|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-10-2018, 11:23 AM | #31 | |||
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
Quote:
https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/f...n-at-ces-2018/ |
|||
10-10-2018, 11:52 AM | #32 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,064
|
Yeah, I was referring to a standard protocol for ALL manufacturers, as in an industry standard. Having each manufacturer trying to come up with the best system may be all well and good, but they will need some standards to be able to communicate to all other vehicles or it’s just a sales gimmick as far as I’m concerned. People will expect a car to respond in a certain way...oh but wait...that’s a XYZ and my car doesn’t communicate with that. End result is no intruder prevention logic, just avoidance. Now that’s poorly lacking.
Then there will be the ongoing updates as unforseen incidents happen. Then who is responsible for keeping their vehicles updated? There will be a new breed of automation dependant muppets who will be even more dumbed down than now if that’s possible. Will it all happen? Yeah probably. Will it solve present issues? Maybe. Will it introduce new issues? Definately. |
||
This user likes this post: |
10-10-2018, 01:01 PM | #33 | |||
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
Quote:
|
|||
21-06-2019, 02:29 AM | #34 | ||||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, Northern Suburbs
Posts: 5,011
|
Quote:
Why? Quote:
This was mostly a "thinking aloud" exercise. Still contemplating adding a Mondeo to the stable. I think the MD has these systems on most models. IIRC the MC might have had something on the Titanium. But either way, I guess its just a "nice to have" feature. Last edited by Crazy Dazz; 21-06-2019 at 02:36 AM. |
||||
22-06-2019, 07:26 AM | #35 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 924
|
I would suggest that if you are interested in these driver aids so you can have a nap or zone out on your commute, a bus or train is a better option for you.
While I reckon adaptive cruise control would be the bees knees, surely lane assist would be more of a hazard in traffic. Even resisting your sharp turn before letting you make it, or forcing you to hit the blinker or the disengage button can reduce reaction times in a potential collision. |
||
This user likes this post: |
25-06-2019, 11:06 PM | #36 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 495
|
Years and years away.
Even tightly designed hardware and software solutions like an iPhone have issues and crash and need reboots etc I work in IT and I’ll be the last to trust a Jetsons mobile, no way would I even think about it for years. True Level 5 automation is way way way away from the tech of today. Sure progress is being made rapidly, but also consider the time of transition....Will the roads ever really have 100% level 5 cars all networked etc? No. |
||