|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-06-2006, 08:24 PM | #61 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
|
|||
09-06-2006, 08:32 PM | #62 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,861
|
Quote:
Tough choice between these two cars. Power aside , there is something about the look of the 300C that makes me want one.....bad. |
|||
09-06-2006, 09:16 PM | #63 | ||||
Cuban... nothing like it
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Watching in amusement
Posts: 11,643
|
Quote:
Sorry But numbers mean squat compared to the driving experience, so please don't become another numbers person on the forums who quotes from magazines, websites and your cousins uncles friends sister. Edit.. I do apreciate you own a F6.
__________________
Quote:
|
||||
09-06-2006, 09:29 PM | #64 | ||
AWD Assassin
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,170
|
Not having personally driven either of them, I'd have to make a decision purely on looks.............300C hands down. It really is the modern day custom "HOT ROD".........and it's a V8....... :voldar02:
__________________
Old RIDE 2006 BFGT Gone but not forgotten New RIDE 2018 AMG Mercedes A45 Angry AWD assassin
|
||
09-06-2006, 09:37 PM | #65 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Is that your face, or did you neck throw up
Posts: 3,041
|
Quote:
|
|||
09-06-2006, 10:13 PM | #66 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 151
|
Quote:
|
|||
09-06-2006, 10:20 PM | #67 | ||
hmm eyebrows
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lower Hunter Valley, NSW
Posts: 2,393
|
Gotta say that I'm a fan of that bad beast 300C with its unbeatable street presence!
__________________
XE 4.9 Falcon S & XA 4.9 Fairmont hardtop |
||
10-06-2006, 12:43 AM | #68 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ipswich QLD
Posts: 4,697
|
i really do like the look off the srt8....but to tell u the truth, by the end of reading this post i was over it.That car will look so out off date in a year for sure.
Esspecially if u have a slower 300c an u dont have 22inch wheels(ouch$/respect)...imagine a phoon with 22s, itd look horn too. I guess well see in some more detailed (unbiased)comparos later in the year...that srt is going to get : |
||
10-06-2006, 09:25 AM | #69 | |||
Cuban... nothing like it
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Watching in amusement
Posts: 11,643
|
Are people acutally aware of the difference of the 300c and the SRT8?
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
10-06-2006, 10:23 AM | #70 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ipswich QLD
Posts: 4,697
|
yep the 300c is the slowwww boring one an the srt8 is the one with the kick engine(the performance model)
|
||
10-06-2006, 11:56 AM | #71 | |||
Whipple Induced
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: WWW
Posts: 4,338
|
I can see from this thread that I'm going to have to book myself for a drive of both!!
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
10-06-2006, 12:42 PM | #72 | ||
Great EF XR8
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 116
|
Good idea CDAA, book both in for a test drive. Thats the only way any of you who haven't driven both are going to be able to draw a conclusion.
SRT8 all the way! BTW, a typhoon with 22's would look stupid!
__________________
XR's are the only way to go, unless u can afford a typhoon! (In the ford stable anyway) |
||
10-06-2006, 12:45 PM | #73 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 88
|
Quote:
I love my Typhoon (as does anyone who's ever driven it), but it doesn't mean I automatically hate everything else. I'm sure the 300c SRT is a cracking car. It's just not for me.
__________________
Neo BFII Typhoon... auto, tints, mats, performance exhaust, very happy driver. :1syellow1 |
|||
10-06-2006, 12:57 PM | #74 | |||
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 375
|
Quote:
Having all that torque between 2000-4000 is bliss |
|||
10-06-2006, 08:07 PM | #75 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 462
|
I would take the 300C any day. I couldn't care less if it was 1 sec slower than a Ford. It's a great looking car.
|
||
10-06-2006, 08:24 PM | #76 | ||||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FoMoCo
Posts: 3,441
|
Quote:
__________________
FGX XR6 Lightning Strike Sedan BA XR6 Mk II Shockwave Sedan - Now Sold - gone but not forgotten mods: 20% under drive, Pacemaker Comps 4495' (ceramic coated) , 3' Metal Cat, XR6T exhaust - twin 3' tips, F6 CAI, K&N panel filter, PWR trans cooler, customed tuned by Heinrich Performance Tuning HPT 183.7rwkw. Quote:
|
||||
10-06-2006, 08:29 PM | #77 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,498
|
It just looks like a 15 year Bently that no one noticed 15 years ago.
|
||
10-06-2006, 08:31 PM | #78 | ||||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FoMoCo
Posts: 3,441
|
Quote:
__________________
FGX XR6 Lightning Strike Sedan BA XR6 Mk II Shockwave Sedan - Now Sold - gone but not forgotten mods: 20% under drive, Pacemaker Comps 4495' (ceramic coated) , 3' Metal Cat, XR6T exhaust - twin 3' tips, F6 CAI, K&N panel filter, PWR trans cooler, customed tuned by Heinrich Performance Tuning HPT 183.7rwkw. Quote:
|
||||
10-06-2006, 08:32 PM | #79 | |||
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 375
|
Quote:
|
|||
10-06-2006, 08:50 PM | #80 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In A House
Posts: 2,467
|
some ppl have far too much money : honestly both cars have taste but imho 300c has class and nothing beats the sound of a ford at full noise. bentley aint got nothing on the hemi ;) |
||
10-06-2006, 11:14 PM | #81 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,498
|
Looks like something designed by year 1 TAFE design students. Very boxing and not much style, other than radical grill and low roof which takes eyes away from lack of shape.
|
||
10-06-2006, 11:45 PM | #82 | |||
Solution Was Boost 4?, 6 & 8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 23,624
|
Quote:
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
AUTOTECH TUNED EDELEBROCK CHARGED 2017 GT Mustang Plenty of RWKW |
|||
10-06-2006, 11:50 PM | #83 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,498
|
The overall stock body shape.
Not that doesn't sort of work and look tough, but in a kindergaten kind of a way. If you draw a match box shape car you kind of get one of these. Reckon kindergarten kids now look like good drawers. lol :Reverend: |
||
10-06-2006, 11:56 PM | #84 | ||
Chairman & Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 1975
Posts: 107,527
|
What else needs to be said? Cheers Russ
__________________
Observatio Facta Rotae
|
||
10-06-2006, 11:57 PM | #85 | |||
Chairman & Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 1975
Posts: 107,527
|
Quote:
In the SRT8 we have a classic design that uses subtle wheel arch extensions; a change in the overall rake; a lower stance and a bigger wheel to body ratio to present a tougher stance than the 300C it is based on. The Typhoon presents another variation on the same old FPV body kit (that started life as T3) with an oversized wing tacked on the back; more plastic (and ill fitting) sill extensions; a slightly different front face and some wheels - all designed to shout boy racer from 50 yards away. The purpose of design is to make a statement and the 300C (in both forms) manages to do just that. It also achieves it from a purity in the original design which contains many subtle elements that together present an image that is generally deemed both muscular and aesthetic without the need for tack on pieces to provide additional street cred as the FPV products do. Choose not to like the car if you will but heed the saying (as far as design goes) that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Russ
__________________
Observatio Facta Rotae
|
|||
11-06-2006, 12:05 AM | #86 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,498
|
What someone has, as let's say there mode of transport, has nothing to do with their oppinions on style, shape, engineering or art. Glass houses does not come into it.
I believe they are radical head turning cars, that look boxy and not all that stylish. This is probably because I like cars with feminine shapes and curves, like Jags, aston martins, late 30's american cars, MGA etc. However, I don't need to explain this every time I express an opinion. My opinion holds even though my curent mode of transport is not an Aston Martin either. |
||
11-06-2006, 12:33 AM | #87 | ||
Solution Was Boost 4?, 6 & 8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 23,624
|
I think if anyone wants to compare a Chrysler to the Typhoon this is the car you should be putting up the ''Challenger'' it combines the old muscle car days with the benefits of the mod-cons of today and manged to keep the real tough looking car.
This car would seriously make me think about selling my BF F6.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
AUTOTECH TUNED EDELEBROCK CHARGED 2017 GT Mustang Plenty of RWKW |
||
11-06-2006, 09:24 AM | #88 | ||||
Cuban... nothing like it
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Watching in amusement
Posts: 11,643
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Laminge; 11-06-2006 at 09:38 AM. Reason: Not worth the effort |
||||
11-06-2006, 09:25 AM | #89 | ||||
Cuban... nothing like it
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Watching in amusement
Posts: 11,643
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||||
11-06-2006, 09:39 AM | #90 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,498
|
I love a debate/discussion about the issue or the topic, but not about the fact that I have an opinion.
|
||