Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-03-2010, 04:22 PM   #31
Fordman1
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
Fordman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brazen
Surely he has breached a government employee code of conduct for airing negative remarks about a private company.

I mean even if he is right, he has no right to talk like this to the media and inflict the level of damage it does. Even though I do think Ford AU has no one to blame but themselves for people thinking these things.

Maybe so, but perhaps he really does know something...

I think "Wally" may also be onto something also ...
Fordman1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 04:38 PM   #32
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,412
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Ford has just spent:
- $230 million on the Ecoboost I-4 Falcon
- $20 million on I-6 upgrades for Euro I-V
- $??? million on new Territory top hat and V6 Diesel engine
- $??? million on new Liquid Injection LPG for Falcon
- $??? million on new V8 for Falcon

What on earth makes them think Ford is pulling out of Australia?


HEAD !

Last edited by jpd80; 18-03-2010 at 04:43 PM.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 04:51 PM   #33
irlewy86
Meep Meep
 
irlewy86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southside
Posts: 1,513
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wally
Last week I have the rare ocassion to read the March issue of the Top Gear rag. Not being one to subscribe to motoring gossip columnists I actually read an article by some writer giving a bit of stick to other writers who willingly put their names on Ford/Holden/etc press releases, but at the same time pointing out that he and other like minded were invited to Detroit where the secret squirell stuff was presumably laid out for those who would listen

Please correct me if I'm wrong here as I'm running on on old fart memory. He points out that the softening up exercise is in play, with a careful and orchestrated campaign to get the loyals onside and comfortable with FWD and therefore the Taurus import.

As far as Burella goes, heading up a program for a small car with a big corporate support system in place to grow market share is far different from running a small operation with instructions to stop the bleed and hold on.
Where they wearing tin foil hats when this was discussed this. As to why some inner circle types would leak this information to hacks when it isn't even a formal plan inside the Ford world is enough to dismiss it as "swear filter prohibits speaking of bull related products"

The hacks are sourcing their information from eachother and the game of chinese whispers is getting quite overdone. :togo:
__________________
Thundering on....
irlewy86 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 04:53 PM   #34
Dave_au
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern Sydney
Posts: 1,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
Ford has just spent:
- $230 million on the Ecoboost I-4 Falcon
- $20 million on I-6 upgrades for Euro I-V
- $??? million on new Territory top hat and V6 Diesel engine
- $??? million on new Liquid Injection LPG for Falcon
- $??? million on new V8 for Falcon
That's not a lot of money to a corporation the size of ford - $260m is roughly the revenue (note NOT profit) from the sale of 7,000 - 8,000 cars. In reality it's probably equivalient to the profit on a years production.

Regardless, I don't think FoMoCo will be supporting their little FOA much as they did prior to the GFC, and I struggle to see how FOA will be able to support a strong business case for a stand-alone updated falcon given the sales performance of the current series.
Dave_au is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 04:58 PM   #35
Blue_XR
Regular Member
 
Blue_XR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 468
Default

It amazes me the thoughts people have from that article. Anyway I went to write a response i submitted it and got the following:

Quote:
Please note that we are not able to publish all the comments that we receive, and that we may edit some comments to ensure their suitability for publishing.

Feedback will be rejected if it does not add to a debate, or is a purely personal attack, or is offensive, repetitious, illegal or meaningless, or contains clear errors of fact.

Although we try to run feedback just as it is received, we reserve the right to edit or delete any and all material.
Now is it me or do these guys at news.com.au love to slander the local product. From the comments that i read it seems that they will let anyone write anything as long as it is negative to the falcon. When I wrote my reply there was 234 comments already......
__________________
YouTube channel: Modaufy Garage
https://www.youtube.com/c/ModaufyGarage
Blue_XR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 04:59 PM   #36
Gobes32
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Gobes32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,021
Default

Common sense would suggest that the Australian market is probably big enough for two manufacturers, not three. Ford's biggest problem is that Holden have the dinky-di aussie thing all wrapped up and Toyota survive purely on their export operations. It doesn't leave anywhere for Ford to go. Business is a funny thing in that the person with the best product to sell does not always win........
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
A G8E would be good if Ford marketed squarely at Calais V8 owners. They need to bring back the walking fingers like in the initial FG ads, but this time have the fingers crushing Calais' as they walk along, with some relaxing background Led Zeppelin music and Marcos Ambrose in stubbies and singlet driving it.
Gobes32 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 05:10 PM   #37
snappy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
snappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burnz
ford in oz need to drop the i6 and make v6's for export.
Why ?
snappy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 05:15 PM   #38
snappy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
snappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
Ford has just spent:
- $230 million on the Ecoboost I-4 Falcon
- $20 million on I-6 upgrades for Euro I-V
- $??? million on new Territory top hat and V6 Diesel engine
- $??? million on new Liquid Injection LPG for Falcon
- $??? million on new V8 for Falcon

What on earth makes them think Ford is pulling out of Australia?


]

Im pretty sure most of that cash came from the goverments green fund
snappy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 05:15 PM   #39
XR_6falcon
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Suburbs, Mexico
Posts: 483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gobes32
Business is a funny thing in that the person with the best product to sell does not always win........

That seems to be the biggest problem here. Second biggest problem is the media especially when they are a bunch of clowns and the public's blind following of them... The precived image of ford isn't all too flash, I have seen this first hand at some of the reactions of the "consumer". I believe if ford was to sink some serious effort into a ad campaign promoting how good their product really is, it would do wonders for sales.


Are you listening ford? :togo:
__________________
Big dreams, not enough money

Smoke tyres, not drugs
XR_6falcon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 05:17 PM   #40
TUF_302
The Vengeful One
Donating Member1
 
TUF_302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tazzy
Posts: 12,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe5619
His also the only one in 3-4 years to turn a profit!!
Here here!!, if he is making us money, he is worth keeping!!
__________________
TUF_302 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 05:21 PM   #41
snappy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
snappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR_6falcon
That seems to be the biggest problem here. Second biggest problem is the media especially when they are a bunch of clowns and the public's blind following of them... The precived image of ford isn't all too flash, I have seen this first hand at some of the reactions of the "consumer". I believe if ford was to sink some serious effort into a ad campaign promoting how good their product really is, it would do wonders for sales.


Are you listening ford? :togo:

I dont think there products are the issue .
Its the image ford have i reckon .
It kind of like the collingwood footy club . Got a good member base with devoted fans but everyone else hates them.
snappy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 05:22 PM   #42
Fordman1
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
Fordman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe5619
His also the only one in 3-4 years to turn a profit!!
No....

not yet...
Fordman1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 05:37 PM   #43
Stattic
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Stattic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wretched
And how many here have a different attitude when it comes to Holden? When articles portraying Holden in bad light appear, many here have a laugh and think it is funny. Not nice when it is on the other foot?
It's a different story when it's true..
__________________
Current
Blueprint 03 xr8
5 speed manual, Difilippo Quad Big Boy system, BPR CAI, BPR Custom tune, Underdrives
256rwkw

BA manual Typhoon
Fully optioned, 340rwkw@16psi (thanks Bluepower)!


The old ride....
AU Fairmont, cammed beast, R.I.P you made my p plate years bearable!
150.8rwkw courtesy BPR
Stattic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 05:53 PM   #44
bobthebilda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,242
Default

Gee, give the guy a break. He is simply stating from an unbiased position. Everyone treats his comments with contempt, yet take it as word, when the tax payer subsidised CEO's of these car companies, state 1) we havent made profits for 6 years 2) our assets are less than our liabilities 3) Only 1 in 8 australian buyers buy our cars, yet we are a viable industry thanks to those 700,000 australians who pay 5% more each year for their imported car, so they can subsidise our incompetence. Imagine the uproar if the government gave other workers a $12,000 subsidy each year like they give each of the 40,000 (yes only .03% of the australian workforce) workers in the car manufacturing industry.
bobthebilda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 06:11 PM   #45
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,412
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snappy
Im pretty sure most of that cash came from the goverments green fund
No it didn't:
-Ford : $42 million
- Holden: $149 million
- Toyota: $35 million

Add up the cost of New Territory, V6 Diesel and Falcon upgrades
and you're looking just short of a Billion dollars...

Last edited by jpd80; 18-03-2010 at 06:19 PM.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 06:20 PM   #46
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,412
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobthebilda
Gee, give the guy a break. He is simply stating from an unbiased position. Everyone treats his comments with contempt, yet take it as word, when the tax payer subsidised CEO's of these car companies, state 1) we havent made profits for 6 years 2) our assets are less than our liabilities 3) Only 1 in 8 australian buyers buy our cars, yet we are a viable industry thanks to those 700,000 australians who pay 5% more each year for their imported car, so they can subsidise our incompetence. Imagine the uproar if the government gave other workers a $12,000 subsidy each year like they give each of the 40,000 (yes only .03% of the australian workforce) workers in the car manufacturing industry.
So how does he explain the $1.8 billion that Ford is spending
on R & D centre and testing laboratories in Australia...

His statements just don't add up....
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 07:02 PM   #47
tranquilized
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,112
Default

Of the three local manufactures, my money would be on Toyota closing shop first. (As long as Falcon is RWD)
They've already indicated that a strong aussie dollar makes local production less viable, and right now its pretty damn strong. Their products can be made identically in any country, and the only people who'd notice would be Toyota employees...
tranquilized is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 07:19 PM   #48
XR_6falcon
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Suburbs, Mexico
Posts: 483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snappy
I dont think there products are the issue .
Its the image ford have i reckon .
It kind of like the collingwood footy club . Got a good member base with devoted fans but everyone else hates them.


I didnt say the products are the issue.....












oh and i do hate collingwood
__________________
Big dreams, not enough money

Smoke tyres, not drugs
XR_6falcon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 07:54 PM   #49
roughnecks
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brazen
Surely he has breached a government employee code of conduct for airing negative remarks about a private company.

I mean even if he is right, he has no right to talk like this to the media and inflict the level of damage it does. Even though I do think Ford AU has no one to blame but themselves for people thinking these things.
We could just label them anti Australian and have them deported.
roughnecks is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 08:14 PM   #50
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,412
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

This could be a difficult month for Marin Burela....
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 09:12 PM   #51
rodderz
.
 
rodderz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bundoora
Posts: 7,199
Default

jeez, look at what some morries put in the comments section. Some people are so misinformed it's a joke
http://www.news.com.au/business/ford...-1225842111059

Comments like
Who cares, ford are US (GM are not?)
They have been stuck in the 70's with the cars
Fuel thirsty (not as thirsty as the commies but)
Keep getting govt handouts (Holden could be dead without the US GM bailout)
rodderz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 09:21 PM   #52
Chilliman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Chilliman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 622
Default

I think Toyota will be the first to shut up shop. They already closed their engine assembly plant. They are very close to the edge in terms of deciding wether to continue with manufacturing in Australia or just shut up shut and become an import only operation. They must be analysing Mitsubishi continuously now that they appear to be doing better in Australia since they closed down their manufacting operations down under.
__________________
Quote:
From www.motortrend.com

"Torque is the new horsepower"
Chilliman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 09:24 PM   #53
FordFalconBF
2008 BF Futura
 
FordFalconBF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Adelaide, S.A.
Posts: 595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irlewy86
Dear F*&%wit,

Ford recently invested over 1 Billion dollars in their engineering operation. They are not going anywhere anytime soon.

Yours Sincerely,
Common Bloody Sense
I worked at Mitsubishi until they closed.. they invested millions and millions in a new robot press to press out one piece body sides. welding robots and other factory upgrades and R&D... they still closed... I am big Ford fan and definitely don't want them to close... None of these stories are productive. I was sick of the stories about Mitsubishi and am now sick of these Stories about Ford..
__________________
2008 BF Falcon Futura
2009 BF Falcon Wagon Dedicated LPG

Previous Cars:
2003 BA Falcon Wagon Dedicated LPG
1999 Ford Fairlane Ghia
XF Fairmont Ghia
Escort MK2 RS2000 Replica
FordFalconBF is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-03-2010, 10:32 PM   #54
snappy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
snappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR_6falcon
I didnt say the products are the issue...
Yeah i know mate i was just adding to your post. Allthough i didn't put it together well at all .
snappy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-03-2010, 12:07 AM   #55
bobthebilda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,242
Default

JPD, could you please show me where it is stated that Ford are investing $1.8 billion on a R&D centre and testing labs in Australia. I guess a company like Ford Australia, with a $0 asset base, and negative cash flow, will be borrowing that money. It is very much in my interest to divest myself of the shares of the bank who will be lending Ford Australia that money. Or has Peter Garratt taken over from Kim Carr, and Fords thinking is that they have fooled hundreds of millions out of Kamikaze Kim, and are drooling that if they insulate the falcon roofs, Peter will come with bucket loads of cash.
bobthebilda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-03-2010, 12:12 AM   #56
burnz
VFII SS UTE
 
burnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 6,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snappy
Why ?
there is no market for an i6.

company's after a crate unit need it to be flexable.
__________________
I don't often hear the sound of a screaming LSX.
But when I do, So do the neighbours..
GO SOUTHS
burnz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-03-2010, 12:17 AM   #57
snappy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
snappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burnz
there is no market for an i6.

company's after a crate unit need it to be flexable.
Ok i see what you mean i thought you may have been suggesting the v6 is superior to the i6.

I did hear somtime ago the ford aus were looking in to importing the i6 for a company that builds aircraft tow vechicles . Haven't heard anything more on this though
snappy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-03-2010, 12:51 AM   #58
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default

i think bean counters rule toyota much more than ford, i think the last time toyota was going to pull out the govenrment stepped in and sweetend the pot for them other wise they would`nt be here, i think they have pulled up stumps before.
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-03-2010, 12:52 AM   #59
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
Ford has just spent:
- $230 million on the Ecoboost I-4 Falcon
- $20 million on I-6 upgrades for Euro I-V
- $??? million on new Territory top hat and V6 Diesel engine
- $??? million on new Liquid Injection LPG for Falcon
- $??? million on new V8 for Falcon

What on earth makes them think Ford is pulling out of Australia?


HEAD !
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-03-2010, 01:08 AM   #60
Stattic
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Stattic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,566
Default

just read the comments... my god it is sad
__________________
Current
Blueprint 03 xr8
5 speed manual, Difilippo Quad Big Boy system, BPR CAI, BPR Custom tune, Underdrives
256rwkw

BA manual Typhoon
Fully optioned, 340rwkw@16psi (thanks Bluepower)!


The old ride....
AU Fairmont, cammed beast, R.I.P you made my p plate years bearable!
150.8rwkw courtesy BPR
Stattic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL