Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-03-2011, 12:36 AM   #31
SM1DY
LIKE A BOSS 351
 
SM1DY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 2,779
Default Re: Return of the 351...could it be???

Quote:
Originally Posted by FPV GTHO
But then why would FPV and Ford send themselves down different development paths?
I understand there is issues with getting this car on the road and the required regulations along with engineering, but all I'm saying is that this would be a glorious send-off for the Falcon considering the original 5.8 was in a Ford not an FPV. I'm not so naive to think that this is any chance of happening, but I'd like to see Ford do something unique for the consumer to see the end of an icon.
SM1DY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-03-2011, 09:00 AM   #32
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default Re: Return of the 351...could it be???

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAT600
The 6.2L as found in the Raptor and Superduty is nothing like the Modular as far as dimensions go.

It uses a 115mm bore spacing (Modular is 100mm) and the 6.2L Bore is 4.02" compared to Modular 3.552"..... the 6.2L only has a 3.74" throw crank compared to the 5.4L Mod's 4.165"

Daniel
I said the 6.2 was close to the 351 (not modular), as in bore size, and a little bit longer stroke than the 351. 351 has 4'' bore x 3.5'' stroke. The 6.2 has a 4'' bore with a 3.75'' stroke.
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL