|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| OzECruisers General Discussions E/N/D vehicles General Discussion ONLY. NO TECH THREADS |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
29-03-2006, 07:09 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
stktlr
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Carrum Downs
Posts: 359
|
what is the power dif between the two? is it that noticeable, im about to run a ed motor with new head that is setup for cfi like mine and was curious between the two about power. i will eventually go mpfi but just curious
|
||
|
|
|
29-03-2006, 07:12 PM
|
#2 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,419
|
120kw compared to 139 for 3.9 litre
148kw for eb2 -ed 157kw for ef - el
__________________
405rwhp LS1, FG XR6T Ute manual, VE series 2 Omega LPG. |
||
|
|
|
|
29-03-2006, 07:13 PM
|
#3 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oakleigh
Posts: 3,844
|
from http://www.deleted link/portal/kb.php?mode=cat&cat=1
EA Power 90 kW @ 4,000 rpm (3.2 CFI) 120 kW @ 4,250 rpm (3.9 CFI) 139 kW @ 4,250 rpm (3.9 MPI) Torque 235 Nm @ 3,250 rpm (3.2 CFI) 311 Nm @ 3,250 rpm (3.9 CFI) 338 Nm @ 3,500 rpm (3.9 MPI) EB-ED Power 120 kW @ 4,250 rpm (3.9 CFI) 139 kW @ 4,250 rpm (3.9 MPI) 148 kW @ 4,500 rpm (4.0 MPI) Torque 311 Nm @ 3,250 rpm (3.9 CFI) 338 Nm @ 3,500 rpm (3.9 MPI) 348 Nm @ 3,750 rpm (4.0 MPI) there is a noticable different EDIT: beaten |
||
|
|
|
|
29-03-2006, 07:34 PM
|
#4 | ||
|
Boooostn'
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide Northside
Posts: 905
|
You'd probably notice next to no difference since you are still running CFI...
__________________
2012 FPV GS Ute - Kinetic, Supercharged 5.0L, 6spd ZF auto, leather interior - The Boosted Daily! 1979 XD Fairmont Ghia - Silver, 302C V8, Full velour interior, slowly building her up to be a tough cruiser! 2002 Nissan Patrol ST - Desert Gold, 4.8L DOHC 6cyl petrol (Soon to be reequipped with a 5.7L LS1 V8), 5speed auto, lifted, locked, 33's, nature destruction vehicle! |
||
|
|
|
|
29-03-2006, 10:38 PM
|
#5 | ||
|
Low and Loud
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,273
|
Why would you still want to use CFI :S
__________________
1993 Ford Fairlane NC3 Silver - LTD mockup, Worked V8 & Auto, Fully Optioned, Half of my Audio department at work installed in the car 1993 Ford Falcon XR6 Poly Green Stationwagon - 4.0 I6, Auto, 3:45LSD, All the usual XR6 Stuff but in a wagon  :
|
||
|
|
|
|
29-03-2006, 10:41 PM
|
#6 | ||
|
likes falcon's
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,091
|
multipoint is smoother aswell.
__________________
www.carhubsales.com.au |
||
|
|
|
|
31-03-2006, 02:03 AM
|
#7 | ||
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 185
|
I reckon CFI runs and idles smoother coz of equal mixture thru all cylinders but MPI is def more responsive and powerfull
 Brent
__________________
EB1 Falcon Wagon 3.9L Multipoint with 5 speed manual Pacemaker extractors & 2.5" Redback exhaust Tickford Head and Wade 1004 cam HP4 Chiptorque chip and XH intake 1992 DC LTD
5LTR DUEL FUEL |
||
|
|
|
cpi to mpfi kw diff
Linear Mode
