Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29-11-2008, 05:17 PM   #61
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

How about an electric F150 that gets 100mpg, with 450kw, 2800Nm @1 rpm (not 1000 rpm)
http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2008/10...d-hi-pa-d.html
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-11-2008, 06:03 PM   #62
HLC
Audi S3
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney.
Posts: 8,307
Default

i wrote a paper about this for uni last year. i did a major in sustainable design in my industrial design degree.


basically, it was something like 160 000 kays needed to be travelled before any savings were made on the purchase of a prius over a small 4cylinder petrol car. because of the price offset and economy etc. even higher like 200 000 kays in some countries like the states.

not to mention the 'dead zone' around the factory where the prius batteries are made. the chemicals killed all life in a radius around the factory and now NASA tests their lunar robots and other stuff there because its a similar environment to space.

another point, flying all the batteries and other crap around the world back and forth isnt particularly economical.

it worked out cheaper, envirionmentally, to put a Hummer on the road than a toyota prius.

if i can find where i saved the paper, ill post it up if anyone is interested. i think i lost it in the void between new and old computer but :(
__________________
HLC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-11-2008, 07:55 PM   #63
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

Hi mate, I for one would be very appreciative if you could post up that paper.

Hope you can find it!

thanks in advance

tex
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-11-2008, 09:29 PM   #64
naddis01
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
 
naddis01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,738
Default

I personally think that LPG is the most underrated fuel in this country. Hopefully Ford will pull its finger out and introduce a Liquid injection Egas model for FG mkII. This is technology that is here and now. Liquid injection produces MORE power than petrol with an increase in consumption no more than 15%. Manufacturers claim only a 5% increase. BA/BF XR6 turbos have gained more than 10% to 15% extra power with these systems.

Now dont laugh but how about a liquid injection Egas on something like a Focus. If it was engineered during initial design so the gas tank didnt impeed rear boot storage as much as possible I feel this would be a much better alternative to a diesel focus. Plus you get the benefit of the LPG rebate offered by the government. If it acheived the same results as the Falcon it would have in the region of 123kw opposed to 107kw and use around 8.2L/100km of gas which is line ball with a Mazda 3 on petrol. The emissions from a LPG Focus would be around 123g/km while the petrol one emits 163g/km. Thats roughly a 25% decrease in emissions without the production and disposal environmetal impacts of a hybrid.
naddis01 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-11-2008, 09:50 PM   #65
Outbackjack
Central to all beach's
 
Outbackjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,653
Default

For a light hearted look at the Prius....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uwOL4rB-go
__________________
Real Aussie muscle cars have a clutch!!
http://www.roadsense.com.au/about.html
Outbackjack is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2008, 10:29 AM   #66
new2ford
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
new2ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven
Posts: 3,161
Default

Too much emphasis on just fuel costs in these discussions. For the average motorist's hip pocket the total operating cost is the issue. Check the NRMA's operating cost figures:

http://www.mynrma.com.au/cps/rde/xch...ting_costs.htm

My RWD TX Ford Territory (medium SUV) has lower operating costs than a Toyota Prius I-Tech (light car)!

If we are looking at a sustainable non-imported fuel in Australia that will provide long distance travel (unlike electric cars) we have natural gas. It seems to me Ford should be going beyond just LPG and looking more at CNG (which they did briefly back in the 1990s). Unfortunately the other factor is refuelling infrastructure and as long as this is dominated by the oil companies wanting to sell oil-based fuel this makes it hard. This is where the federal government could play a role.

We do need fuel self-sustainability which means getting off imported petroleum products onto sustainable locally-produced energy sources. Basically these are electricity and natural gas. Battery cars can't last the distance, which leaves CNG (or CNG-electric hybrid).
new2ford is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2008, 12:05 PM   #67
ebxr8240
Performance moderator
 
ebxr8240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St Clair..N.S.W
Posts: 14,875
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical advice. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by new2ford

If we are looking at a sustainable non-imported fuel in Australia that will provide long distance travel (unlike electric cars) we have natural gas. It seems to me Ford should be going beyond just LPG and looking more at CNG (which they did briefly back in the 1990s). Unfortunately the other factor is refuelling infrastructure and as long as this is dominated by the oil companies wanting to sell oil-based fuel this makes it hard. This is where the federal government could play a role.

We do need fuel self-sustainability which means getting off imported petroleum products onto sustainable locally-produced energy sources. Basically these are electricity and natural gas. Battery cars can't last the distance, which leaves CNG (or CNG-electric hybrid).
And some Ethanol from OUR farmers which keeps OUR money here...
One of our biggest polluters is the electric coal generation .. If elect cars are going to use this fuel ?? It may not be as C02 friendly as it seems...
__________________
Real cars are not driven by front wheels,real cars lift them!!...
BABYS ARE BOTTLE FED, REAL MEN GET BLOWN.
Don't be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark...Professionals built the Titanic!
Dart 330ci block turbo black pearl EBXR8 482 rwkw..
Daily driver GTE FG..
Projects http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=107711
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...8+turbo&page=4
ebxr8240 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2008, 12:29 PM   #68
new2ford
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
new2ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven
Posts: 3,161
Default

^^
Yes I forgot about ethanol though it's not used as a fuel on its own yet.

With electricity generation at least there can be alternative sources of 'fuel', but all still local - wind, hydro, nuclear etc. Plus carbon capture possibilities. Point is we should be aiming for energy self-reliance and get away from imported petroleum altogether.

But back to the subject I would prefer an LPG Falcon to a Prius any day. Prius is an expensive feel-good toy for the rich. When will we get a gas Territory I wonder?
new2ford is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2008, 12:55 PM   #69
burnz
VFII SS UTE
 
burnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 6,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LOCO XP
The problem is far greater than mentioned. Saw a doco on SBS a while back regarding the Pious and its effect on a town in Colorado. To paraphrase:\

...There is a cloudy layer hanging in the atmosphere of town, the ranger points out that the clouds aren’t smog, rather it is smug from the self-satisfied garbage the citizens have been spewing into the air and too much smug in the air leads to “global laming.” ... Pious owners are also
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...VideoID=272288
the actual show
__________________
I don't often hear the sound of a screaming LSX.
But when I do, So do the neighbours..
GO SOUTHS
burnz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2008, 01:53 PM   #70
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,699
Default

http://www.thecarconnection.com/arti...oding-the-myth

debunking a few myths.

while i am by no means 'pro prius' or hybrid for that matter, most of that is due to the large distances i like to drive and the initial up front premium you pay for a hybrid vehicle. also even though the nickel mining procedures are vastly improved, hybrids still cost more to manufacture than a normal petrol car so there are still a lot of misinformation by the media regarding these cars.

just thought i'd put the link up which i came accross a while ago regarding the mining of nickel and its many uses. to blame all of the 'dead zone' and pollution etc on the prius and other hybrids is a bit unfair.
prydey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-11-2008, 11:06 PM   #71
Daymoe
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,082
Default

http://carsales.com.au/car-review/3012926.aspx

While not a Prius, or a Hybrid, an electric Hyundai Getz!

2 gears, top speed of 120km/h and costs $2.50 for 100km of driving, not bad.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by EviLkarL
How about you start your trip at the Christmas Island Refugee and detention centre. After a short 6 year stay you can turn around and go back to where you came from. lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourbastard
ive got the weight gain bit mastered, Colonel Sanders is my personal trainer.

As to weight loss, nah, im a fat bastard and proud of it, im going to die from a massive heart attack, for theres nothing worse then lying around in hospital dying from nothing.
Daymoe is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-12-2008, 01:00 PM   #72
mcflux
Banned
Donating Member1
 
mcflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr_Hoon
I pointed out that for some people the environment is more important than money. So if they buy the Prius thinking they are saving the environment, then good on them. Various people on here were making a "but it's more expensive" argument, which may be useful for understanding why they don't buy the cars, but it isn't useful for understanding why people do buy them.
lol. Those people buying the Prius for "environmental reasons" are being stooged. I refer to the 11ty posts on here regarding all the nasties that are used for the battery/electric systems.

Quote:
The day Ford, or anyone else for that matter, produces an affordable all electric car I can drive for my commute then I'll buy it. I want the low rpm torque. Plus I actually enjoy driving. If I had my way, I would save driving my petrol cars for the weekend instead of ruining them with the sh!tfight of the daily commute.
Sounds like you live in the city. Are you in a situation where public transport is a viable option? And before people start referring to the crapness of the public transport system (I fully agree on this BTW), one could always catch a slightly earlier train in to work, to give say 15-30 minutes' leeway in case there are delays. Rock up early at work? Have a coffee & read the paper
mcflux is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-12-2008, 01:18 PM   #73
SM1DY
LIKE A BOSS 351
 
SM1DY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 2,779
Default

Ahh, the irony. This car is fuel efficient and will protect the earths future. But in making it, we're destroying the environment!
SM1DY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL