Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > Non Ford Related Community Forums > The Bar

The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2006, 06:44 PM   #1
HTCURRY
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 53
Default Vindication...belated...but vindication nevertheless

Quote:
A Supreme Court judge has ordered the release of a farmer who killed a gangster who had terrorised his family in the NSW central west.

Justice Michael Adams, at a sentencing hearing in the NSW Supreme Court in Orange, questioned whether the man, Timothy John Nam, should have been charged at all.

Justice Adams said the case was one of the most troubling he had ever heard and that Nam barely deserved even the downgraded manslaughter charge to which he had pleaded guilty.
read the entire article: http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/...198196533.html


Its never a good thing when a human being is killed...but good to see a judge for once use common sense and realize this person acted violently as a last resort, and only because of police apathy.

EDIT: oops I made a typo...in the thread title it should be VINdication not VICdication, hopefully a mod will correct the mistake...thanks in advance.

HTCURRY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-08-2006, 06:53 PM   #2
VSSII
Regular Member
 
VSSII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 186
Default

I find it appaling that judges and magistrates who are employed to do the same job can have such differing views when presented with the same information. They're not talking about whether a Ford is better than a holden. They are talking about imprisoning a man for a few years of his life! In a matter such as that the police can't exercise any discretion and have to act on the information provided. At the end of the day it's only their job to present the information to the courts. Buuuut we sure don't live in a perfect world and I see no logical solution available. Think I'll just hope it doesn't happen to me!
VSSII is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-08-2006, 07:05 PM   #3
Kryton
 
Kryton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,292
Default

i was reading the article in the paper today about the whole situation....appaling to say the least. IMO they got what they deserved and hopefully they will do some heavy jail time for their actions.
good to see that the innocent party have had justice served on their part (finally).
Kryton is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL