Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-03-2017, 08:08 AM   #31
Dr Terry
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,400
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by malazn mafia View Post
Nissan would have to be the only car maker who has been in bed with both team blue and team red:

- VL Commodore / R31 Skyline (RB30 engine)
- Holden Astra/Nissan Pulsar
- Holden Vector/Nissan Pulsar Sedan
- Ford XF Ute/Nissan XF-N Ute
- Ford Maverick/Nissan Patrol
- Ford Corsair/Nissan Pintara
What about Mazda ?

In the 70s, there was the Mazda Roadpacer, which was a Holden Premier with a Mazda Rotary donk fitted. Then later on there were a multitude of Ford/Mazda offerings.

Dr Terry
Dr Terry is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 13-03-2017, 09:18 AM   #32
paulie
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 269
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

The maverick only ever came out with a carburetor on the 4.2L petrol.
Where as the nissan came out with efi.
This seemed to have solved "some" of the fuel consumption issues.

Im on my 2nd GQ 1st one was an early carby model (same as maverick) which was just a base model ST.
I upgraded to a later model GQ Ti with all the options was a very low km 1 owner.
Definitely wont be selling in a hurry. Great 4x4.
paulie is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 13-03-2017, 10:46 AM   #33
ken1939
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 370
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Thanks for all the responses. I knew they were Ford in name only, but the few examples I have seen for sale were reasonable and pretty clean. Times change and sometimes vehicles change or cease production, and from the vehicles we have here in the US I thought it might be a neat niche vehicle around here.
ken1939 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2017, 10:57 AM   #34
Ford17
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ford17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,304
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Something possibly forgotten over time was there were around 12 Peter Brock-modified Mavericks produced in the early 1990's.



A dedicated register of them is kept here: http://www.brockfords.com.au/the-cars/brock-mavericks
Ford17 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 13-03-2017, 01:30 PM   #35
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Nice jumper Brocky.
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 13-03-2017, 02:57 PM   #36
Trevor 57
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Trevor 57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,769
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford17 View Post
Something possibly forgotten over time was there were around 12 Peter Brock-modified Mavericks produced in the early 1990's.

A dedicated register of them is kept here:
Brock did a speaking gig at a place I worked at and he showed up in a Maverick, it was a bit of a talking point I can tell ya
Trevor 57 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2017, 03:20 PM   #37
TUF_302
The Vengeful One
Donating Member1
 
TUF_302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tazzy
Posts: 12,765
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

I Have a Patrol,or Maverick depending on how you look at it lol, but yeah they're all Nissans really, mines a 94 model, TD42t, did a big trip in it yesterday and did close to 600ks, and still has some fuel left, which i thinks pretty good for a 23 year old Vehicle with 337,000ks on the clock
__________________
TUF_302 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 13-03-2017, 03:25 PM   #38
mike_nofx
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mike_nofx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,125
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by .:4:. View Post
No comment towards the reputation jeep have formed, defenders did alright, and I'm yet to see a g wagon that's dirty.
Reputation aside it's still one of the only real 4x4s left.

I'd happily drive my Wrangler across Australia and not be concerned about reliability issues. With the reliable 2.8 VM Motori diesel and bulletproof Chrysler 545rfe box.

There's no current Ford available I'd trust the reliability of over my Wrangler.
mike_nofx is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-03-2017, 04:09 PM   #39
2011G6E
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
2011G6E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Ah, the heady days of badge engineering...
There was actually method to your madness if you bought a Nissan "Ute"...a rebadged XF Falcon...because if you bought it as a Ford, you only got the 12 month/24,000km warranty. BUT if you bought the exact same car badged as a Nissan, you got Nissans standard 24 month/48,000 warranty.

Of course it worked in reverse as well...but a Nissan Patrol and you got 24/48 warranty...but the exact same thing badged as a Ford Maverick and you only got the Ford warranty of 12/24...
2011G6E is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 16-03-2017, 12:30 AM   #40
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by malazn mafia View Post
Is the 4.2 that motor they are boosting to insane levels in Abu Dhabi and destroying Lamborginis and Ferraris with?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHf2ejIZ44g

Not in this one that was on the Grand Tour.
It's a highly modified GTR with a Patrol shell literally.
~1900HP
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-03-2017, 06:46 AM   #41
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,422
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

This is where its at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek0Zf64NVso

search youtube for sand hill climbs too.
__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 16-03-2017, 06:48 AM   #42
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Like these guys ..... nuts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEY49uRW69Q
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 16-03-2017, 07:24 AM   #43
Trevor 57
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Trevor 57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,769
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

I like this one - sorry non FB people

https://www.facebook.com/bo.hansen.3...5568530540174/

Got a bit of torque happening out of the diesel, I can't make out if it is a 4.2 though


here it is on Youtube, the Patrol is at the 6:20 mark
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNSY...ature=youtu.be
Trevor 57 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 16-03-2017, 02:09 PM   #44
Vesper Martini
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Vesper Martini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Victoria
Posts: 7,854
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Terry View Post
What about Mazda ?

In the 70s, there was the Mazda Roadpacer, which was a Holden Premier with a Mazda Rotary donk fitted. Then later on there were a multitude of Ford/Mazda offerings.

Dr Terry
Wow never knew about that, what a disaster found a clip of one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDa-h3RcTkk

also noticed there was a Isuzu Statesman Deville
__________________
______________________________
2015 Territory Titanium RWD Diesel - SOLD
2016 BMW X5 xdrive 30D Msport
Seadoo Challenger 210SE 310HP
Vesper Martini is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 16-03-2017, 02:24 PM   #45
Dr Terry
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,400
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bevsta007 View Post
also noticed there was a Isuzu Statesman Deville
Yeah, but in those days GM owned a controlling interest in Isuzu, in much the same way that Ford used to own a controlling interest in Mazda.

Dr Terry
Dr Terry is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 17-03-2017, 11:18 AM   #46
snowcone
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 494
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

I had the diesel as a company car when I worked in the mines and it was so gutless it was dangerous.
You had to have at least 3 kilometres of clear road ahead if you wanted pass anything.
Rode pretty rough on the highway too
__________________
1940 Ford Deluxe Hotrod
1956 Ford Mainline
1958 Ford Customline
2002 Ford Explorer

I only drive V8's
snowcone is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-03-2017, 12:00 PM   #47
XY Chaser
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 77
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Good friend of mine bought his Nissan new in 1998 - 4.2 diesel 5speed manual. used it as his everyday transport towed his extremely large caravan all over Australia. Last year decided to update and brought a new Ranger XLT auto to get around in and tow his caravan. Still has the Nissan and prefers to use it rather than the Ranger. The Nissan has 520,000k's up and all he has ever done to it is replace the front brake pads once and it's had one wheel alignment. Still on the original clutch, and only ever been serviced when it was supposed to be. He looks after his cars and it still looks new. Will the Ranger be as reliable? I doubt it.
XY Chaser is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 17-03-2017, 12:53 PM   #48
Tassie f100
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,878
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowcone View Post
I had the diesel as a company car when I worked in the mines and it was so gutless it was dangerous.
You had to have at least 3 kilometres of clear road ahead if you wanted pass anything.
Rode pretty rough on the highway too
You would have found if you took your left foot off the brake whilst pushing the accelerator with the right foot it would have performed much better, or even releasing the park brake before driving makes passing easier
Tassie f100 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 17-03-2017, 01:36 PM   #49
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,422
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowcone View Post
I had the diesel as a company car when I worked in the mines and it was so gutless it was dangerous.
You had to have at least 3 kilometres of clear road ahead if you wanted pass anything.
Rode pretty rough on the highway too
Agreed. We turbo'd our 4.2 which made it heaps better.
__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 17-03-2017, 02:23 PM   #50
malazn mafia
Boss 335
 
malazn mafia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,330
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by XY Chaser View Post
Good friend of mine bought his Nissan new in 1998 - 4.2 diesel 5speed manual. used it as his everyday transport towed his extremely large caravan all over Australia. Last year decided to update and brought a new Ranger XLT auto to get around in and tow his caravan. Still has the Nissan and prefers to use it rather than the Ranger. The Nissan has 520,000k's up and all he has ever done to it is replace the front brake pads once and it's had one wheel alignment. Still on the original clutch, and only ever been serviced when it was supposed to be. He looks after his cars and it still looks new. Will the Ranger be as reliable? I doubt it.
They don't make cars like they used to. The Japs really had it going on in the early 90s. I'd put my money on a early to mid 90s Jap 4 x 4, rather than a post 2000s or 2010s Thai Hilux or Ranger, any day of the week.
malazn mafia is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 20-03-2017, 04:44 PM   #51
snowcone
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 494
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tassie f100 View Post
You would have found if you took your left foot off the brake whilst pushing the accelerator with the right foot it would have performed much better, or even releasing the park brake before driving makes passing easier
Not even remotely funny.
These 4WD's were gutless and no driving technique could improve them.
However, they did achieve very good fuel economy, probably because they were hardly burning any up.
__________________
1940 Ford Deluxe Hotrod
1956 Ford Mainline
1958 Ford Customline
2002 Ford Explorer

I only drive V8's
snowcone is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-03-2017, 01:08 AM   #52
TheInterceptor
Cruising...
 
TheInterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,819
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

They seem pretty rough and tumble considering ive seen people smash about in these without miraculously shearing major suspension parts. But id say things would often be replaced because with that kind of driving. Slow rattly and pumps out more soot than a volcano. Commonly found destroying local tracks and tailgating people because owners think they are king dick, especially when lifted 6"+. Very over rated.

This pic below was sent to me a while ago:

__________________
FBT '98
BA XT '04
F100 4x4 '82

Subaru Outback '02
TheInterceptor is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-03-2017, 07:16 AM   #53
Trevor 57
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Trevor 57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,769
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mont5.0 View Post
Agreed. We turbo'd our 4.2 which made it heaps better.
I put a Safari tubo kit on mine, gave it about 40-50% increase in power, made it a lot better car


Some of these numb-nuts who are ****-canning have to understand they were designed back in the mid-80's, not yesterday, big trucks (KW etc) were just coming to grips with electronic diesel technology, the stuff we are seeing in current 4x4 diesels is all because of the stuff they did with big trucks back then

The GQ's were miles ahead of their competitors at the time, Toyota responded (some time later) with the 80 Series, motor was good but it handled on corners like a bag of wet wheat.
Trevor 57 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 21-03-2017, 07:45 AM   #54
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,422
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheInterceptor View Post
They seem pretty rough and tumble considering ive seen people smash about in these without miraculously shearing major suspension parts. But id say things would often be replaced because with that kind of driving. Slow rattly and pumps out more soot than a volcano. Commonly found destroying local tracks and tailgating people because owners think they are king dick, especially when lifted 6"+. Very over rated.

This pic below was sent to me a while ago:

image
You really have no idea!
__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 21-03-2017, 09:00 AM   #55
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,422
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken1939 View Post
I see quite a few of them for sale, but wanted to get impressions of them in general from the people that are in the know. It might speak volumes that there are not any "Maverick" links on the site
I had a 4.2 Diesel GQ (maverick) For years. They are a good bit of kit and basically Bulletproof! I traversed the whole East Coast of Australia in mine over the years, including Camerons corner (NSW) and Tasmania. She also saw her fair share of 4WD parks and weekend get aways. Cheap to run and not that expensive if you maintain them. Mine had 4" suspension Lift, 2" tyre Lift, Lockers, Transfer case reduction gears and Turbo conversion.

Would i own another one? Hell yeah, if i had the room.



__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
4 users like this post:
Old 21-03-2017, 11:22 AM   #56
rods falcon
Long time lurking
 
rods falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: murtoa
Posts: 175
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Owning both a GQ Patrol and a Ranger, there is no comparison. The Ranger is better for daily driving and mild off road work, the Patrol is a lot better when the off road gets serious. The ford parts did improve the Patrol however, a set of BA XR seats made it a lot more comfortable.
__________________
BA Falcon XR8 Devil R - UA Everest Sport - Next Gen Ranger XLT v6 - BA Fairlane G220
rods falcon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
4 users like this post:
Old 21-03-2017, 02:35 PM   #57
PALE ALE
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 242
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Owned one for 12 yrs, best vehicle I ever owned
PALE ALE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 21-03-2017, 04:18 PM   #58
GTMOND
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 208
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheInterceptor View Post
They seem pretty rough and tumble considering ive seen people smash about in these without miraculously shearing major suspension parts. But id say things would often be replaced because with that kind of driving. Slow rattly and pumps out more soot than a volcano. Commonly found destroying local tracks and tailgating people because owners think they are king dick, especially when lifted 6"+. Very over rated.

This pic below was sent to me a while ago:

image
Mate let me guess, you drive a landcruiser, or you haven't had much to do with 4WDs.
GTMOND is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 21-03-2017, 06:16 PM   #59
TheInterceptor
Cruising...
 
TheInterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,819
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTMOND View Post
Mate let me guess, you drive a landcruiser, or you haven't had much to do with 4WDs.
No landcruiser. Have experienced 80 series cruisers, a troopy and a 79 series ute along with a GQ wagon similar to above.
Used to have a turbo diesel 4x4 of sorts (that I'm not naming to not be used for fan boy arguments) that was worlds ahead of all of the above. Will never understand the attraction to these tractor like egomobiles. Slow, drives like crap, sounds like crap especially with the popular 3" exhaust and is expensive to run and maintain unless the 5 people I know are all liars.

They will however go far and do incredible things IF fitted with at least one diff lock. I don't get how you people spend $2000 on giant 33"+ tyres and skimp on diffs when one locker will get you further than any tyre.

I understand why the bloke above has what he has living in Sydney, it's the only thing that will actually do the tracks available nearest to Sydney (Newnes, Lithgow area). That place is so chewed up and rutted out (perhaps by 3tonne+ 33" open diffed full sized 4x4's perhaps). I moved from Sydney in 2013 and it was alright still when I had my 4x4. Went back last year and we were struggling to find tracks to do in a new Ranger XLT and modded 79 series.
So fine for maybe 5% of weekly driving, if used once a week Offroad that is.

There's nothing good I can see about these. By all means poke holes in my posts, I know nay sayers who speak against these things are always shot down by the big fan boys and must always have the last word.

Weight destroys tracks. Especially with open diffs. And giant tyres. And then the 4x4 community cry when councils close tracks due to damage. Hmmmmmmm....
__________________
FBT '98
BA XT '04
F100 4x4 '82

Subaru Outback '02
TheInterceptor is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 21-03-2017, 06:24 PM   #60
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,422
Default Re: Ford Maverick ?

Yep RWD falcon wagons and subaru's will get heaps further.
That photo is over 12 years old. Funny how you drag every thread off topic.
Pretty sure OP asked about these cars, not your expert opinion on whats better and what closes tracks..lol..

With a Nissan (maverick) as you would know, being the off road expert that you are, Dont need to skimp on "diffs" as you put it. Diffs are tuff as, as are the transfer cases and gearbox's. Have you ever been to a 4WD comp?? Did you notice that Probably 90%+ of modified vehicles there are Nissan GQ-GU based?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheInterceptor View Post
There's nothing good I can see about these. By all means poke holes in my posts, I know nay sayers who speak against these things are always shot down by the big fan boys and must always have the last word.
Back pedaling much?? You know your going to get shot down, because you dont know what your talking about.
__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC

Last edited by Mont5.0; 21-03-2017 at 06:44 PM.
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL