Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-10-2008, 08:37 PM   #1
Sprint XR8
Regular Member
 
Sprint XR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 459
Default General Motors Considering Absorbing Chrysler, Eliminating Brands.

"GM is considering absorbing Chrysler under a take over deal, then phasing the automaker out of existence.
If such a scenario were to occur, GM would gain Chrysler's roughly $11 billion in cash and remove a competitor who now accounts for approximately 1.5 million units per year."http://jalopnik.com/5064441/report-g...inating-brands

Sprint XR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-10-2008, 09:33 PM   #2
Mark^^
Two-Spirits
 
Mark^^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,214
Default

Bugga that, I want a Jeep Wrangler, no way I would buy a Holden Wrangler!!!
Mark^^ is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-10-2008, 11:33 PM   #3
Buzz Box
Wheel Wally
 
Buzz Box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ballarat
Posts: 883
Default

Interesting concept.....

The thing is though at this point in time besides its cash what does Chrysler have to offer anyone??

Its engines aren't cutting edge, its interiors are , its dealership network is minimal and they only have a few models and if it wasn't for the 300C they'd proberly be out by now.
Buzz Box is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-10-2008, 12:46 AM   #4
Sprint XR8
Regular Member
 
Sprint XR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 459
Default

Chrysler have nothing to offer, all it's products overlap with GM.
GM would merge jeep with hummer, then kill off chrysler and dodge. The void left in the market would increase sales of GM product.
GM would also gain a larger slice of the $25 billion government bailout.
Sprint XR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-10-2008, 02:27 AM   #5
EgoFG
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,848
Default

Chrysler have an unequalled ability to go from concept to reality quickly, and keeping true to the concept.

This would be lost

Chrysler certainly surpass GM (and Ford) in some products. Judging by the 'absorb' and eliminate brand statements, this would also be lost.

I think it would be simply Cash, Firesale, government bailout.

An horrific shame if it goes ahead !
EgoFG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-10-2008, 02:56 AM   #6
BFZ Wagon
Formerly All Wheel Drive
 
BFZ Wagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gold Coast, QLD
Posts: 312
Default

I'm confused. If Chrysler is the one with the money and GM is the one that is bleeding money, how can GM takeover Chrysler? I would have thought it would be the more financial party that would be in a better position to absorb and shut down a brand?
I think it would be hilarious for GM to go byebyes..or at least have their oversized ego get trimmed down.
__________________
2015 MD Ford Mondeo Trend TDCi wagon in Ruby Red.
BFZ Wagon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-10-2008, 06:39 AM   #7
GS608
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ...in the shed
Posts: 3,386
Default

i hope Chrysler doesn't get absorbed by those pricks at GM, it would suck if Jeep, Dodge and Chrysler disappeared!
GS608 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-10-2008, 09:11 AM   #8
MethodX
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MethodX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,198
Default

Why such hate for GM?
They make the same dort of cars as Ford and Chrysler do.

Hate the japanese makers instead.
MethodX is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-10-2008, 09:17 AM   #9
GS608
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ...in the shed
Posts: 3,386
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MethodX
Why such hate for GM?
They make the same dort of cars as Ford and Chrysler do.

Hate the japanese makers instead.
but unlike GM, the jap makers actually make some decent cars!
GS608 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-10-2008, 09:28 AM   #10
MethodX
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MethodX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,198
Default

Corvette, Cadillac CTS-V and the Aussie and Euro GM cars are quite decent.
Plus GM has a history and classics. lol.
MethodX is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-10-2008, 09:35 PM   #11
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All Wheel Drive
I'm confused. If Chrysler is the one with the money and GM is the one that is bleeding money, how can GM takeover Chrysler? I would have thought it would be the more financial party that would be in a better position to absorb and shut down a brand?
I think it would be hilarious for GM to go byebyes..or at least have their oversized ego get trimmed down.
Chrysler has less money than any of them, they are currently owned by a private equity group after MB flogged them off for 2 fifths of feck all just to get rid of them.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-10-2008, 09:39 PM   #12
ebxr8240
Performance moderator
 
ebxr8240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St Clair..N.S.W
Posts: 14,875
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical advice. 
Default

Aha in todays climate.. Where's the money comeing from ???
Its the other side of the Pacific they should be worried about !!
__________________
Real cars are not driven by front wheels,real cars lift them!!...
BABYS ARE BOTTLE FED, REAL MEN GET BLOWN.
Don't be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark...Professionals built the Titanic!
Dart 330ci block turbo black pearl EBXR8 482 rwkw..
Daily driver GTE FG..
Projects http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=107711
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...8+turbo&page=4
ebxr8240 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-10-2008, 10:45 PM   #13
Sprint XR8
Regular Member
 
Sprint XR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 459
Default

Chrysler was purchased by private equity group Cerberus in aug 2007, Cerberus also currenty own 51% of GMAC GM's finance arm.
The deal is Cerberus would exchange Chrysler for GM's remaining 49% of GMAC.
Sprint XR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 12:35 AM   #14
Sprint XR8
Regular Member
 
Sprint XR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 459
Default

Article: GM aims to take Chrysler's cash, close its outdated plants.http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pb...810209993/1036
Sprint XR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 08:55 AM   #15
Cobra
Bear with a sore head
 
Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,703
Default

I would love if it backfired and it meant Ford got more sales. Maybe the Chrysler fan boys might boycott GM and buy Ford as a result, but over all it will come down to GM getting more sales, and that's all they want cash aside.
Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 09:27 AM   #16
whiskieboy
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 214
Default

Chrysler may be close to surmounting a stumbling block to a merger with General Motors or another automaker. Cerberus Capital Management, which owns a majority stake in Chrysler, is nearing a deal to buy out Daimler AG, which owns nearly one-fifth of the beleaguered American car company, Reuters has reported.
Just in from the States
whiskieboy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 09:29 AM   #17
whiskieboy
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 214
Default

The global financial crisis and speculation about a potential GM-Chrysler merger or other merger and acquisition activity is generating nearly around-the-clock auto industry coverage. Media are closely watching the liquidity situation at GM – and many have said a takeover of Chrysler would be signal of desperation. Ford continues to be included in “Detroit Three in crisis” stories, but key journalists and commentators have noted Ford is in the strongest relative position given its simplified brand portfolio, a bigger cash cushion and Ford Credit’s lending availability.
Also just in from the States,
whiskieboy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 09:49 AM   #18
Homer1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Homer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MethodX
Corvette, Cadillac CTS-V and the Aussie and Euro GM cars are quite decent.
Plus GM has a history and classics. lol.
So what???? History and classics counts for jack s*** now in the current climate. The ability to make good cars with maximum efficiency does and that's why the likes of GM and Fiat are in trouble.

GM I can live with as they still make some (but not much) decent products, but Fiat should just be put out of its misery along with the likes of Alitalia which like Fiat should have ceased to exist ages ago :evil_laug
__________________
"Italian cars were always a bit like Italian tempers. Easily broken."

Jeremy Clarkson, Mar 19th 2006 car review
Homer1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 09:53 AM   #19
MethodX
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MethodX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homer1
So what???? History and classics counts for jack s*** now in the current climate. The ability to make good cars with maximum efficiency does and that's why the likes of GM and Fiat are in trouble.

GM I can live with as they still make some (but not much) decent products, but Fiat should just be put out of its misery along with the likes of Alitalia which like Fiat should have ceased to exist ages ago :evil_laug
Ah riceboy right on cue.
FIAT isnt in trouble, its making money.
Whats your godforesaken country make again? remind us?
MethodX is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 09:56 AM   #20
gtxb67
moderator ford coupe club
 
gtxb67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MethodX
Why such hate for GM?
They make the same dort of cars as Ford and Chrysler do.

Hate the japanese makers instead.
the reason i hate gm is they do not have a passion for cars, only money. it is called "general" motors for a reason. they have (probably) not built a car in their life - they just own alot of companies that do. early in the last century ford was selling the most cars. general motors was formed because chevrolet, and all the others were not selling enough. the dodge brothers on the other hand, were investors in ford to begin with and while being involved with ford, then went off to build their own. at least they had a passion for cars and it would be sad to see chrysler fall off the face of the earth, especially if they were to get swallowed up by the "general" car makers

general motors appeal to the lowest common demoninator. at least with japanese cars, there may not be as much passion as with ford and chrysler, but they do make cars that although boring in many ways, will give a lot less trouble than the australian and american cars
gtxb67 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 10:02 AM   #21
MethodX
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MethodX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtxb67
the reason i hate gm is they do not have a passion for cars, only money. it is called "general" motors for a reason. they have (probably) not built a car in their life - they just own alot of companies that do. early in the last century ford was selling the most cars. general motors was formed because chevrolet, and all the others were not selling enough. the dodge brothers on the other hand, were investors in ford to begin with and while being involved with ford, then went off to build their own. at least they had a passion for cars and it would be sad to see chrysler fall off the face of the earth, especially if they were to get swallowed up by the "general" car makers

general motors appeal to the lowest common demoninator. at least with japanese cars, there may not be as much passion as with ford and chrysler, but they do make cars that although boring in many ways, will give a lot less trouble than the australian and american cars
i always remember the name coming from Durant when he added car companies to his empire.
not meaning to sound like it made appliance like cars.
MethodX is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 10:28 AM   #22
Walt Kowalski
I use brain. Not hip.
 
