|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
15-10-2010, 12:05 AM | #1 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
|
|
||
15-10-2010, 12:14 AM | #2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hazelbrook, NSW
Posts: 915
|
still better looking than a hilux but I agree with you JPFS1 the ranger is the best looking one, just looks so tuff. The T6 ranger was the first light truck (bar the raptor) to make me think i wouldn't mind owning one.
__________________
2014 Ford FG MKII G6E Turbo 1999 Ford AU Falcon Forte Past Vehicles: 2015 Ford Territory TS MKII - diesel burner 2016 Ford FM Mustang GT - The Dream Car 2007 FPV BF MKII GT - popping the V8 cherry 1997 Ford EL Falcon Futura - 6 cylinders of fury |
||
15-10-2010, 12:16 AM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
|
|
||
15-10-2010, 12:28 AM | #4 | ||
.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 6,197
|
Thanks for posting.
Looks a bit limp to me, a very big improvement but IMO the Hilux looks better. The interior kills the Hilux easily. I haven't seen the new Ranger yet - are pics released? edit - just checked the other thread. Ranger looks brilliant. Will look very tough with a lift-kit and wheels. |
||
15-10-2010, 07:50 AM | #5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Victoria
Posts: 836
|
To me, following Mazda's "smiley face" design language has not worked very well on this. It's a shame because it usually looks fairly good.
|
||
15-10-2010, 08:19 AM | #6 | ||
Broken eBay Starter Motor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 546
|
I don't like the front end the back end or the sides.
|
||
15-10-2010, 08:23 AM | #7 | ||
PURSUIT 250
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sydney
Posts: 5,829
|
give me the ranger. this thing hurts my eyes
|
||
15-10-2010, 08:25 AM | #8 | ||
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,938
|
Outside isn't a winner for me but i like the interior.
|
||
15-10-2010, 08:32 AM | #9 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,585
|
Yeah I don't know if mazdas language really works with a pickup, can't see many typical blokes going for that over a ranger....unless....swmbo is driving it a bit with the kids.
None of these seem to be as good on the outside as the f trucks.
__________________
|
||
15-10-2010, 09:10 AM | #10 | ||
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,736
|
Hmm, being a current model Mazda 6 owner, I had high hopes for the BT50 as it looks like I will be forced into a dual cab for my next vehicle, but (you could feel the but coming couldn't you?) I am sorry, the current Mazda styling doesn't translate well onto the BT50. The interior looks great in my opinion - better than the Ranger, but the exterior is just wrong.
When Mazda said it would stand out, they weren't wrong, but that is not necessarily a good thing. |
||
15-10-2010, 11:30 AM | #11 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 838
|
That thing is Fugly!
|
||
15-10-2010, 11:35 AM | #12 | ||
Render unto Caesar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ::1
Posts: 4,228
|
Fugly but I do like the interior...
__________________
"Aliens might be surprised to learn that in a cosmos with limitless starlight, humans kill for energy sources buried in sand." - Neil deGrasse Tyson |
||
15-10-2010, 11:46 AM | #13 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 11
|
isnt that just a triton rebadged ;)
|
||
15-10-2010, 11:54 AM | #14 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,585
|
What I will give them props for is the different tail lights, I know there is only so much you can do with that space but atleast its different. But WTF is with the little reflectors below the lights, is that because there are none in the actual light itself?
This would have to be the first not so good Mazda in a while!
__________________
|
||
15-10-2010, 01:44 PM | #15 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
|
|
||
15-10-2010, 03:03 PM | #16 | ||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,523
|
Phwoar!
Susan Boyle looks like Beyonce compared to that. |
||
15-10-2010, 06:46 PM | #17 | ||
XY,XC,XEx2,XA,EF,AU,BA,XY
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ballarat, Victoria.
Posts: 444
|
ARB would be looking at this thing right now thinking "What The!...we're going to have to make a bullbar for this??!"
Way too much "Mazda Smiley Face" front on this thing. Doesn't suit a "truck" Rear lights look ordinary also IMO. As said... Fugly, but nice interior.
__________________
A sad day when there's no Falcon variant in the garage! |
||
15-10-2010, 07:24 PM | #18 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 287
|
Gee hope the lights on the tray door are just for looks?? as they will be useless when you drive around with the door folded down if you have a longer load in there
|
||
15-10-2010, 07:36 PM | #19 | ||
Former BTIKD
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sunny Downtown Wagga Wagga. NSW.
Posts: 53,197
|
Yup, that's what a Ford forum really needs. Lots of big pictures of a Mazda.
__________________
Dying at your job is natures way of saying that you're in the wrong line of work.
|
||
15-10-2010, 07:46 PM | #20 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ...in the shed
Posts: 3,386
|
Is that an FG auto gear stick? and can anyone else see FG G6 in those fog lights too?
only positives i can see in those pictures..lol at the bloke who designed it saying it's suppose to draw influence from a lion |
||
15-10-2010, 07:54 PM | #21 | |||
Donating Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,627
|
Quote:
I think the the problem overall is that it has been very over designed. I much prefer the Ranger |
|||
15-10-2010, 07:54 PM | #22 | |||
Broken eBay Starter Motor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 546
|
Quote:
|
|||
15-10-2010, 08:02 PM | #23 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ...in the shed
Posts: 3,386
|
Quote:
|
|||
15-10-2010, 08:31 PM | #24 | ||
Donating Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,627
|
The Ranger is a no nonsense design. The Mazda is just too fussy for a workhorse/truck. I think it will sell well though, you only need to look at Triton sales once it had a styling overhall
|
||
15-10-2010, 08:49 PM | #25 | |||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,523
|
Quote:
|
|||
15-10-2010, 11:04 PM | #26 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,334
|
Looks like a "Great" Wall.
Kill it with FIRE!! |
||
15-10-2010, 11:05 PM | #27 | ||
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,736
|
I think the Triton looks great, well before they facelifted it and stretched the tub. To me the Mazda just looks wrong in those pics. Hopefully in the flesh it will look better.
|
||
16-10-2010, 12:01 AM | #28 | ||
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,736
|
I think the back view would look better without the lights on the tailgate.
|
||
16-10-2010, 11:56 AM | #29 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,653
|
Where was this one designed?? We know the Ranger was done here, but who does the BT??
|
||
16-10-2010, 12:21 PM | #30 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
|
Quote:
Thread title is clear, if you didn't want to see it, you didn't need to open the thread, how's that for an |
|||