retrofit BA SSS - the EA2BA Send me a PM if you want to know anything 2010 Ford Ranger PK High Rider (Auto) - 2011 Ford Fiesta (Auto)
|
|||
14-11-2006, 09:33 AM | #37 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,974
|
I hate how people take these things to A Current Affair - and then they play the evil music whilst talking about the "big bad corporations" and hash quotes together. Then all the bogans and geriatrichs at home jump up and down and yell "bloody rip off, corporate greed!" ect.
Funny that the only person to blame is your friend who didn't read the contract, and ASSUMED that he could just download endless gigabytes for nothing. I mean c'mon when does common sense prevail, and we say hey it was this guys fault not Telstra. Telstra is a business whos goal is to make a profit - they have very limited responsibilities in telling dumb people how to manage their money. Having said that I think you perosnally have a very good attitude to the situation and just want to help out a mate so no offense meant. All he can do is speak directly to a manager and try and negotiate a solution, if that fails seek legal advice though I doubt there is any avenue to pursue there.
__________________
1966 Ford Mustang coupe. 347 stroker, PA reverse manual C4, TCE high stall converter, B&M Pro Ratchet, Edelbrock alum heads, Edelbrock intake manifold, MSD ignition, Holley Street HP 750 CFM carb, gilmer drive, wrapped Hooker Super Comp Headers, dual 3" straight through exhaust, Bilstein shocks, custom springs, full poly suspension, American Racing rims, Open Tracker roller spring saddles and shelby drop. Still to go - Holley Sniper EFI with integrated fuel cell. |
||
14-11-2006, 10:19 AM | #38 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,165
|
Quote:
|
|||
14-11-2006, 02:34 PM | #39 | |||
Spr Jenkins
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
|
Quote:
It is the responsibility of Telstra to prove that he fully understood, not the other way around. From what was said in the first post, the guy on the phone was vague and misleading. Seriously, I didn't go to uni and study contract law for nothing guys, read the posts, if what he stated in the first post was true, on the face of it it sounds like he has a good case. |
|||
14-11-2006, 02:47 PM | #40 | ||
i'm baaaack....
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: workin on something
Posts: 4,460
|
get him to go to slater and gorden, they know what they are doing, and theres that no win no fee policy, i rekon they will find a loop hole, especially if theres advertising/money in it for them....
i really feel dorry for your mate, but how the hell could you sign up to a deal over the phone? has he received a written contract or disclosement statement of any kind? |
||
14-11-2006, 02:55 PM | #41 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: KNOX
Posts: 1,269
|
Basically hes screwed. Simple rule is nothing is ever free in this world, especially not phone contracts which are offered to you by FOB's.
|
||