Ranger Super Duty Confirmed for 2026

[DFB FGXR6]

Ford's intentions are pretty clear with the Super Duty.

Watching the 100-years livestream, Ford are investing in more service points, particularly in rural and remote areas. This will address one of the areas where Toyota have excelled.

They are also setting up a Ford-backed converting network called Ford Pro, think custom service bodies for fleets, fire and police departments ect.

https://www.ford.com.au/ford-pro-convertor/

The Ford ProTM Convertor Program recognises premium convertors across Australia, specialising in multiple and diverse conversions to suit a wide variety of customer requirements.

Ford ProTM Convertors deliver high-quality, reliable conversions on Ford vehicles that customers can trust.

All Ford ProTM Convertors undergo a comprehensive assessment by Ford to ensure the quality of their production and installation methods align with our own quality standards.

You may also notice of the colours shown in the press images, a popular 70-series colour............................














Another interesting feature, Super Duty has an inbuild load scale that displays weight in the tray via the Sync screen.

[Sprintey]

https://www.carexpert.com.au/car-new...-beating-specs

Real, practical enhancements that the target market most probably want. And given all the GVM and loading issues in recent years it's a great solution. More capability from an existing platform. It's an impressive launch.

[Travesty]

This will be a game changer:

- the aftermarket GVM upgrade outfits are toast, this makes a mockery of "GVM upgrades" that are underdone and overpriced
- there will be a wholesale dumping of 79 series and "standard" Rangers on the used market
- Toyota will have something soon enough as a counter, but Nissan and Bitsareshiti are done

[.:4:.]

Originally Posted by Travesty

This will be a game changer:

- the aftermarket GVM upgrade outfits are toast, this makes a mockery of "GVM upgrades" that are underdone and overpriced
- there will be a wholesale dumping of 79 series and "standard" Rangers on the used market
- Toyota will have something soon enough as a counter, but Nissan and Bitsareshiti are done

They haven't announced pricing. I doubt it will be budget friendly. I reckon more function then form, dont mind that. However i see it becoming the bigger flex then a raptor that typically never sees any ute duties let alone even a gravel driveway for the image concious 'big man'. Have i had a ranger, yes. It was a single cab work car used for work. So its not ingnoramos statement i made

[Travesty]

Originally Posted by .:4:.

They haven't announced pricing. I doubt it will be budget friendly. I reckon more function then form, dont mind that. However i see it becoming the bigger flex then a raptor that typically never sees any ute duties let alone even a gravel driveway for the image concious 'big man'. Have i had a ranger, yes. It was a single cab work car used for work. So its not ingnoramos statement i made

If Ford set the price of entry around the $80k mark, they win the internet.

[Rob 351]

I’ll have the above extra cab with tray in that desert sand colour thanks Ford!

[Rastas]

Originally Posted by Travesty

This will be a game changer:

- the aftermarket GVM upgrade outfits are toast, this makes a mockery of "GVM upgrades" that are underdone and overpriced
- there will be a wholesale dumping of 79 series and "standard" Rangers on the used market
- Toyota will have something soon enough as a counter, but Nissan and Bitsareshiti are done

Careful what you wish for -
A Shark version based on Bao 5/8 running gear with over 4.5t towing and 500 to 600kw power at say 15k to 20k less is coming. The other Chinese brands if they see this is the market will follow suit.

[kevino]

Originally Posted by Interceptor

Several years ago a customer ran dually F350's in preference to an N series Isuzu in the same weight class.... simply because "They dont drive like a truck"

Smoo isnt on his own if he hates them, though I would consider "hate" a mild word if describing my feelings towards them.

Which is a bit like trying to get a horse to drink when its prefectly content just standing there and looking at you.....

Disappointing considering how ford managed to produce an RTV with absolutely zero changes to the main body/subframe, neglecting to make the Ranger chassis capable of supporting high or low ride format is exactly that, negligence.

If the vehicle isnt up to towing its rated towing capacity at the posted speed limit, it shouldnt be on the road.
If the driver doesnt feel they are safe driving a legal car & trailer combination at the posted speed limit, they are unsafe to be on the road with that combination, regardless of their speed.

All the gear & no idea.

Whats got me is that if anything, ADDING another model defies logic, the Ranger fills the void at the entry leval of the ute market, the F150 doesnt really do anything a Ranger does except tow 4500kg at its rated GVM with a bigger body while pampering to the yank truck lovers, then theres the F250, with its 4499kg GVM, higher towing capacity again over a F150

A Ranger super duty doesnt really seem to do anything that the F250 doesnt already do, so why create another, unique, development costly model when the F250 already exists, already has import approvals in place and just needs to be built in RHD?

Well.... I suppose you can build a Ranger SD much more cost effectively in Thailand and make more profit than a RHD F250.

My guess on this high gvm ute.
It is there to escape the NVES system!!

[smoo]

Originally Posted by Sprintey

Just read an intro review, looks really good! Well done to the engineers, I can see it being picked for the Lap and towing some truly huge things with big towball downweights - they will be on a winner for sure.

Ford need to add condition of sale, similar to how Ferrari does.

No grey nomads.


That sandy toop or troop colour.
Surely Ford have done that to troll Toyota and the 79 die hards/Ronny Dahl wannabes.

[jpd80]

Originally Posted by kevino

My guess on this high gvm ute.
It is there to escape the NVES system!!

Yes and Paul Maric says as much in his report, It also meets EURO 6.2
and manual REGEN that commercial buyers requested. 130 litre tank,
Heavier suspension and bigger differential

Lots to like but I hope the 130 litre tank becomes an option across all models.

[kevino]

Originally Posted by jpd80

Yes and Paul Maric says as much in his report, It also meets EURO 6.2
and manual REGEN that commercial buyers requested. 130 litre tank,
Heavier suspension and bigger differential

Lots to like but I hope the 130 litre tank becomes an option across all models.

Has the ten speed transmission in these settled down and proved reliable?

[simon varley]

Originally Posted by kevino

Has the ten speed transmission in these settled down and proved reliable?

well, globally, hundreds of thousands have been sold with no issues....

[Travesty]

Originally Posted by simon varley

well, globally, hundreds of thousands have been sold with no issues....

...during the warranty period.

[jpd80]

Originally Posted by kevino

Has the ten speed transmission in these settled down and proved reliable?

A better question would be has Ford customer service gotten any better when things go wrong

[Dr Smith]

Originally Posted by simon varley

well, globally, hundreds of thousands have been sold with no issues....

Just wondering, is it the same box as in Mustang and F-Series and US SUV's and GM products....sales then would be in the several millions if so...

[Sprintey]

The only downside I can see is weight

It seems that today, 2500kg is the new 1600kg

Across the board in the car market. There are some big buddahs getting around on the roads

[Itsme]

Originally Posted by Sprintey

The only downside I can see is weight

It seems that today, 2500kg is the new 1600kg

Across the board in the car market. There are some big buddahs getting around on the roads

Weight is not an issue for this particular vehicle, it is built for a niche market.

[DFB FGXR6]

Originally Posted by Dr Smith

Just wondering, is it the same box as in Mustang and F-Series and US SUV's and GM products....sales then would be in the several millions if so...

The 10-speed was a co-development with GM.....................

"The Ford–GM 10-speed automatic transmission is part of a joint venture between Ford Motor Company and General Motors to design and engineer two transmissions: a longitudinal 10-speed transmission and a transverse 9-speed trans-axle. Each company manufactures its own unique version of the transmissions in its own factories. The 10-speed transmission was designed by Ford, while the 9-speed transmission was designed by GM."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford%E...c_transmission

GM use the 10L designation, Ford use the 10R designation. Both brands have different torque capacities depending on application and engine.

10R60 - Explorer, Ranger and Bronco.

10R80 - Mustang, F-150, Ranger, Everest, Expedition, Transit, Navigator, Police Interceptors, even the VW Amarok.

10R140 - F-Series Super Duty

There are also 10R MHT hybrid designations.

That's a lot of models, then add the GM trucks, SUVs and Camaro, I'd say its well proven by now.

[Travesty]

Originally Posted by Itsme

Weight is not an issue for this particular vehicle, it is built for a niche market.

It isn't because it's niche, it's because weight needs weight. Picture a 90's Corolla with a kerb weight under 1000kg trying to tow anything.

[Fordman1]

Originally Posted by Travesty

It isn't because it's niche, it's because weight needs weight. Picture a 90's Corolla with a kerb weight under 1000kg trying to tow anything.

Lol

Nice name

[Crazy Dazz]

Originally Posted by csi20

Ford has thus far confirmed a 4500kg braked towing capacity, a 4500kg gross vehicle mass (GVM) and a massive 8000kg gross combination mass.

For reference, a standard Ranger XL double-cab 2.0-litre 4x4 automatic has a maximum towing capacity of 3500kg, a GVM of 3250kg and a GCM of 6350kg.

Yeah, but lets keep in mind that those numbers are set by the manufacturer. They're not a result of some objective testing.

I think the rules have changed now, but not so long ago, all you needed to up the GVM was a piece of paper from an engineer. We used to do it for all our mine-spec utes, cos by the time we added all our gear, it didn't leave much for actual payload.

[DFB FGXR6]

Came across this post on Facebook, presenting an interesting point of view regarding allowing anyone to drive such a heavily laden setup without prior experience or driver training.

https://www.facebook.com/smarttouringsystems


"We’re witnessing a pivotal moment in Australian automotive history.
Ford is creating something that everybody wants - but the real question is, should everyone have it? Because once this Pandora’s box is opened, there’s no going back.

That said, hats off to Ford - the specs are nothing short of jaw-dropping.
So below are some points I jammed into Chat GPT and asked for the most sarcastic version as it totally makes more sense this way. Enjoy!

"When I say we’re witnessing automotive history, I mean it in the most explosive way possible. Because you can bet your last dollar this thing is about to spark a full-blown payload and towing arms race. If the other brands don’t pull something magical out of their hat soon, this Super Dooper Ranger Danger (that bit is mine 🤪) is going to steamroll fleet sales and become the one-size-fits-all weapon of choice for anyone wanting to tow, tour, or just feel like the king of the bitumen....with double decker jet ski trailer (also mine😂). The American 1500-class trucks? Yeah, thanks for coming—your services are no longer required and really never were.

Heavy-duty 2500 utes and Isuzu trucks? Great, if you want to take out a second mortgage and have a Light Rigid license. The domestic utes like the D-Max, the very frightened Triton, or the unbreakable timing chain rattling over priced and under specced Hilux have no hope. Oh and the standard non-danger spec Ranger will be worthless. 70 Series LandCruiser? Please. No space, glacially slow, outrageously overpriced…and I say that as someone who's made the mistake twice. $300 000 Series Landcruiser? Cute. Try again.

Now, everything about this Super Dooper Heavy Duty Do-It-All Ranger Danger sounds like a dream come true - until you remember one teeny little thing...

Do we really want the bloke, lady, person (not sure what's allowed there) who’s never towed anything heavier than a lawn mower suddenly cruising down the highway with a 4,500kg guided missile bouncing behind his 3,000kg Danger Ranger? Picture it: overtaking lane, downhill stretch, 50 knots of crosswind - and boom. You’re an unwilling extra in the next action movie.

Maybe : Rangers Gone Wild? that could work😎

Sure, the American 1500s have already been doing this on a car license, but this Ranger? is about to bring this overweight but legally towing thing to the masses. Will this finally trigger some sort of driver training or license upgrade? Maybe. Or maybe we’ll just see another "safety initiative" that suspiciously resembles a revenue stream.

And let's not even start on the aftermarket. How long before someone slaps a GVM upgrade on this beast so it can legally tow 32 tonnes, with a GCM of 67T, ride on 40-inch tyres, with a coil rear end and integrated twin jet ski holders on the roof?

Sorry, got a bit carried away there 😂

And the price for all this ridiculousness? Oh, just a modest $80,000 (I did walk in to Ford today and ask - not locked in, but could be). Pocket change for world domination."

I’ve tried really, really, really hard, not to want one. But here I am, convincing myself that Commander Grey is a totally responsible colour choice 🤯😃😡🤥

Hurry up, Toyota! Put the bloody V6 in the next Hilux/70 series thing and make it just like the one above, and when you do don't double the price and leave the cup holders out. Or I'm out!"

[jpd80]

Jeez, you might have a case if it wasn’t for the fact that plenty of folks have been towing heavy loads
with the older.smaller Landcruiser and Patrols for decades. So while some think that this will open
the floodgates to a tow ratings war, I think prices of SD Ranger will keep this to a reasonable few sales.

And yes,
Training people to tow responsibly should have been part of a drivers licence endorsement years ago
for anything more than a light box trailer. It wouldn’t have to be anything more than a few hours with
an instructor and a decent practical and written test.

[Travesty]

I'm hearing circa $93k for the Supercab, $120k for the Dualcab (XLT trim).

[DFB FGXR6]

Originally Posted by jpd80

Jeez, you might have a case if it wasn’t for the fact that plenty of folks have been towing heavy loads
with the older.smaller Landcruiser and Patrols for decades. So while some think that this will open
the floodgates to a tow ratings war, I think prices of SD Ranger will keep this to a reasonable few sales.

And yes,
Training people to tow responsibly should have been part of a drivers licence endorsement years ago
for anything more than a light box trailer. It wouldn’t have to be anything more than a few hours with
an instructor and a decent practical and written test.

I mean, I have two 500hp V8's in my garage with far more performance than is needed on Australian roads. Following the same mentality, that should mean I'd need a special license or training as well.

When one of my clients bought a sizable caravan last year, due to her husband's failing eyesight, she is the one doing the driving. To her credit, she went and did a trailer towing coarse.

I personally think something like that should be mandatory over a certain size and weight. There are far too many first time caravan owners on the road towing MASSIVE rigs that are bigger than some trucks. The truck driver needs a special license and is required to provide a logbook, and yet there is nothing to stop someone going out and buying a massive caravan and towing it around the country with an equally massive 4WD. I'd wager that is more risky than the truck driver.

[Travesty]

Originally Posted by DFB FGXR6

I mean, I have two 500hp V8's in my garage with far more performance than is needed on Australian roads. Following the same mentality, that should mean I'd need a special license or training as well. When one of my clients bought a sizable caravan last year, due to her husband's failing eyesight, she is the one doing the driving. To her credit, she went and did a trailer towing coarse. I personally think something like that should be mandatory over a certain size and weight. There are far too many first time caravan owners on the road towing MASSIVE rigs that are bigger than some trucks. The truck driver needs a special license and is required to provide a logbook, and yet there is nothing to stop someone going out and buying a massive caravan and towing it around the country with an equally massive 4WD. I'd wager that is more risky than the truck driver.

Agreed however a growing class of truck driver is making first timer ma and pa caravan haulers look like seasoned pros. We deal with the aftermath when they run out of talent on a daily basis.

[naddis01]

I may have missed it but has Ford actually said there is more than one trim level? Pat Callinan said in his reveal video that there is only one trim level. Which makes sense since as it appears from what I've seen to be a mix of XL and XLT parts. Plus they've said the alloy wheels aren't available at launch. They will be added in 6 months. Which also suggests a single trim level.

[CyberWasp]

Its about damn time.
I must admit my standard Thai Special really struggles with my Caravan.
Can't wait to trade it in for a Super Duty.

[DFB FGXR6]

Originally Posted by naddis01

I may have missed it but has Ford actually said there is more than one trim level? Pat Callinan said in his reveal video that there is only one trim level. Which makes sense since as it appears from what I've seen to be a mix of XL and XLT parts. Plus they've said the alloy wheels aren't available at launch. They will be added in 6 months. Which also suggests a single trim level.

It will be offered in XL and XLT trims. Scroll down to the bottom of the Super Duty page, XL is depicted but XLT will be available also -

https://www.ford.com.au/showroom/tru...er/super-duty/

[XR Martin]

The Thai plant where these will be made only make XL, XLS and XLT models. (Auto Alliance)
Someone on another forum tried to order one and was told they can only be ordered via Ford Fleet.