Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-05-2013, 01:39 PM   #1
DeepBlueOval
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11
Default Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

I've been deciding between these two V8's and a key factor is low RPM torque.

The consensus on the forums seems to be that the stroked 5.6 Windsor has the edge but the only figures I've been able to find for the Boss indicate it has 400nm at 1000rpm!

Can anyone provide some torque specs at low rpm (1000/2000/3000 etc) for these engines?

220kw tickford
5.6 stroker
boss 260
boss 290
barra 240t

Thanks

DeepBlueOval is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 01:54 PM   #2
Whitey-AMG
AWD Assassin
 
Whitey-AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,170
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Which cars in particular are you seriously thinking of buying ?
What trans ?
Are you planning any mods - or leaving car completely stock.
Whitey-AMG is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 02:01 PM   #3
Cheese3
The BEST Falcon is the AU
 
Cheese3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: VIC
Posts: 2,096
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Bahahahaha Boss engine and low rpm torque mentioned in the same sentance
Cheese3 is offline  
2 users like this post:
Old 13-05-2013, 02:03 PM   #4
Whitey-AMG
AWD Assassin
 
Whitey-AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,170
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese3 View Post
Bahahahaha Boss engine and low rpm torque mentioned in the same sentance
Didnt take long for the TROLLS to enter.......

Runs and grabs the pop corn....
Whitey-AMG is offline  
This user likes this post:
Old 13-05-2013, 02:05 PM   #5
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Gearing and weight are a factor too.
mik is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 02:16 PM   #6
FTE217
T3/Sprint8
Donating Member2
 
FTE217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 16,652
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Quote:
Originally Posted by ESP View Post
Didnt take long for the TROLLS to enter.......

Runs and grabs the pop corn....
Awww come on your usually not the couch potato, looking forward to your real life experience driving stock for stock low down torque experince comparo of the 5.6 wheezer v's your 290, hey auto or manual which ever you prefer.
Thats the factors here stock as a rock ex showroom.
Come on help out the OP instead of jumping in calling people trolls go figure
__________________
Tickfords T3/TS50 '02
Sprint8 manual Sept 24 '16
Daily Macan GTS
"Don't believe everything you read on the internet. Abraham Lincoln"
FTE217 is offline  
2 users like this post:
Old 13-05-2013, 02:19 PM   #7
DeepBlueOval
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

So the cars (all manual) I'm considering are as follows in order of my current preferences

T3 TE50
T2 TE50/AUIII XR8
BA GT-P
BA XR6T

I can spend 3-5k on mods over time if necessary
DeepBlueOval is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 02:21 PM   #8
T3rminator
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
T3rminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,940
Default

You'll find it hard to get stats throughout the rev ranges, as most will just give peak torque. The turbo will give you a range, and I know 80% of the 500Nm on the 5.6 is from 2000RPM.

If low down torque is what you are after, go the 5.6 or turbo......or a barra 220. ))))



Sent from my HTC Desire HD A9191 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Rides (past and present)
Current: 2004 Ford Falcon 5.4L 3v Barra 220, Manual
Past: Mitsubishi Sigma (m), Toyota Seca (m), Toyota Seca SX (m), Toyota Vienta V6 (m), Toyota Soarer 4L v8 (a), BA XR8 ute (m), T3 TE50 (m), BMW Z4 (m)

AFF motto - If contrary views trigger, please use ignore button.
T3rminator is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 02:25 PM   #9
Whitey-AMG
AWD Assassin
 
Whitey-AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,170
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Ive got a much better idea.....why doesnt the OP go and take the cars he is interested in for a drive and make up his own mind.
These threads go nowhere and have been done to death.....
Whitey-AMG is offline  
This user likes this post:
Old 13-05-2013, 02:34 PM   #10
DeepBlueOval
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

ESP I've driven all of these except the t-series stroker, but not in manual. While from reading other threads I can see why you would say these go nowhere, I'm actually after specific information.

T3rminator, how different would you say the 5.6 is from the 5.0 in the T2 at 1000-2000 rpm?

Also how much would it cost to stroke the 5.0?
DeepBlueOval is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 02:35 PM   #11
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

I think its only the 290 that was quoted as having 400nm at 1000rpm.
FPV GTHO is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 02:39 PM   #12
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese3 View Post
Bahahahaha Boss engine and low rpm torque mentioned in the same sentance
Going from memory my factory standard BA 5.4 Boss demonstrated:

1500 RPM at about 460 Nm
2000 RPM at just over 510 Nm

From there it was reasonably flattish climbing to a peak of about 540-550Nm until it started to drop after it passed 5500.

I remember these numbers as this particular point tended to be brought up reasonably often on the old Forum back in 2003.

Now remind me again what the MAXIMUM torque demonstrated at any RPM by the hand built "super engine" about which you constantly dribble on......

Of course if you are only interested in torque below 1500 RPM there are a lot of front wheel drive 4 cylinder diesel hatches for you to choose.
flappist is offline  
This user likes this post:
Old 13-05-2013, 02:44 PM   #13
Alan D Segal
Call me 'Al'
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: On a flattened-out cardboard box out the back behind the wheelie bins.
Posts: 940
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Good contributor. 
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist View Post
Going from memory from my factory standard BA 5.4 Boss demonstrated:

1500 RPM at about 460 Nm
2000 RPM at just over 510 Nm
I'd believe it. In my BA XR8 auto I can drive all around Brisbane on 60-70km/h roads without going over 2000rpm and still keep up with traffic easily. It has 4.1s so it isn't directly relevant. I think people under-rate how much torque they really have though.
Alan D Segal is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 03:09 PM   #14
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist View Post
Going from memory my factory standard BA 5.4 Boss demonstrated:

1500 RPM at about 460 Nm
2000 RPM at just over 510 Nm

From there it was reasonably flattish climbing to a peak of about 540-550Nm until it started to drop after it passed 5500.

I remember these numbers as this particular point tended to be brought up reasonably often on the old Forum back in 2003.

Now remind me again what the MAXIMUM torque demonstrated at any RPM by the hand built "super engine" about which you constantly dribble on......

Of course if you are only interested in torque below 1500 RPM there are a lot of front wheel drive 4 cylinder diesel hatches for you to choose.
What sort of dyno were those figures taken from?
FPV GTHO is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 03:14 PM   #15
b2tf
not here much anymore
 
b2tf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Cant quote numbers only 'real world' experience and the Windsor has it all over the BOSS down low.
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
b2tf is offline  
2 users like this post:
Old 13-05-2013, 03:21 PM   #16
Cheese3
The BEST Falcon is the AU
 
Cheese3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: VIC
Posts: 2,096
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Comon guys , don't shoot the messenger I'm just saying what people are thinking . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeepBlueOval View Post
I've been deciding between these two V8's and a key factor is low RPM torque.

The consensus on the forums seems to be that the stroked 5.6 Windsor has the edge but the only figures I've been able to find for the Boss indicate it has 400nm at 1000rpm!

Can anyone provide some torque specs at low rpm (1000/2000/3000 etc) for these engines?

220kw tickford
5.6 stroker
boss 260
boss 290
barra 240t

Thanks
Why is low rpm torque the key factor , towing ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist View Post
Going from memory my factory standard BA 5.4 Boss demonstrated:

1500 RPM at about 460 Nm
2000 RPM at just over 510 Nm

From there it was reasonably flattish climbing to a peak of about 540-550Nm until it started to drop after it passed 5500.

I remember these numbers as this particular point tended to be brought up reasonably often on the old Forum back in 2003.

Now remind me again what the MAXIMUM torque demonstrated at any RPM by the hand built "super engine" about which you constantly dribble on......

Of course if you are only interested in torque below 1500 RPM there are a lot of front wheel drive 4 cylinder diesel hatches for you to choose.
You Sir are correct !
Cheese3 is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 03:49 PM   #17
FGII-XR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FGII-XR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salamander Bay
Posts: 5,427
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

the BA turbo will give you what you want and be cheaper to run unless you flog it
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Everyone starts off with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the experience bag before the luck bag is empty.

"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt."

Start a new career as a bus driver

Rides:
FG2 XR6 stock at this stage but a very nice ride

xc 4 DOOR X CHASER 5.8 UNDER RESTO
FGII-XR6 is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 04:02 PM   #18
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Quote:
Originally Posted by FPV GTHO View Post
What sort of dyno were those figures taken from?
One of the engine dynos at FPV. It was on display at one of the open days.
flappist is offline  
This user likes this post:
Old 13-05-2013, 04:13 PM   #19
EASYBOSS
Matakana NZ
Donating Member3
 
EASYBOSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Matakana NZ
Posts: 3,685
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeepBlueOval View Post
So the cars (all manual) I'm considering are as follows in order of my current preferences

T3 TE50
T2 TE50/AUIII XR8
BA GT-P
BA XR6T

I can spend 3-5k on mods over time if necessary
Get the BA GT/GTP and put 4.1 diff gears in, problem solved hands down
__________________
SOLD : BA XR8 4 Speed Auto in Mercury Silver, Bluepower CIA, Full Diffilipo Big Boy Quad System, Tune, 4.11 Diff Gears, FPV Starter Button, FPV GT Rear Spoiler, Tripod Gauges, PWR Trans Cooler. 230 RWKW's. Many thanks to Chris at Bluepower Racing Developments

Hers : F6X build #150 in Ego, Stock as a Rock, untill the warranty runs out, including the extended one.

My Work Wagon AU Futura Wagon in Gold.

On the Farm : Ford 6600 Tractor
EASYBOSS is offline  
Old 13-05-2013, 04:16 PM   #20
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default Re: Boss Vs Windsor low RPM torque

Hmm, member for 5 years with 11 posts.

Suddenly I had a feeling of deja vu.

http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11226669

You have your answers. This thread is done.

closed.
flappist is offline  
2 users like this post:
Closed Thread


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL