Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-05-2006, 01:35 PM   #1
act2617
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 185
Angry The real mpg. From the USA

The government has been keeping a secret about automobiles under wraps for the past 30 years. What's the secret? Your car is not getting the gas mileage promised on the showroom sticker. The actual mpg could be as much as 50% lower. Say what?

Consumer Reports' David Champion reported, "People are going into showrooms, they're looking at that sticker that says miles per gallon and they're saying, 'Oh it get goods miles per gallon, but in reality, they're being cheated."

Automotive manufacturers put cars through a simulated city course. Next the highway -- a real highway. For the third test, they take the car out on a 150-mile day trip throughout Connecticut. All the while, a special miles per gallon meter is ticking away. Their results? Many numbers you see on those stickers are off way off -- one as much as 50 percent.

Consumer Reports did their own real-life tests and came up with very different mpg results. For example: Honda claims its hybrid Civic sedan gets 48 mpg in the city. Consumer Reports found it only gets 26 mpg -- a 46 percent difference. Read the news report for test results on other cars.

The EPA has said a change is coming in time for the 2008 models, but admits there is no perfect test.





http://www.wesh.com/news/9141621/det...subid=10100244

act2617 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 01:39 PM   #2
charles_wif_xf
Purveyor of filth
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,958
Default

Those "official" fuel consumption figures I tend to take with a grain of salt. There are prime examples of stock BA's for one, where one will exhibit figures of 14L/100km in combo driving and some can pull 10L/100km.
charles_wif_xf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 01:49 PM   #3
brenx
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
brenx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pakenham, Victoria
Posts: 6,983
Default

Thing is it'll very for every driver.

BA I6's are odd. My dads gets 14/15L/100km yet his boss used one temporarily that saw 11L/100km. Now my dad would almost kill to get that type of milage.

I'm not doing to bad in my Astina 1.8l. I put a sports exhaust on and dropped it from 9.9L/100km ->8.9L/100km.

My EL's getting 15L/100km which isn't too bad really considering it's engine is 2.2lt larger than the Astina. Lowest I've every got from the EL is 13.5L/100km

If anyone's interested in working theirs out? Click below

http://www.accommodationz.co.nz/economycalculator.html
__________________
74 XB Fairmont (street car) 11.07@123.02mph. 08 LV Ford Focus XR5 (daily).

Tuned by Hallam Performance
brenx is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 02:00 PM   #4
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Have you seen the outrageous figures the US EPA posts? I don't know how they test their cars, but according to them, a 7-litre V8 Corvette Z06 is more economical then some small, 2.5 V6 engined cars... until you test them in the real world and, well, yeah.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 02:01 PM   #5
seano14
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brenx
My EL's getting 15L/100km which isn't too bad really considering it's engine is 2.2lt larger than the Astina. Lowest I've every got from the EL is 13.5L/100km

If anyone's interested in working theirs out? Click below

http://www.accommodationz.co.nz/economycalculator.html
useful link that one, i would have thought your EL would be alot better than 15L/100km.

my old LTD gets around 13L/100 and its one of the old leaded 4.1L crossflows! sure enough that site calculated 13.07L/100, 21MPG
seano14 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 04:27 PM   #6
Bermo
Was BRT-351 now BRT-393
 
Bermo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Blue Mts NSW
Posts: 197
Default

I find it varies alot on your driving style.
I usually average 10.3L/100Km in my BA, but I leant my car to a friend and it went up to 11.2L/100Km.
He wasn't hammering it though, he just takes off quicker from lights and puts the foot down to go up hills.

All comes down to driving style.
Bermo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 04:33 PM   #7
turboute
turboute
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 502
Default

One of my bosses gets about 10L per 100 in his Slightly Modified CV8 Monaro...
So one of the other workmates bought himeself a SSZ Ute - the way he drives though he wont get anywhere near 10L/100
turboute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 04:50 PM   #8
EACRUISER
EA V8 & AU II 4.0 Forte
 
EACRUISER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 163
Default

Links very good.

Answer for my car is not so good.
Then again i didn't build it for fuel economy, i built it for fun :baby bott :baby bott

18L/per 100kms when cruising,
26.42L/per 100kms when driving a little bit more enthusiastic.
31.65L/per 100 when driving like a noob. :baby bott

She's a drinker, i can tell you that.

Then again what do i expect my Factory TripMeter is always saying 20-30 on the instantanious consumption meter cruising and goes close to 99 when i take off from the lights.
EACRUISER is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 04:54 PM   #9
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

i find the stickers good as far as comparing each vehicle to each other - real world economy might be different, but to be totally accurate, i could not compare another vehicle to mine in exactly the same way without owning it - so if they all use the same testing process, and we just use the figures for comparitive purposes only (which is what is usually indicated) - then they can be useful
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 05:36 PM   #10
Smoked
Burnin Rubber
 
Smoked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,824
Default

A car manufacturer lying to us to make a sale is not a new concept, its just getting more difficult for them to hide things.
__________________
2001 AUII Forte (LPG)
K&N Air Filter
Tickford Air Intake
***Coming Soon: Clear Side Repeaters***
Quote:
Originally Posted by The-ShowStoPPa
...dont get me wrong this 3.8v6 is pretty special, it does come with the popular shake rattle and roll option and the auto compliments this with the ever popular snap crackle and pop feature
Smoked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 06:26 PM   #11
Deanodriver
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 138
Default

I reckon, as a general rule of thumb, the quoted city economy is close to what you'll get in day-to-day driving.

I know with my old Pintara, the economy was 8hwy/10.5city, and I used to get around 10.5 often. I'm getting 12ishL/100km from the Falcon as well.
__________________
My first E-series: (*gone* :() 1994 EF Futura
Current Ride: 1993 Ford Telstar GLX, maroon manual sedan, Alpine CD player
Deanodriver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 06:33 PM   #12
hoppo366
Regular Member
 
hoppo366's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisbane, St Lucia
Posts: 153
Default

I managed 220km on 22L 10L/100km average in my XF Stage 2 4.1 with EFI on the weekend. Freak occurance usually about 14L/100 highway and 20L/100 in the city. Hope it stays that way. 150k's of that was on the highway doing 110 with T5 and 2.92 gears
hoppo366 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 06:36 PM   #13
vegabass
BASS ON BOARD!
 
vegabass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tweed Heads NSW
Posts: 2,194
Default

Hmm I get awesome economy!

600 kms to a tank (best has been 682)
68L tank?
11.3 per 100 that’s will WOT and fun. Can inc a trip to willowbank!

The worse economy I ever get is
500km to a tank
13.6 per 100kms
__________________
Nothing interesting to put here.
vegabass is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 09:38 PM   #14
outback_ute
Ute Forum Moderator
Contributing Member
 
outback_ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 7,227
Default

Is anyone surprised road testers don't get the official economy figures, they are normally pushing the cars hard at least some of the time (if not most). Most people would not drive to maximise economy as evidenced by the figures above. Of course the manufacturers are going to give the best figures possible!

Quote:
Originally Posted by act2617
The government has been keeping a secret about automobiles under wraps for the past 30 years. What's the secret? Your car is not getting the gas mileage promised on the showroom sticker. The actual mpg could be as much as 50% lower. Say what?
I suppose that might be a secret from some... How dare the government lie to us :
outback_ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-05-2006, 10:20 PM   #15
LethalLeigh
Get in the van!
 
LethalLeigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 1,110
Default

To get the figure listed on the sticker you might want to use the highest gear possible and turn those pesky things like the stereo and aircon off! Driving style is the biggest variable which is why I'm getting 450km out of a 35L fill in my Fiesta and some other drivers on the forum are getting 650km. Still, it's a damn sight cheaper to run than my Falcon and I enjoy it just as much.
__________________
The Dad Bus (TM): 2004 BA XT Wagon, soon to be set up as a camper and tourer.
LethalLeigh is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2006, 05:06 AM   #16
qwigybo
hunting 300kw's
 
qwigybo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bendigo
Posts: 1,371
Default

my ef gets 11.7L/100km and i'm always giving it some poop
according to that calculator my ba xr6 ute used to get 15.2/100
which wouldn't suprise me it almost always displayed 99/100 whenever i would take off
__________________
current ride: '04 XR6 Turbo, Phantom, Premium sound.BluePower Enhanced
236.9rwkw 8psi DAMN VALVE SPRINGS (stock 13.82 @ 106.08 HPR)(8psi 13.29 @ 103.93)
'99 r8 clubsport, leather, sunroof, 6speed, yeah the turbo is faster.....
qwigybo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2006, 07:27 AM   #17
Mike Gayner
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Mike Gayner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 1,488
Default

So, what does this have to do with the government?

On a side note, when the hell is the USA going to get out of the stone age and go metric?
Mike Gayner is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-05-2006, 06:05 PM   #18
[Tonko]
What's green is gold
 
[Tonko]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Shepparton
Posts: 3,079
Default

im lucky to get 400km out of the EA... as for the XD....i dont want to know....
__________________

EF XR8 - Koni's - Cam and Headwork -3.9s - Ex VIC TMU -


1982 Nissan Patrol - 460 ci Big Block soon - Semi Gloss Black - Dark Tint - 4x 6" Infinity Kappa Perfect Splits - 5" Kappa 2 ways - Kappa 6x9's - 2x12" Kappa perfect subs - 2x4 Channel and 2x Mono Kappa amps-


[Tonko] is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 08:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL