|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
17-11-2015, 08:22 PM | #1 | ||
BUILT FORD TUFF
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Mackay QLD
Posts: 1,919
|
It seams that the new Everest is holding its own against the Prado and Fortuner. It has beaten both of them in the last two reviews I have read even with the Prados new 2.8L engine and 6 speed auto. They noted that the Everest was better on the road than the Prado while the Prado was better off road. The Everest won the towing segment with its 3T tow rating and also had a higher water wading depth. The Everest beat the Fortuner in all areas while it was also noted that The Everest engine was better than the toyotas 2.8L. Not a bad showing from the Ford considering the Toyota has been practicing in this segment for years.
__________________
2015 FGX XR6 Turbo |
||
6 users like this post: |
17-11-2015, 08:27 PM | #2 | |||
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 418
|
Quote:
I read the same reviews and the off-road coverage seemed to be the result of comparing wheel articulation specs rather than actual test driving??? |
|||
17-11-2015, 08:41 PM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,308
|
Prado Fortuner are cheaper, except the Prado Kakadu ,would be in Toyotas favour??
__________________
CSGhia |
||
17-11-2015, 08:54 PM | #4 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,335
|
Quote:
I'm even starting to like the back end of the Everest. It looks good filthy. If this one wasn't Orangey red it would probably look pretty good. |
|||
18-11-2015, 06:09 PM | #5 | |||
Same ****-Different Day
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern Vic
Posts: 1,287
|
Quote:
Crusader is a closer comparison to the Trend, albeit with leather.
__________________
Bax. Current Vehicles RA Wildtrak V6, UA2 Everest Trend 2.0lt |
|||
18-11-2015, 11:43 PM | #6 | ||
Wirlankarra yanama
Join Date: May 2006
Location: God's Country
Posts: 2,103
|
So that's what they look like, I can't actually recall ever seeing one on the road.
BTW, good luck to anyone who buys an Everest, hopefully you bought it for a really great price because I have feeling its depreciation is going to hurt big time. |
||
19-11-2015, 09:22 AM | #7 | ||
Render unto Caesar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ::1
Posts: 4,228
|
I have seen a couple on the road and i thought they looked pretty good. My initial reaction is well documented and I didn't like it. I am happy to retract that statement.
I hope Ford sell well and it proves to be a good product.
__________________
"Aliens might be surprised to learn that in a cosmos with limitless starlight, humans kill for energy sources buried in sand." - Neil deGrasse Tyson |
||
12-01-2016, 12:37 PM | #8 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven
Posts: 3,161
|
Everest has come out well in a comparison with Prado today:
http://www.caradvice.com.au/406863/f...arison-review/ It's only a pity Ford couldn't get a bit more interior space lengthwise out of the Everest.
__________________
Officially Fordless |
||
12-01-2016, 04:06 PM | #9 | |||
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
Posts: 1,991
|
Quote:
Ford's also not new to 4WD vehicles given the F-trucks, Maverick, Ranger, Territory etc.
__________________
Current vehicles: MY12 Land Rover Discovery 4 TDV6, MY03 Land Rover Discovery 2 HSE Td5 off road modified and 1989 Mazda NA MX-5 toy car. Previously: 1992 Ford EBII Fairmont, 1994 Ford EF Falcon XR6 supercharged, 2003 Ford BA Falcon XR6 Turbo 325rwkw, and 2002 Ford AU3 Falcon XR8 Pursuit 250 270rwkw. |
|||
12-01-2016, 04:10 PM | #10 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,874
|
This Everest most certainly is a new model. Just as the PX Ranger is a new model. Old model Everest is based on the Mazda J97 Ranger which had zero Ford design input. There is nothing common between the two.
|
||
This user likes this post: |
12-01-2016, 04:32 PM | #11 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,586
|
A wins a win but caradvice is generally pretty nice to Ford.
Everests interior is pretty dull though, plastics atleast look hard and not quite what I would want from a 70k+ car at that level. On the base model maybe, Prados is not better but its a very old model.
__________________
|
||
This user likes this post: |
12-01-2016, 07:13 PM | #12 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
|
Quote:
|
|||
This user likes this post: |
12-01-2016, 07:19 PM | #13 | |||
Donating Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,828
|
Quote:
The nameplate has been used before, that's all.... |
|||
13-01-2016, 08:08 AM | #14 | |||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
|
BTW:
http://www.caradvice.com.au/408536/t...79mm-to-225mm/ Quote:
__________________
Daniel |
|||
13-01-2016, 03:46 PM | #15 | ||
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
That's not much at all.
|
||
13-01-2016, 03:54 PM | #16 | ||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
|
__________________
Daniel |
||
13-01-2016, 05:12 PM | #17 | ||
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 418
|
Difficult to have a different outcome with similar wheel/tyre sizes unless Toyota is redefining Pi as something other than 3.142 approx???? And micro diff housing size? 😀
|
||