Walt Kowalski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Qld
Posts: 1,402
Default

I saw the thread and thought "what will they call themselves "Motors"?

Sorry. Couldn't help it.
Walt Kowalski is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 12:53 PM   #23
schnoods
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
schnoods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 1,234
Default

For a company that is doing hard financially, buying out a competitor for the sake of eliminating him is a bit strange.

I dont ever see GM going bust (due to government bailouts) but i do see having a minmal range of cars eventually.

Killing off the Dodge and Chrysler name would be a crime IMO, buy em out andsell under the badge but dont kill it, after all it could potentially be an asset if someone wanted to keep the badge alive.
__________________
A philosopher is a person who finds a problem for every solution . :Reverend:

95 EF XR8, Advance headers, Vortech V2 t trim blower, Ported Cobra Manifold, Capa Switch Chip Eliminator. 307 rwhp 395 ft/lb 13.2 @ 105mph

Now NA- AFR 165 heads, 1.6RR, Ported Cobra 269rwhp 14.2 ... needs stall and 4.11's

1977 CL Chrysler Panel Van, 360, 727 torqueflite auto soon to be restored.
schnoods is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 03:36 PM   #24
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

I think GM are going to kill off Pontiac, GMC and Saturn... I could see Buick and Chrysler merging brands (and being called Chrysler)
Chevrolet, Dodge, should stay
Cadillac would stay
I could see Holden, Vauxhall and Opel going under the Chevrolet brand, even if it did upset a few people at first.
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 05:04 PM   #25
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default

Hemi Powered corvette?
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 05:12 PM   #26
FPV8U
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
 
FPV8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
Hemi Powered corvette?
LS9 is fine thanks... :
FPV8U is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-10-2008, 05:54 PM   #27
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schnoods
For a company that is doing hard financially, buying out a competitor for the sake of eliminating him is a bit strange.

I dont ever see GM going bust (due to government bailouts) but i do see having a minmal range of cars eventually.

Killing off the Dodge and Chrysler name would be a crime IMO, buy em out andsell under the badge but dont kill it, after all it could potentially be an asset if someone wanted to keep the badge alive.
They can make money by selling off their assets, selling some of the brand names and by taking whatever cash reserves they have.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-10-2008, 12:12 AM   #28
Sprint XR8
Regular Member
 
Sprint XR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevypower
I think GM are going to kill off Pontiac, GMC and Saturn... I could see Buick and Chrysler merging brands (and being called Chrysler)
Chevrolet, Dodge, should stay
Cadillac would stay
I could see Holden, Vauxhall and Opel going under the Chevrolet brand, even if it did upset a few people at first.
When GM is eventualy restructured they will most likely make Chevrolet/Cadillac it's global brand.
Sprint XR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-10-2008, 01:32 AM   #29
IDT
Marko
 
IDT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perth W.A
Posts: 430
Default

I heard them say on SBS news two or three days ago day that there were merger talks occuring between Ford, Chrysler and GM as a result of the so called financial crisis.

Yes, I know its SBS the funny lookin grey haired lady. I even asked the missus if what I heard was correct. I'm not believing anything I see or hear about anything to do with the finacial crisis.
__________________
Mark
IDT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-10-2008, 10:02 AM   #30
Keepleft
Mot Adv-NSW
 
Keepleft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lake Macquarie, NSW
Posts: 2,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WAForce8
I'm not believing anything I see or hear about anything to do with the finacial crisis.
This is actually quite funny!~


Anyhow;-
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g...iahxQD93V4A3O0

Ford Share price:- as of 04:03 PM EDT on 10/22/2008 in USD (NYSE Delay: 20 mins.).
B]2.10 - [/B] 0.07 -3.23%
http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys
Notes 52 week low was 1.88, so its been lower...


Ford stands alone:-
While GM and Chrysler continue their flirtation - with Renault-Nissan watching from afar - the No. 2 automaker remains a wallflower.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/22/news...tune/index.htm
__________________
ORDER FORD AUSTRALIA PART NO: AM6U7J19G329AA. This is a European-UN/AS3790B Spec safety-warning triangle used to give advanced warning to approaching traffic of a vehicle breakdown, or crash scene (to prevent secondary). Stow in the boot area. See your Ford dealer for this $35.95 safety item & when you buy a new Ford, please insist on it! See Page 83, part 4.4.1 http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/media...eSafePart4.pdf

Last edited by Keepleft; 23-10-2008 at 10:10 AM.
Keepleft is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL